Abstract
Morphometric parameters are important elements in water and land resource management studies. In this study, 23 morphometric parameters of drainage networks were extracted using a Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM)–based digital elevation model (DEM), an Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER)–based DEM, a 1:25,000 scale topographical map (TOPO)–based DEM, an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) –based DEM and an airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR)–based DEM. Generally, LiDAR sensors provide more accurate results than other DEM sources, and for that reason, we used LiDAR-based DEM data as a reference for comparing results of analyses made by the other DEM sources. According to the results, as resolution increases, many morphometric parameter values also tend to increase. In addition, for all of the morphometric parameter values (basic, derived and shape), the values obtained using the TOPO, UAV, ASTER and SRTM DEMs closely resembled the values obtained using LiDAR DEM-based parameters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams M, Crippen R (2019) ASTER GDEM V3 (ASTER Global DEM) User Guide Version 1: California Institute of Technology, Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Ahmed SA, Chandrashekarappa KN, Raj SK, Nischitha V, Kavitha G (2010) Evaluation of morphometric parameters derived from ASTER and SRTM DEM—a study on Bandihole sub-watershed basin in Karnataka. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38:227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-010-0029-3
Aouragh MH, Essahlaoui A (2014) Morphometric analysis of a Guigou Sub-watershed, Sebou basin, Middle Atlas, Morocco using GIS based ASTER (DEM) image. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 3:11503–11512
Ardiansyah POD, Yokoyama R (2002) DEM generation method from contour lines based on the steepest slope segment chain and a monotone interpolation function. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 57:86–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00117-X
Ariza-Villaverde AB, Jiménez-Hornero FJ, De Ravé EG (2015) Influence of DEM resolution on drainage network extraction: a multifractal analysis. Geomorphology 241:243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.040
Aryal RR, Latifi H, Heurich M, Hahn M (2017) Impact of slope, aspect, and habitat-type on LiDAR-derived digital terrain models in a near natural, heterogeneous temperate forest. PFG–Journal Photogramm Remote Sens Geoinformation Sci 85:243–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-017-0023-2
Ashmawy MH, El-Wahed MAA, Kamh SZ, Shebl A (2018) Comparative study of the drainage basin morphometry extracted from topographic maps and SRTM DEMs: an example from Ghadir watershed, Eastern Desert, Egypt. Delta J Sci 39:1–14
A-Xing ZHU, SMITH M, Rongxun W, Jing GAO (2008) The impact of neighbourhood size on terrain derivatives and digital soil mapping. ln: Zhou Q., Lees B., Tang G. (ed) Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 333–348
Balasubramanian A, Duraisamy K, Thirumalaisamy S, Krishnaraj S, Yatheendradasan RK (2017) Prioritization of subwatersheds based on quantitative morphometric analysis in lower Bhavani basin, Tamil Nadu, India using DEM and GIS techniques. Arab J Geosci 10:552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3312-6
Bali R, Agarwal KK, Ali SN, Rastogi SK, Krishna K (2012) Drainage morphometry of Himalayan Glacio-fluvial basin, India: hydrologic and neotectonic implications. Environ Earth Sci 66:1163–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1324-1
Bardossy A, Schmidt F (2002) GIS approach to scale issues of perimeter-based shape indices for drainage basins. Hydrol Sci J. 47:931–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660209493001
Baugh CA, Bates PD, Schumann G, Trigg MA (2013) SRTM vegetation removal and hydrodynamic modeling accuracy. Water Resour Res 49:5276–5289. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20412
Bhagwat TN, Shetty A, Hegde VS (2011) Spatial variation in drainage characteristics and geomorphic instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH); implications for watershed management—a case study of the Varada River basin, Northern Karnataka. Catena 87:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.05.007
Boulton SJ, Stokes M (2018) Which DEM is best for analyzing fluvial landscape development in mountainous terrains? Geomorphology 310:168–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.002
Chopra R, Dhiman RD, Sharma PK (2005) Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in Gurdaspur district, Punjab using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33:531–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990738
