Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of autonomy gap in personnel policy, principal leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy on their organizational commitment

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

School autonomy in personnel policy is important to effective personnel management. With increased autonomy in personnel policy, principals could wield their leadership to improve teachers’ organizational commitment. However, little is known about whether the given autonomy in personnel policy meets principals’ expectation and whether and how the gap in between has an effect on teachers’ organizational commitment. This research explores the effects of autonomy gap in personnel policy, principal leadership, teachers’ self-efficacy and school contextual factors on teachers’ organizational commitment. Multilevel analysis was used. The results show the effects of autonomy gap in personnel policy differ among areas. In particular, the autonomy gap in salary was found to be a significant antecedent of teachers’ organizational commitment. The results also highlight the importance of principal leadership in this process. Principals with a stronger leadership tend to perceive generally a larger autonomy gap in personnel policy. In addition, when transformational leadership increased, its positive influence on teachers’ organizational commitment became even stronger. Implications for developing efficacious leadership and autonomy policy in personnel management were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamowski, S., Therriault, S., & Cavanna, A. (2007). The autonomy gap: Barriers to effective school leadership. New York, NY: Fordham Foundation. http://mikemcmahon.info/AutonomyGap.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2014.

  • Adamson, L. (2012). Exploring principal autonomy in charter, private, and public schools. California State University.

  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L. G., & Murphy, J. (1998). Site-based management and school success: Untangling the variables. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(4), 358–385. doi:10.1080/0924345980090402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 349–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662–683. doi:10.1177/00131610121969460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogler, R., & Nir, A. E. (2014). The contribution of perceived fit between job demands and abilities to teachers’ commitment and job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership,. doi:10.1177/1741143214535736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–289. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, N. A., & Bastedo, M. N. (2009). Getting on the front page: Organizational reputation, status signals, and the impact of U.S. news and world report on student decisions. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 415–436. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9129-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, R. D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). The role of human resource systems in job applicant decision processes. Journal of Management, 20(3), 531–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A., Camburn, E., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 751–781. doi:10.1177/0013161X99355004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, T. (2014). Instructional and transformational leadership: Alternative and complementary models? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 443–444. doi:10.1177/1741143214526830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473–490. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, O., Chatman, J. A., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. (2010). Chinese middle school teacher job satisfaction and its relationships with teacher moving. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(3), 263–272. doi:10.1007/s12564-010-9085-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., & Zheng, Y. (2008). China’s regional disparity and its policy responses. China and World Economy, 16(4), 16–32. doi:10.1111/j.1749-124X.2008.00119.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323–337. doi:10.1080/00220973.1992.9943869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocco, M. S., & Costigan, A. T. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42(6), 512–535. doi:10.1177/0042085907304964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, T., Keeling, D., Grainger, R., & Grundies, A. (2008). Mutual benefits: New York City’s shift to mutual consent in teacher hiring. http://www.tntp.org/publications/Mutual_Benefits.html

  • Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B., & Singleton, C. A. (2006). Organizational commitment of teachers in urban schools: Examining the effects of team structures. Urban Education, 41(6), 603–627. doi:10.1177/0042085906292512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dello-Iacovo, B. (2009). Curriculum reform and “Quality Education” in China: An overview. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(3), 241–249. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulebohn, J. H., & Martocchio, J. J. (1998). Employee perceptions of the fairness of work group incentive pay plans. Journal of Management, 24(4), 469–488. doi:10.1177/014920639802400401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J., Dukerich, J., & Harquail, C. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263. doi:10.2307/2393235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, S., Johnson, J., Duffet, A., Foleno, T., & Foley, P. (2001). Trying to stay ahead of the Game: Superintendents and principals talk about school leadership. New York, NY: Public Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W. A., & Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 489–525. doi:10.3102/00346543063004489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Watson, N. (2000). School-based management: Reconceptualizing to improve learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(4), 453–473. doi:10.1076/sesi.11.4.453.3561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2003). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 228–256. doi:10.1108/09578230310474403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. G., Anderson, S. E., & Shivers, S. L. (1996). Demographic and organizational influences on leader-member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(2), 203–214. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., Link, S., & Woessmann, L. (2013). Does school autonomy make sense everywhere? Panel estimates from PISA. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 212–232. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J. Y. (2012). Why do some beginning teachers leave the school, and others stay? Understanding teacher resilience through psychological lenses. Teachers and Teaching, 18(4), 417–440. doi:10.1080/13540602.2012.696044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders' job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291–317. doi:10.1080/09243450902909840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2011). The relation between school leadership from a distributed perspective and teachers’ organizational commitment: Examing the source of the leadership function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 728–771. doi:10.1177/0013161X11402065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. (2005). The relation between culture and response styles: Evidence from 19 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(2), 264–277. doi:10.1177/0022022104272905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushman, J. W. (1992). The organizational dynamics of teacher workplace commitment: A study of urban elementary and middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1), 5–42. doi:10.1177/0013161X92028001002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, P. (2009). Beginning teachers’ perceptions of school human resource practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(3), 373–386. doi:10.1080/02188790903092878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E., Dedrick, R. F., & Smith, J. B. (1991). The effect of the social organization of schools on teachers’ efficacy and satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64(3), 190–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2009). A review of empirical evidence about school size effects: A Policy perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 464–490. doi:10.3102/0034654308326158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z. (1986). “Lun tigao zhong xiao xue jiaoshi de zhiye diwei” (On raising the professional status of secondary and elementary school teachers). Jiaoyu yanjiu, 9, 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W., & Bartlett, L. (2002). Career and commitment in the context of comprehensive school reform. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Dunne, M. (2009). Educational reform in China: Tensions in national policy and local practice. Comparative Education, 45(4), 461–476. doi:10.1080/03050060903391594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Liu, C., Stronge, J., & Xu, X. (2016). Teacher characteristics for success in the classroom: Chinese principals’ perceptions for hiring decisions. Asia Pacific Education Review,. doi:10.1007/s12564-015-9412-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2012). Chinese teachers’ work stress and their turnover intention. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 160–170. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315–336. doi:10.1080/09243453.2010.486586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslowski, R. (2001). School culture and school performance: An explorative study into the organizational culture of secondary schools and their effects. Twente: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslowski, R., Scheerens, J., & Luyten, H. (2007). The effect of school autonomy and school internal decentralization on students’ reading literacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(3), 303–334. doi:10.1080/09243450601147502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, N., & Welsh, T. (1999). Decentralization of education: Why, when, what, and how? Paris: UNESCO. http://www.see-educoop.net/education_in/pdf/decentr_educ_why_when_what_how_oth_enl_t07.pdf

  • Meyer, J. P., Paunonen, S. V., Gellatly, I. R., Goffin, R. D., & Jackson, D. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It’s the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 152–156. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Personnel (2005). Interim regulations for government-run institutions to recruit staff. Retrieved November 21, 2015, from http://www.mohrss.gov.cn/gkml/xxgk/201407/t20140717_136271.html?keywords=.

  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2014). China statistics yearbook. Beijing: China statistics press. http://data.stats.gov.cn/

  • Ngok, K. L. (2007). Chinese education policy in the context of decentralization and marketization: Evolution and implications. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(1), 142–157. doi:10.1007/BF03025840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguni, S., Sleegers, P., & Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers’ job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 145–177. doi:10.1080/09243450600565746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nir, A. E. (2002). School-based management and its effect on teacher commitment. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 5(4), 323–341. doi:10.1080/13603120210134616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010). Shanghai and Hong Kong: Two distinct examples of education reform in China. In Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States (pp. 83–115). OECD Publishing. http://wrksolutions.com/employer/education/research/OECD-NCEE-report.pdf

