Skip to main content
Log in

Reimbursement for teledermatology in the United States: a review

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Health and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many individuals do not have adequate access to dermatologic care. Teledermatology stands as a potential method of increasing access to dermatologic care. However, one of the biggest obstacles to the expansion of teledermatology is reimbursement. Policies for reimbursement vary based on the insurer, the state, and even the city. In general, there is a lack of federal funding for teledermatology, but various contained systems—such as the Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense, Department of Corrections, and academic medical centers – have used teledermatology sustainably. Whereas live-interactive teledermatology can often qualify for federal reimbursement, store-and-forward teledermatology (with some exceptions) typically cannot. Over the past decade, the number of active teledermatology programs has significantly decreased, and reimbursement difficulty is most likely a contributing factor. More uniform policies by organizations like Medicaid and private payers would enable a greater expansion of teledermatology services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Uhlenhake E, Brodell R, Mostow E. The dermatology work force: a focus on urban versus rural wait times. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61(1):17–22. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.09.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Camacho F, Balkrishnan R, Khanna V, Khanna K, Feldman SR. How Happy Are Dermatologists’ Patients? The Dermatologist. 2013;21(4).

  3. Ogbechie OA, Nambudiri VE, Vleugels RA. Teledermatology perception differences between urban primary care physicians and dermatologists. JAMA Dermatol. 2014. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3331.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong AW, Kwong MW, Ledo L, Nesbitt TS, Shewry SL. Practice models and challenges in teledermatology: a study of collective experiences from teledermatologists. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28687. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pak HS, Edison KE, Whited JD. Teledermatology: a user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. HRSA. What are the reimbursement issues for telehealth? 2014. http://www.hrsa.gov/healthit/toolbox/RuralHealthITtoolbox/Telehealth/whatarethereimbursement.html. Accessed August 12 2014.

  7. Jesitus J. Conflicting language about Medicare reimbursement stalls teledermatology. Dermatology Times 2011.

  8. CTeL. 50 State Medicaid Statute Survey. 2011. http://ctel.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/CTeL-50-State-Medicaid-Statute-Survey-Part-I.pdf.

  9. California Telehealth Resource Center. Telemedicine Reimbursement Guide. 2014.

  10. AMD. Private Payer Reimbursement Information Directory. 2002.

  11. Ebner C, Wurm EM, Binder B, Kittler H, Lozzi GP, Massone C, et al. Mobile teledermatology: a feasibility study of 58 subjects using mobile phones. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(1):2–7. doi:10.1258/jtt.2007.070302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bezalel S, Fabri P, Park HS. Implementation of store-and-forward teledermatology and its associated effect on patient access in a veterans affairs dermatology clinic. JAMA Dermatol. 2015. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.5272.

    Google Scholar 

  13. English III JC, Gehris R, Leyva W. Add Pittsburgh teledermatology “with a twist” to the map! J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(6):1042. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.11.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Whited J. Summary of the status of teledermatology research. Teledermatology Special Interest Group. American Telemedicine Association. 2011.

  15. Hersh WR, Hickam DH, Severance SM, Dana TL, Krages KP, Helfand M. Telemedicine for the medicare population: update. AHRQuality; 2006.

  16. Whited JD, Datta S, Hall RP, Foy ME, Marbrey LE, Grambow SC, et al. An economic analysis of a store and forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J e-Health : Off J Am Telemed Assoc. 2003;9(4):351–60. doi:10.1089/153056203772744671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pak HS, Datta SK, Triplett CA, Lindquist JH, Grambow SC, Whited JD. Cost minimization analysis of a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J e-Health : Off J Am Telemed Assoc. 2009;15(2):160–5. doi:10.1089/tmj.2008.0083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Armstrong AW, Dorer DJ, Lugn NE, Kvedar JC. Economic evaluation of interactive teledermatology compared with conventional care. Telemed J e-Health : Off J Am Telemed Assoc. 2007;13(2):91–9. doi:10.1089/tmj.2006.0035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Armstrong AW, Wu J, Kovarik CL, Goldyne ME, Oh DH, McKoy KC, et al. State of teledermatology programs in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(5):939–44. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fieleke DR, Edison K, Dyer JA. Pediatric teledermatology–a survey of current use. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008;25(2):158–62. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00624.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fogel AL, Teng JM. Pediatric teledermatology: a survey of usage, perspectives, and practice. Pediatr Dermatol. 2015. doi:10.1111/pde.12533.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding/Support

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan E. Mayer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayer, J.E. Reimbursement for teledermatology in the United States: a review. Health Technol. 5, 67–71 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-015-0103-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-015-0103-5

Keywords

Navigation