Das S, Patel PP, Sengupta S (2016) Evaluation of different digital elevation models for analyzing drainage morphometric parameters in a mountainous terrain: a case study of the Supin–Upper Tons Basin, Indian Himalayas. SpringerPlus 5:1544. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3207-0
Farhan Y (2017) Morphometric assessment of Wadi Wala watershed, southern Jordan using ASTER (DEM) and GIS. J Geogr Inf Syst 9:158–190. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2017.92011
Fleming C, Marsh SH, Giles JRA (2010) Elevation models for geoscience. Special Publications, London, Geological Society
Florinsky I (2016) Digital terrain analysis in soil science and geology. Academic Press, Amsterdam
Florinsky IV, Kurkov VM, Bliakharskii DP (2018) Geomorphometry from unmanned aerial surveys. Trans GIS 22:58–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12296
Gayen S, Bhunia GS, Shit PK (2013) Morphometric analysis of Kangshabati-Darkeswar Interfluves area in West Bengal, India using ASTER DEM and GIS techniques. J Geol Geosci 2:1–10. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6755.1000133
Hadley RF, Schumm SA (1961) Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne River basin. US Geol Surv Water-Supply Pap. 1531:198
Haile AT, Rientjes THM (2005) Effects of LiDAR DEM resolution in flood modelling: a model sensitivity study for the city of Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Isprs Wg iii3 iii4 3: 12–14.
Hancock GR, Martinez C, Evans KG, Moliere DR (2006) A comparison of SRTM and high-resolution digital elevation models and their use in catchment geomorphology and hydrology: Australian examples. Earth Surf Process Landf J Br Geomorphol Res Group 31:1394–1412. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1335
Hengl T (2006) Finding the right pixel size. Comput Geosci 32:1283–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.11.008
Höfle B, Rutzinger M (2011) Topographic airborne LiDAR in geomorphology: a technological perspective. Z Für Geomorphol Suppl 55:1–29
Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 56:275–370. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2
Hutchinson MF (1989) A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits. J Hydrol 106:211–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90073-5
Hutchinson MF, Xu T, Stein JA (2011) Recent progress in the ANUDEM elevation gridding procedure. Geomorphometry 2011:19–22
Javed A, Khanday MY, Ahmed R (2009) Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37:261–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-009-0016-8
Kasi V, Pinninti R, Landa SR, Rathinasamy M, Sangamreddi C, Kuppili RR, Dandu Radha PR (2020) Comparison of different digital elevation models for drainage morphometric parameters: a case study from South India. Arab J Geosci 13:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06049-4
Kusre BC (2016) Morphometric analysis of Diyung watershed in northeast India using GIS technique for flood management. J Geol Soc India 87:361–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-016-0403-z
Li Z, Zhu C, Gold C (2004) Digital terrain modeling: principles and methodology. CRC press, Boca Raton
Li X, Shen H, Feng R, Li J, Zhang L (2017) DEM generation from contours and a low-resolution DEM. ISPRS J. Photogramm Remote Sens 134:135–147
Martz LW, Garbrecht J (1992) Numerical definition of drainage network and subcatchment areas from digital elevation models. Comput Geosci 18:747–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(92)90007-E
Meng X, Currit N, Zhao K (2010) Ground filtering algorithms for airborne LiDAR data: a review of critical issues. Remote Sens 2:833–860. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2030833
Mesa LM (2006) Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucuman, Argentina). Environ Geol 50:1235–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0297-y
Miller VC (1953) Quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. Tech. Rep. Columbia Univ. Dep. Geol. No 3
Miller JR, Kochel RC (2010) Assessment of channel dynamics, in-stream structures and post-project channel adjustments in North Carolina and its implications to effective stream restoration. Environ Earth Sci 59:1681–1692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0150-1
Mokarram M, Hojati M (2017) Morphometric analysis of stream as one of resources for agricultural lands irrigation using high spatial resolution of digital elevation model (DEM). Comput Electron Agric 142:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.001
Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050103
Moussa R (2009) Definition of new equivalent indices of Horton-Strahler ratios for the derivation of the Geomorphological Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph. Water Resour Res 45:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007330
Munoth P, Goyal R (2019) Effects of DEM source, spatial resolution and drainage area threshold values on hydrological modeling. Water Resour Manag 33:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02303-x
