Abstract
Geodiversity and geomorphosites in a natural protected area in Spain are evaluated. The estimation of geodiversity has been calculated by habitat and by geomorphological unit based on the calculation method developed by Serrano and Ruiz-Flaño, and geomorphosites have been assessed for the same area. Finally, results from the calculation of geodiversity and geomorphosites are compared. The aim is to introduce a series of tools that the manager can apply to integrate abiotic aspects in the evaluation and protection of areas with outstanding natural diversity and considerable natural heritage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexandrowicz Z, Kozlowski K (1999) From selected geosites to geodiversity conservation. Polish example of modern framework. In: Barettino D, Vallejo M, Gallego E (eds) Towards the balanced management and conservation of the geological heritage in the new milenium. Sociedad Geológica de España, Madrid, pp 52–54
Bartolomé C, Álvarez J, Vaquero J, Costa M, Casermeiro MA, Giraldo J, Zamora J (2005) Los tipos de habitats de interés comunitario de España. Guía Básica. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Natura 2000, Madrid
Benito-Calvo A, Pérez-González A, Magri O, Meza P (2009) Assessing regional geodiversity: the Iberian Peninsula. Eart Surf Process Landf 34(10):1433–1445
Bruschi VM, Cendrero A (2005) Geosite evaluation: can we measure intangible values? In: Piacente S, Coratza P (eds) Geomorphological sites and geodiversity. Il Quat 18 (1):293–306
Bunce RG, Metzger MJ, Jongman RHG, Brandt J, de Blust G, Elena-Rossello R, Groom GB, Halada L, Hofer G, Howard DC, Kovář P, Mücher CA, Padoa-Schioppa E, Paelinx D, Palo A, Perez-Soba M, Ramos IL, Roche P, Skånes H, Wrbka T (2008) A standardized procedure for surveillance and monitoring European habitats and provision of spatial data. Landsc Ecol 23(1):11–25
Carton A, Cavallin A, Francavilla F, Mantovani F, Panizza M, Pellegrini GB, Tellini C (1994) Ricerche ambientali per l’individuazione dei beni geomorfologici. Metodi ed esempli. Il Quat 7:365–372
Coratza P, Giusti C (2005) Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. In: Piacente S, Coratza P (ed) Geomorphological sites and geodiversity. Il Quat 18(1):307–313
Dansereau P (1957) Biogeography: an ecological perspective. Ronald, New York
Delibes G, Rojo M, Represa JI (1993) Los dólmenes de La Lora: guía arqueológica. Junta de Castilla y León, Valladolid
Eberhard R (1997) Pattern and process: towards a regional approach to national state assessment of geodiversity. Technical series 2. Australian Heritage Commission and Environment Forest Taskforce, Environment Australia, Canberra
ECE. European Comission DG Environments (2003) Interpretation Manual of European Union habitats. EUR 25. European Comission, Bruxelles
Erikstad L (2000) The linchip safeguarding Norwegian geological interest. Eart Herit 13:12
García-Fernández J (1992) El espacio geográfico de los páramos de La Lora. In: García-Fernández J and Rubio Recio JM (ed) II Jornadas de Geografía Física de Sedano. Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, pp 9–54
González-Amuchastegui MJ, Serrano E (2007) Evolución geomorfológica, cambios ambientales e intervención humana durante el Holoceno en la cuenca alta del Ebro: las tobas de los valles del Purón y Molinar. Estud Geogr 73(263):527–546
González-Pellejero R (1986) Dinámica de un espacio natural. Los cañones calcáreos del Ebro (Burgos). Ería 10:5–86
Gordon JE (2004) Geological conservation. In: Selley RC, Coks LRM, Plimer IR (eds) Encyclopedia of geology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 29–35
Gray M (2004) Geodiversity. Valuing and conserving abiotic nature. Wiley, Chichester
Hjort J, Louto M (2010) Geodiversity of high latitude landscapes in northern Finland. Geomorphol 115:109–116
IUPAC (1997) Compendium of chemical terminology, (the “Gold Book”), 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford. doi:10.1351/goldbook
Kozlowski S (2004) Geodiversity. The concept and scope of Geodiversity. Pol Geol Rev Przeglad Geol 52(8–2):833–839
