Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of Shoreline Change Trends and Adaptation of Selangor Coastline, Using Landsat Satellite Data

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shoreline change analysis of Selangor was studied from Landsat satellite multispectral images taken during the years 1990–2015 and was analyzed using the digital shoreline analysis system technique. The results show that almost 51% of the total analyzed shoreline length experienced erosion. By comparing the average erosion rate between 5 coastal districts of Selangor, Kuala Selangor recorded the highest average erosion rate − 3.50 m/yr (endpoint rate) or − 3.64 m/yr (linear regression rate). The highest erosion rate for the entire Selangor coast was recorded in Kuala Selangor district coast with − 18.61 m/yr (endpoint rate) and − 19.78 m/yr (linear regression rate); these readings were recorded at Sungai Yu transect. Kuala Langat has been identified as the coastal district that has the highest percentages of erosion. (Thirty-nine percentage of total transects along Kuala Langat showed accretion.) Coastal adaptive capacity assessment of Selangor coastline indicates that about 123.05 km of the total analyzed shoreline length (327.23 km) has a low adaptive capacity (eroded), 40.18 km of the shoreline have a medium adaptive capacity (eroded) and 164 km of the shoreline has a high adaptive capacity of long-term shoreline trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addo, K. A., Jayson-Quashigah, P. N., & Kufogbe, K. S. (2011). Quantitative analysis of shoreline change using medium resolution satellite imagery in Keta. Ghana Marine Science, 1(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmawi, M. Z., & Ibrahim, A. N. (2013). Quantitative analysis of shoreline change using medium resolution satellite imagery in Keta. Malaysia Journal of Clean Energy Technology, 1(3), 164–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, H. K., & Hamdan, O (2008). Coastal erosion mapping and impact assessment using remote sensing and GIS-A case study in selangor. Proc. 3rd regional symposium on environment and natural resources, 5–6 August, Prince Hotel, Kuala Lumpur.

  • Boak, E. H., & Turner, I. L. (2005). Shoreline definition and detection: A review. Journal of Coastal Research, 21(4), 688–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPU (1985). National Coastal study, Phase 1. Final Report. Stanley consultants Ltd, Mofatt & Nicho; Engineering and Jurutera consultants (S.E.A) Sdn Bhd, Malaysia.

  • Ghazali, N. M. (2006). Coastal erosion and reclamation in Malaysia. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management., 9(2), 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hapke, C. J., Reid, D., Richmond, B. M., Ruggiero, P. & List, J. (2006). National assessment of shoreline change: Part 3: Historical shoreline changes and associated coastal land loss along the sandy shorelines of the California coast: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006–1219. p. 72.

  • Hapke, C. J., Himmelstoss, E. A., Kratzman, M. G., List, J. H. & Thieler, E. R. (2010). National assessment of shoreline change: Historical shoreline change along the New England and Mid-Atlantic Coasts. U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report, 2010-1118. Harbors Division. 88, pp. 117–130.

  • Himmelstoss, E. A. (2009). DSAS 4.0 Installation Instructions and user guide. In: Thieler, E. R., Himmelstoss, E. A., Zichichi, J. L. & Ergul, A. (Eds.) Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) Version 4.0. An ArcGIS extension for calculating shoreline change. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report. pp 2008–1278.

  • Ibrahim, I., Asmawi, M. Z. & Jaafar, S. (2016). Temporal geospatial shorelines changes analysis in Klang coastal Area. In: International Conference on Architecture & Built Environment (ICABE 2016), 5th–6th Oct, Kuala Lumpur (Unpublished).

  • Lee, H. L., Kathigayen, V. & Mozie, A. S. (2010). A case study on mangroves replanting site at Sg. Haji Dorani, Selangor. pp. 110–119, In: Ahmad Jamalluddin, S., Mohd. Fauzi, M. & Lee, H.L (eds). Proceedings of the National Seminar on Coastal Morphology (COSMO) 2010 The Muddy Coast of Malaysia. 17 June, NAHRIM, Kuala Lumpur.

  • Mohamad, F. M., Lee, H. L., & Samion, M. K. H. (2014). Coastal vulnerability assessment towards sustainable management of peninsular malaysia coastline. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5(6), 533–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L. J. (2000). Shoreline mapping techniques. Journal of Coastal Research, 16(1), 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRE (2008). Report on national capacity needs self-assessment for global environmental management and national capacity action plan. Government of Malaysia, ministry of natural resources and environment, Malaysia.

  • Schwartz, M. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of earth sciences series (pp. 323–325). Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W., Moore, L. R., Harris, W. M. & Reed, M. D. (2003). Using the landsat 7 enhanced thematic mapper tasseled cap transformation to extract shoreline. Open-File Report of 03–272 U.S. Geological Survey.

  • Siringan, F. P., Maria, M. Y. Y. S., Licuanan, W. R. Y., Samson, M. S., & Rollon, R. N. (2012). Coastal integrity vulnerability assessment tool version 1.0: A primer marine environment and resources foundation, Inc. (p. 20). Quezon City: University of the Philippines Diliman, Marine Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teh, T. S., & Yap, H. B. (2010). Malaysia-Introduction. In E. Bird (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Worlds Coastal Landforms (p. 1117). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCES (1986). Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Malaysia. Retrieved from web site: https://www.water.gov.my

  • Thieler, E. R., Himmelstoss, E. A., Zichichi, J. L. & Ergul, A. (2009). Digital shoreline analysis system (DSAS) version 4.0. An ArcGIS extension for calculating shoreline change: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1278.

  • Yamamoto, K. H., & Finn, M. P. (2012). Approximating tasseled cap values to evaluate brightness, greenness, and wetness for the advanced land imager (ALI): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report. 2012–5057, 9.

  • Zamali, M. (1988). Coastal erosion problems and solutions. In: Proceedings of the 11th annual seminar of the Malaysian society of marine sciences. pp. 23–31.

  • Zviely, D., Kit, E., Rosen, B., Galili, E., & Klein, M. (2009). Shoreline migration and beach-nearshore sand balance over the last 200 years in Haifa Bay (SE Mediterranean). Geo-Marine Letters, 29, 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to thank FRIM, ISB and IOES (University of Malaya) and Prof. Fernando Siringan (University of the Philippines). This work was supported by the University of Malaya [RU006G-2014] and the Forest Research Institute of Malaysia [GA002-2015].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pozi Milow.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1156 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daud, S., Milow, P. & Zakaria, R.M. Analysis of Shoreline Change Trends and Adaptation of Selangor Coastline, Using Landsat Satellite Data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 49, 1869–1878 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01218-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01218-0

Keywords

Navigation