Murphy PN, Ogilvie J, Meng FR, Arp P (2008) Stream network modelling using lidar and photogrammetric digital elevation models: a comparison and field verification. Hydrol Process Int J 22:1747–1754. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6770
Nautiyal MD (1994) Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin using aerial photographs: a case study of Khairkuli basin, district Dehradun, UP. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 22:251–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026526
Nooka Ratnam K, Srivastava YK, Venkateswara Rao V, Amminedu E, Murthy KSR (2005) Check dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis — remote sensing and GIS perspective. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02989988
Obi Reddy GE, Maji AK, Gajbhiye KS (2002) GIS for morphometric analysis of drainage basins. GIS India 11:9–14
Ozdemir H, Bird D (2009) Evaluation of morphometric parameters of drainage networks derived from topographic maps and DEM in point of floods. Environ Geol 56:1405–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1235-y
Pandule AM (2019) Morphometric Analysis of Sina basin using GIS and remote sensing techniques. Int Res J Eng Technol 6:5212–5229
Pankaj A, Kumar P (2009) GIS-based morphometric analysis of five major sub-watersheds of Song River, Dehradun District, Uttarakhand with special reference to landslide incidences. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-009-0007-9
Patel DP, Gajjar CA, Srivastava PK (2013) Prioritization of Malesari mini-watersheds through morphometric analysis: a remote sensing and GIS perspective. Environ Earth Sci 69:2643–2656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2086-0
Petroselli A (2012) LIDAR data and hydrological applications at the basin scale. GIScience Remote Sens 49:139–162. https://doi.org/10.2747/1548-1603.49.1.139
Polat N, Uysal M (2015) Investigating performance of airborne LiDAR data filtering algorithms for DTM generation. Measurement 63:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.12.017
Prasad RK, Mondal NC, Banerjee P, Nandakumar MV, Singh VS (2008) Deciphering potential groundwater zone in hard rock through the application of GIS. Environ Geol 55:467–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0992-3
Prasannakumar V, Vijith H, Geetha N (2013) Terrain evaluation through the assessment of geomorphometric parameters using DEM and GIS: case study of two major sub-watersheds in Attapady, South India. Arab J Geosci 6:1141–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-011-0408-2
Rai PK, Mohan K, Mishra S, Ahmad A, Mishra VN (2017) A GIS-based approach in drainage morphometric analysis of Kanhar River Basin, India. Appl Water Sci 7:217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0238-y
Rai PK, Chandel RS, Mishra VN, Singh P (2018) Hydrological inferences through morphometric analysis of lower Kosi river basin of India for water resource management based on remote sensing data. Appl Water Sci 8:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0660-7
Saha A, Singh P (2017) Drainage morphometric analysis and water resource management of Hindon River basin, using Earth Observation Data Sets. Int J Interdiscip Res IJIR 3:2051–2057
Samal DR, Gedam SS, Nagarajan R (2015) GIS based drainage morphometry and its influence on hydrology in parts of Western Ghats region, Maharashtra, India. Geocarto Int 30:755–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2014.978903
Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull 67:597–646. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2
Shannon CE (1984) Communication in the presence of noise. Proc IEEE 72:1192–1201
Sharma S, Mahajan AK (2020) GIS-based sub-watershed prioritization through morphometric analysis in the outer Himalayan region of India. Appl Water Sci 10:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01243-x
Sharma SK, Tignath S, Mishra SK (2008) Morphometric analysis of drainage basin using GIS approach. JNKVV Res Jour 42:91–95
Singh AP, Arya AK, Singh DS (2020) Morphometric analysis of Ghaghara River Basin, India, using SRTM data and GIS. J Geol Soc India 95:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-020-1406-3
Sreedevi PD, Owais S, Khan HH, Ahmed S (2009) Morphometric analysis of a watershed of South India using SRTM data and GIS. J Geol Soc India 73:543–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-009-0038-4
Sreedevi PD, Sreekanth PD, Khan HH, Ahmed S (2013) Drainage morphometry and its influence on hydrology in an semi arid region: using SRTM data and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 70:839–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2172-3
Strahler AN (1952) Dynamic basis of geomorphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 63:923–938
Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. Handb. Appl. Hydrol. Chow VT Ed McGraw Hill N. Y. 40–74.