Nieto LM (2001) Geodiversidad: propuesta de una definición integradora. Bol Geol Min 112(2):3–12
Panizza M (1990) Beni geomorfologici nel bacino del fiume Panaro. In: Serafín F and Manicardi A (ed) Il sistema fluviale Scoltenna/Panaro: storie d’acque e di uomi-ni. Amministrazine Comunale di Nonantola, Nonantola, pp 49–54
Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of geomophological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46:4–6
Panizza M (2009) The geomorphodiversity of Dolomites (Italy): a key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage 1:33–42
Panizza M, Piacente S (2009) Cultural geomorphology and geodiversity. In: Reynard E et al (eds) Geomorphosites. Verlag Pfeil, Munich, pp 35–48
Pemberton M (2001) Conserving geodiveristy, the importance of valuing our geological heritage. Geological Society of Autralian National Conference. http://www.dpiw.tas.gov.au/inter.nsf/. Accessed 15 January 2010
Radford AE, Otte DKS, Otte LJ, Massey JR, Whitson PD (1981) Natural Heritage: classification, inventory and information. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
Reynard E (2004) Géotopes, geo(morpho)sites et paysages geomorphologiues. In: Reynard E, Pralong JP (ed) Paysages geomorphologiques. Travaux et Recherches, 27. Institut de Geógraphie de la Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, pp 134–137
Reynard E (2005) Geomorphosites et paysages. Geomorphologie 3:181–188
Reynard E (2009) Geomorphosites: definition and characteristics. In: Reynard E et al (eds) Geomorphosites. Verlag Pfeil, Munich, pp 51–63
Reynard E, Coratza P (2007) Geomorphosites and geodiversity: a new domain of research. Geogr Helv 62(3):138–139
Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing “scientific” and “additional values” of geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62(3):148–158
Rivas V, Rix K, Francés E, Cendrero A, Brundsen D (1997) Geomorphological indicators for environmental impact assessment: consumable and non-consumable geomorphological resources. Geomorphol 18:169–182
Saldaña A, Ibáñez JJ (2004) Pedodiversity analysis at large scales: an example of three fluvial terraces of the Henares River (central Spain). Geomorphol 62:123–138
Serrano E, González-Trueba JJ (2005) Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Geomorphologie 3:197–208
Serrano E, Ruiz-Flaño P (2007a) Geodiversity. A theoretical and applied concept. Geogr Helv 62(3):140–147
Serrano E, Ruiz-Flaño P (2007b) Geodiversidad: concepto, evaluación y aplicación territorial. El caso de Tiermes Caracena (Soria). Bol AGE 45:79–98
Serrano E, Ruiz-Flaño P (2009) Geomorphosites and Geodiversity. In: Reynard E et al (eds) Geomorphosites. Verlag Pfeil, Munich, pp 51–63
Serrano E, Ruiz-Flaño P, Arroyo P (2009a) Geodiversity assessment in a rural landscape: Tiermes-Caracena area (Soria, Spain). Mem Descr Carta Geol Ital 86:171–178
Serrano E, González-Amuchastegui MJ, Ruiz-Flaño P, González-Trueba JJ (2009b) Gestión ambiental y Geomorfología: valoración de los lugares de interés geomorfológico del parque natural de Las Hoces del Alto Ebro y Rudrón. Cuatern y Geomorfol 23(3–4):65–82
Sharples C (1995) Geoconservation in forest management: principles and procedures. Taskforests 7:37–50
Stanley M (2001) Geodiversity strategy. Progeo News 1:6–9
Zwolinski Z (2004) Geodiversity. In: Goudie AS (ed) Encyclopedia of geomorphology 1. Routledge, London, pp 417–418
Acknowledgments
This study was conducted within the framework of the UNESCO09/05 project. It was also financed by the Program for University Teacher Training (FPU) of the Ministry for Education. The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and reflections, which have greatly improved the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pellitero, R., González-Amuchastegui, M.J., Ruiz-Flaño, P. et al. Geodiversity and Geomorphosite Assessment Applied to a Natural Protected Area: the Ebro and Rudron Gorges Natural Park (Spain). Geoheritage 3, 163–174 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0022-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0022-9