Skip to main content
Log in

Groundwater Quality Variation Assessment Indices

  • Published:
Water Quality, Exposure and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater quality variations can be assessed by classical graphical representations such as the trilinear (Piper), Durov, Schoeller, Wilcox, Stiff and similar diagrams for overall quality variations. Each one of these techniques is restrictive in some sense, and it is not always possible to trace trends in the variation. Some of these do not allow a representation of more than three ions. If two or more samples have ion concentrations that are individually proportional, then their distinctive representations are not possible and they fall for instance on the trilinear and Durov representations on the same point. Statistical approaches are available but they also require restrictive assumptions such as the independence of different ion concentrations in time or space and Gaussian probability distribution. The conventional water quality index (WQI) is strongly dependent on various correlated parameters and also identification of the suitability of the parameters is critical for accurate evaluation. In this paper various simple WQI calculations are proposed on the basis of anion-cation association matrix. Different association matrices are defined based on the association by taking into consideration mean, maximum, minimum and correlation fundamentals. The association matrix definitions of WQI help to identify a set of associations between cations and anions. The application of the methodology is presented for a set of groundwater samples that are taken during 2000–2005 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cannon WA (1949) A tentative classification of root systems. Ecology 30:542–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis SN, De Weist RJ (1966) Hydrogeology. Wiley, New York, p 463

    Google Scholar 

  • Hem JD (1970) Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water. US Geol Survey Water Supply Paper 1473, p 363

  • Hiscock KM, Dennis PF, Saynor PR, Thomas MO (1996) Hydrochemical and stable isotope evidence for the extent and nature of the effective chalk aquifer of north Norfolk, UK. J Hydrol 180:92–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper AM (1953) A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analysis. Trans - Am Geophys Union 25:914–923

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiff HA (1951) The interpretation of chemical water analysis by means of patterns. J Pet Technol 3:15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Şen Z (2004) Hydrochemical evaluation interpretations, triple diagrams and nitrate reduction model for Zamzam Water. Saudi Geological Survey, Confidential Report

  • Şen Z, Al-Dakheel A (1986) Hydrochemical facies evaluation in Umm Er Radhuma Limstone, Eastern Saudi Arabia. Ground Water, 24(5), 626–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1996) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 2nd edn., vol 2. Health criteria and other supporting information. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox LV (1955) Classification and use of irrigation waters. US Department of Agriculture, Circular No 969, p 19

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zekai Şen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Şen, Z. Groundwater Quality Variation Assessment Indices. Water Qual Expo Health 3, 127–133 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-011-0050-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-011-0050-y

Keywords

Navigation