Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Communities, Quarries and Geoheritage—Making the Connections

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Successful geoconservation increasingly depends on securing understanding and support from local communities and the decision makers within them. As most people do not understand geoscience, value geoheritage, or support geoconservation, it is extremely important that ways of raising awareness of geoheritage and building support for conservation are found. Connecting communities to their geoheritage is central to achieving this, and can be done in a variety of ways. Quarries and quarrying, including mines and mining, are perhaps the most effective means of engaging communities with their geoheritage as every quarry is ‘man-made’, and as such has a cultural connection with the community that worked it. Using examples from England, different connections between communities, quarries and geoheritage are described, and ways of making these connections are explored. Innovative approaches to making these links, such as those that involve physical engagement and activities with the community, and which contribute to a wider social agenda, are highlighted. The concept of an Anthropocene epoch, emphasising the links between society and its visible impact on the natural environment, including the geological record, provides a new context within which to use quarries to link communities to their geoheritage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bassett MG (1982) ‘Formed stones’ folklore and fossils. National Museum of Wales, Geological Series, 1

  • Bevins RE, Ixer RA, Pearce NJG (2014) Carn Goedog is the likely major source of Stonehenge doleritic bluestones: evidence based on compatible element geochemistry and principal component analysis. J Archaeol Sci 42:179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briant, M (2017) The Giant’s causeway: culturally natural or naturally cultural? In: Larwood J, France S, Mahon C (Eds) (2017). Culturally natural or naturally cultural? Exploring the relationship between nature and culture through world heritage, 24–25. IUCN National Committee UK

  • Brilha J, Gray M, Pereira DI, Pereira P (2018) Geodiversity: an integrative review as a contribution to the sustainable management of the whole of nature. Environ Sci Pol 86:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crofts R, Gordon JE (2015) Geoconservation in protected areas. In: Worboys GL, Lockwood M, Kothari A, Feary S, Pulsford I (eds) Protected Area Governance and Management. ANU Press, Canberra, pp 531–568

    Google Scholar 

  • English Nature, Quarry Products Association, Silica and Moulding Sands Association (2003) Geodiversity and the minerals industry—conserving our geological heritage. Entec UK Ltd

  • Gordon (2012) Rediscovering a sense of wonder: Geoheritage, Geotourism and cultural landscape experiences. Geoheritage 4:65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon JE, Barron HF, Hansom JD, Thomas MF (2012) Engaging with geodiversity – why it matters. Proc Geol Assoc 123:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray JM (2013) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature, 2nd edn. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray JM, Gordon JE, Brown EJ (2013) Geodiversity and the ecosystem approach: the contribution of geoscience in delivering integrated environmental management. Proc Geol Assoc 124:659–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrald J (2018) Northamptonshire celebrates having a real ‘Jurassic Park. Earth Heritage 49:39–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Larwood J (2017) Geodiversity – a cultural template. In: Larwood J, France S, Mahon C (eds) (2017). Culturally natural or naturally cultural? Exploring the relationship between nature and culture through World Heritage. IUCN National Committee, UK, pp 16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • López-García JA, Oyarzun R, López Andrés S, Manteca Martínez JI (2011) Scientific, educational and environmental considerations regarding mine sites and geoheritage: a perspective from SE Spain. Geoheritage 3:267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata-Perelló J, Carrión P, Molina J, Villas-Boas R (2018) Geomining heritage as a tool to promote the social development of rural communities. In: Reynard E and Brilha J (Eds) (2018) geoheritage assessment, protection, and management. Elsevier pp 167–178

  • Miles E (2013) Involving local communities and volunteers in geoconservation across Herefordshire and Worcestershire, UK – the Community Earth Heritage Champions Project. Proc Geol Assoc 124:691–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore RN, Gallagher LT, Gelder JT, Moore IR, Brooks R, Farrant AR (2017) Stonehenge - a unique late cretaceous phosphatic chalk geology: implications for sea-level, climate and tectonics and impact on engineering and archaeology. Proc Geol Assoc 128:564–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes MA (Ed) (2004) Natural and cultural landscapes – the geological foundation. Proceedings of a conference 9–11 September 2002, Dublin Castle, Ireland, 329. Royal Irish Academy, Dublin

  • Parkes M, Gatley S (2018) Quarrying and Geoconservation in the Republic of Ireland – the effectiveness of guidelines for operators. Geoheritage 10:169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser CD (2003) Geology and quarries: some new opportunities. Geol Today 19:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser CD (2018) Geoconservation, quarrying and mining: opportunities and challenges illustrated through working in partnership with the mineral extraction industry in England. Geoheritage 10:259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser CD, Murphy M, Larwood J (2006) Geological conservation: a guide to good practice. English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser CD, Díaz-Martínez E, Larwood JG (2018) The conservation of geosites: principles and practice. In: Reynard E and Brilha J (Eds) (2018) Geoheritage assessment, protection, and management. Elsevier, pp 193–212

  • Reynard E, Giusti C (2018) The landscape and the cultural value of Geoheritage In: Reynard E and Brilha J (Eds) (2018) Geoheritage Assessment, Protection, and Management. Elsevier, pp 147–166

  • Stefano M, Paolo S (2017) Abandoned quarries and geotourism: an opportunity for the Salento Quarry District (Apulia, Southern Italy). Geoheritage 9:463–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson A, Poole J, Carroll L, Foweraker M, Harris K, Cox P (2006) Geodiversity action plans for aggregate companies: a guide to good practice. Report to the mineral industry research organisation. Capita Symonds Ltd, East Grinstead

  • Worton GJ, Gillard R (2013) Local communities and young people – the future of geoconservation. Proc Geol Assoc 124:681–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz J, Waters C, Williams M, Aldridge DC, Wilkinson IP (2018) The stratigraphical signature of the Anthropocene in England and its wider context. Proc Geol Assoc 129:482–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Ewa Glowniak and the other organisers of the IX International ProGEO Symposium, Chęciny, Poland, 2018, for inspiring production of this paper, and I am grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. Graham Worton kindly provided Figs. 7 and 8, whilst Dave Evans drafted Figs. 1 and 2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin D. Prosser.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Geoheritage and Conservation: Modern Approaches and Applications Towards the 2030 Agenda, IX ProGEO Symposium, Poland, 25-28th June, 2018

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prosser, C.D. Communities, Quarries and Geoheritage—Making the Connections. Geoheritage 11, 1277–1289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00355-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00355-4

Keywords

Navigation