  • OECD. (2014). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. OECD Publishing,. doi:10.1787/9789264196261-en.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. W., & Fang, Y. (2006). Reform as hybrid model of teaching and teacher development in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 279–289. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2007.02.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, M., & Mok, K. H. (2008). Reasserting the public in public service delivery: The de-privatization and de-marketization of education in China. Policy and Society, 27(2), 137–150. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2008.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business and Society, 43(3), 296–319. doi:10.1177/0007650304268065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Printy, S. M., Marks, H. M., & Bowers, A. J. (2009). Integrated leadership: How principals and teachers share transformational and instructional influence. Journal of School Leadership, 19, 504–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, S., & Sprietsma, M. (2003). Characteristics of teaching institutions and students’ performance: New empirical evidence from OECD data (No. 28). Leuven: Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, Z. (2001). Teachers’ multiple roles and skill flexibility: Effects on work attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 684–708. doi:10.1177/00131610121969479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Workplace conditions that affect teacher quality and commitment: implications for teacher induction programs. The Elementary School Journal, 89(4), 421–439. doi:10.2307/1001780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, T., & Hannum, E. (2005). Keeping teachers happy: Job satisfaction among primary school teachers in rural Northwest China. Comparative Education Review, 49(2), 173–204. doi:10.1086/428100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, A., Zimmer, K., Evans, J., & Clements, N. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264062658-en.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. (1996). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 325–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059–1069. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, M. C. (1996). Financial reform of basic education in China. Economics of Education Review, 15(4), 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B., Forret, M. L., & Hendrickson, C. L. (1998). Applicant attraction to firms: Influences of organization reputation, job and organizational attributes, and recruiter behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(1), 24–44. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Education. (1997). Teacher professionalization and teacher commitment: A multilevel analysis. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, C., & Tremblay, M. (2008). The role of pay satisfaction and organizational commitment in turnover intentions: A two-sample study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(3), 275–286. doi:10.1007/s10869-008-9063-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieno, A., Perkins, D. D., Smith, T. M., & Santinello, M. (2005). Democratic school climate and sense of community in school: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(3–4), 327–341. doi:10.1007/s10464-005-8629-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Zhao, Z. (2010). Xibu diqu zhongxiaoxue jiaoshi zuzhi chengnuo diaocha yanjiu (A study on primary and middle school teachers’ organizational commitment in west regions). Jiaoyu xuebao, 6(5), 96–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, H., & Kitsantas, A. (2007). Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs as predictors of professional commitment. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 303–310. doi:10.3200/JOER.100.5.303-310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wöbmann, L., Lüdemann, E., Schütz, G., & West, M. R. (2007). Autonomy, choice, and the level of student achievement: International evidence from PISA 2003 (No. 13). Germany: Munich. doi:10.1787/246402531617.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woessmann, L., Luedemann, E., Schuetz, G., & West, M. R. (2009). School accountability, autonomy, and choice around the world. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. E. (2003). Do reverse worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer research? The case of the material values scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 72–91. doi:10.1086/374697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, S., & Liu, J. (1998). Economic reforms and regional segmentation in rural China. Regional Studies, 32(8), 735–746. doi:10.1080/00343409850119427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, H. (2013). Societal culture and teachers’ responses to curriculum reform: Experiences from China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(3), 391–401. doi:10.1007/s12564-013-9266-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L. (2009). Between local community and central state: Financing basic education in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(4), 366–373. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & Reed, L. (2005). Chinese government documents on teacher education since the 1980s. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 31(3), 201–213. doi:10.1080/02607470500169030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zigarelli, M. (1996). An empirical test of conclusions from effective schools research. Journal of Educational Research, 90(2), 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Ghent University under Grant B/11705/02.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Educational Studies, Ghent University, H. Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Diya Dou, Geert Devos & Martin Valcke

Authors
  1. Diya Dou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Geert Devos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Valcke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diya Dou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dou, D., Devos, G. & Valcke, M. The effects of autonomy gap in personnel policy, principal leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy on their organizational commitment. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 17, 339–353 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9428-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9428-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation