Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of optimal welding condition for GTA pulse welding in root-pass of V-groove butt joint

  • Published:
Metals and Materials International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the manufacture of high-quality welds or pipeline, a full-penetration weld has to be made along the weld joint. Therefore, root-pass welding is very important, and its conditions have to be selected carefully. In this study, an experimental method for the selection of optimal welding conditions is proposed for gas tungsten arc (GTA) pulse welding in the root pass which is done along the V-grooved butt-weld joint. This method uses response surface analysis in which the width and height of back bead are chosen as quality variables of the weld. The overall desirability function, which is the combined desirability function for the two quality variables, is used as the objective function to obtain the optimal welding conditions. In our experiments, the target values of back bead width and height are 4 mm and zero, respectively, for a V-grooved butt-weld joint of a 7-mm-thick steel plate. The optimal welding conditions could determine the back bead profile (bead width and height) as 4.012 mm and 0.02 mm. From a series of welding tests, it was revealed that a uniform and full-penetration weld bead can be obtained by adopting the optimal welding conditions determined according to the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. B. Cary, Modern Welding Technology,, 3 rd ed., p. 73–80, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. D. Park, Welding Engineering, p. 38–48, Wonchang, Incheon, Korea (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Senthil Kumar, V. Balasubramanian, S. Babu, and M.Y. Sanavullah, Met. Mater. Int. 13, 345 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N. I. Kim, S. H. Jeong, J.S. Lee, S. W. Kang, and M. H. Kim, J. Kor. Inst. Met. & Mater. 47, 195 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. C. E. Bull, K. A. Stacey, and R. Calcraft, J. Nondestruct. Test. 35, 57 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. M. Zhang, R. Kovacevic, and L. Li, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu. 36–77, 799 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. D. Starling, V. Marques, and J. Modenesi, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 51, 37 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. X. M. Zeng, J. Lucas, and M. T. C. Fang, T. I. Meas. Control 15, 87 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. S. Tarng and W. H. Yang, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 14, 549 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. H. Myers and D. C. Montgomery, Response Surface Methodology, Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, p. 208–278, John Wiley & Sons Inc. (1995).

  11. M. Balasubramanian, V. Jayabalan, and V. Balasubramanian, Met. Mater. Int. 13, 335 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Derringer and R. Suich, J. Qual. Technol. 12, 214 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. D. Casttilo, D. C. Montgomery, and D. R. Mccarville, J. Qual. Technol. 28, 337 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Woong Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yun, SC., Kim, JW. Selection of optimal welding condition for GTA pulse welding in root-pass of V-groove butt joint. Met. Mater. Int. 16, 975–980 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-010-1218-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-010-1218-x

Key words

Navigation