Sujatha ER, Selvakumar R, Rajasimman UAB, Victor RG (2015) Morphometric analysis of sub-watershed in parts of Western Ghats, South India using ASTER DEM. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 6:326–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2013.845114
Thomas J, Prasannakumar V (2015) Comparison of basin morphometry derived from topographic maps, ASTER and SRTM DEMs: an example from Kerala, India. Geocarto Int 30:346–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2014.955063
Thomas J, Joseph S, Thrivikramji KP, Abe G, Kannan N (2012) Morphometrical analysis of two tropical mountain river basins of contrasting environmental settings, the southern Western Ghats, India. Environ Earth Sci 66:2353–2366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1457-2
Vieceli N, Bortolin TA, Mendes LA, Bacarim G, Cemin G, Schneider VE (2015) Morphometric evaluation of watersheds in Caxias do Sul City, Brazil, using SRTM (DEM) data and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 73:5677–5685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3823-3
Vijith H, Seling LW, Dodge-Wan D (2015) Comparison and suitability of SRTM and ASTER digital elevation data for terrain analysis and geomorphometric parameters: case study of Sungai Patah subwatershed (Baram River, Sarawak, Malaysia). Environ. Res. Eng. Manag. 71:23–35. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.71.3.12566
Walczak Z, Sojka M, Wróżyński R, Laks I (2016) Estimation of polder retention capacity based on ASTER, SRTM and LIDAR DEMs: The case of Majdany Polder (West Poland). Water 8:230. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8060230
Wallace L, Lucieer A, Watson C, Turner D (2012) Development of a UAV-LiDAR system with application to forest inventory. Remote Sens 4:1519–1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4061519
Wang S, Ren Z, Wu C, Lei Q, Gong W, Ou Q, Zhang H, Ren G, Li C (2019) DEM generation from Worldview-2 stereo imagery and vertical accuracy assessment for its application in active tectonics. Geomorphology 336:107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.03.016
Wilford DJ, Sakals ME, Innes JL, Sidle RC, Bergerud WA (2004) Recognition of debris flow, debris flood and flood hazard through watershed morphometrics. Landslides 1:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-003-0002-0
Wilson JP, Fotheringham AS (2008) The handbook of geographic information science. Blackwell
Wu M, Shi P, Chen A, Shen C, Wang P (2017) Impacts of DEM resolution and area threshold value uncertainty on the drainage network derived using SWAT. Water Sa 43:450–462. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v43i3.10
Yan K, Di Baldassarre G, Solomatine DP, Schumann GJP (2015) A review of low-cost space-borne data for flood modelling: topography, flood extent and water level. Hydrol Process 29:3368–3387. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10449
Yurtseven H (2019) Comparison of ASTER, contour lines and LiDAR based DEMs in terms of topographic differences in forested area. Eurasian J For Sci 7: 166–186. 10.31195/ejejfs.597460
Yurtseven H, Akgul M, Coban S, Gulci S (2019) Determination and accuracy analysis of individual tree crown parameters using UAV based imagery and OBIA techniques. Measurement. 145:651–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.092
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that helped us improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Biswajeet Pradhan
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Esin, A.İ., Akgul, M., Akay, A.O. et al. Comparison of LiDAR-based morphometric analysis of a drainage basin with results obtained from UAV, TOPO, ASTER and SRTM-based DEMs. Arab J Geosci 14, 340 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06705-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06705-3