Skip to main content
Log in

The Inhibitory Effects of Aconitic Acid on Bioethanol Production

  • Research article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fermentation of the sweet sorghum sugars, glucose, fructose, and sucrose to ethanol was studied in the presence of aconitic acid. In the past, aconitic acid has been identified as potential fermentation inhibitor, but very limited information exists about its inhibitory effects. As aconitic acid is naturally present in sweet sorghum (and its juice) and the fact that this plant has been proposed as a bioenergy crop, it was necessary to quantify the inhibition. Distiller’s yeast was used to produce ethanol from 83 g/L of total sugars in the presence of 0 to 13 g/L of aconitic acid. In some experiments, the pH of the fermentation was initially adjusted and allowed to drop as the fermentation progressed. In other experiments, the level of aconitic acid was held constant, while the pH was controlled at different set points between 2 and 4.5. In a final set of experiments, the pH was controlled to 2.9 and the initial concentration of aconitic acid was varied. It was conclusively shown that aconitic acid negatively impacts fermentation rate of distiller’s yeast and that the impact was pH dependent. At below pH 3.5, the impact was clearly observed and it became more influential at lower pH. The impact of aconitic acid on the fermentation rate was linked to the presence of undissociated aconitic acid which occurs at below pH 4.5. The level of undissociated aconitic acid that can be tolerated by the yeast depends on the pH. Thus, the most reasonable approach to improve fermentation rates in the presence of aconitic acid is to increase the pH of the fermentation. Both the ethanol yield (on sugar) and the final ethanol concentration (titer) were higher in the presence of aconitic acid but at a very small level (i.e., 4 and 3%, respectively). Thus, if the pH of the fermentation is increased, the presence of aconitic acid can be seen as advantageous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amorim, H.V. 2015. Challenges to produce ethanol from sweet sorghum in Brazil. Paper presented at the Sweet Sorghum Association 2015 Annual Conference, Orlando, FL, January 27–29.

  • Atkinson, B., and F. Mavituna. 1991. Biochemical engineering and biotechnology handbook, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Stockton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M.A., and M.A. Brannan. 1983. Rapid analyses of lactic acid, an indicator of sugar cane deterioration, and aconitic acid, an indicator of sugar cane maturity, by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 2: 88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D.W. 1953. Concentration of aqueous aconitic acid solutions. U.S. Patent 2,650,248.

  • Day, D.F., and D. Sarkar. 1982. Fuel alcohol from sweet sorghum: microbial aspects. Developments in Industrial Microbiology 23: 361–366.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J.A. 1999. Lange’s handbook of chemistry. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, G., M. Cole, and B. Andrzejewski. 2013. New commercially viable processing technologies for the production of sugar feedstocks from sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) for manufacture of biofuels and bioproducts. Sugar Tech 15 (3): 232–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, W.R., and C.A. Westby. 1989. Cofermentation of sweet sorghum juice and grain for production of fuel ethanol and distillers’ wet grain. Biomass 18 (1): 43–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, T., N.V. Narendranath, K. Dawson, and R. Power. 2006. Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 33 (6): 469–474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, L.J., and C. Martín. 2016. Pretreatment of lignocellulose: Formation of inhibitory by-products and strategies for minimizing their effects. Bioresource Technology 199: 103–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanitkar, A., G. Aita, and L. Madsen. 2013. The recovery of polymerization grade aconitic acid from sugarcane molasses. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 88 (12): 2188–2192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., and D.F. Day. 2011. Composition of sugar cane, energy cane, and sweet sorghum suitable for ethanol production at Louisiana sugar mills. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 38 (7): 803–807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., K.J. Han, Y. Jeong, and D.F. Day. 2012. Utilization of whole sweet sorghum containing juice, leaves, and bagasse for bio-ethanol production. Food Science and Biotechnology 21 (4): 1075–1080.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King, W.D., and D.R. Kester. 1990. A general approach for calculating polyprotic acid speciation and buffer capacity. Journal of Chemical Education 67 (11): 932–933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klasson, K.T. 2016. Impact of potential fermentation inhibitors present in sweet sorghum sugar solutions. Sugar Tech 1–7.

  • Maiorella, B., H.W. Blanch, and C.R. Wilke. 1983. By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 25 (1): 103–121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mook, W.G. 2001. Environmental isotopes in the hydrological cycle: Principes and applications, Volume 1: Theory, methods, review. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussatto, S.I., and I.C. Roberto. 2004. Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for use in fermentative processes: A review. Bioresource Technology 93 (1): 1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Narendranath, N.V., K.C. Thomas, and W.M. Ingledew. 2001. Effects of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a minimal medium. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 26 (3): 171–177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E.K. 1929. Some organic acids of sugar cane molasses. Journal of the American Chemical Society 51 (9): 2808–2810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmqvist, E., H. Grage, N.Q. Meinander, and B. Hahn-Hägerdal. 1999. Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 63 (1): 46–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfendt, L., B. Drazic, G. Popovic, B. Drakulic, Z. Vitnik, and I. Juranic. 2003. Determination of all pKa values of some di- and tri-carboxylic unsaturated and epoxy acids and their polylinear correlation with the carboxylic group atomic charges. Journal of Chemical Research (M) 2003 (5): 0501–0514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, P., C.O. Calderon, K. Hatzixanthis, and M. Mollapour. 2001. Weak acid adaptation: The stress response that confers yeasts with resistance to organic acid food preservatives. Microbiology 147 (10): 2635–2642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polack, J.A., and D.F. Day. 1982. Ethanol for sweet sorghum. Journal American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 1: 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P.S., K.S. Vinutha, G.S.A. Kumar, T. Chiranjeevi, A. Uma, P. Lal, R.S. Prakasham et al. 2016. Sorghum: A multipurpose bioenergy crop. In Sorghum: State of the art and future perspectives, eds. I. Ciampitti, and V. Prasad. Agronomy Monographs, vol. 58. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America, Inc.

  • Russell, J.B. 1992. Another explanation for the toxicity of fermentation acids at low pH: Anion accumulation versus uncoupling. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 73 (5): 363–370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savard, T., C. Beaulieu, N.J. Gardner, and C.P. Champagne. 2002. Characterization of spoilage yeasts isolated from fermented vegetables and inhibition by lactic, acetic and propionic acids. Food Microbiology 19 (4): 363–373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serna-Saldivar, S.O., and W.L. Rooney. 2014. Production and supply logistics of sweet sorghum as an energy feedstock. In Sustainable bioenergy production, ed. L. Wang, 193–212. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taherzadeh, M.J., C. Niklasson, and G. Lidén. 1997. Acetic acid—friend or foe in anaerobic batch conversion of glucose to ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Chemical Engineering Science 52 (15): 2653–2659.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K.C., S.H. Hynes, and W.M. Ingledew. 2002. Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68 (4): 1616–1623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ventre, E.K. 1955. Method for extracting aconitic acid from sugarcane and sorgo juices, sirups, and molasses. U.S. Patent 2,712,552.

  • Verduyn, C., E. Postma, W.A. Scheffers, and J.P. Van Dijken. 1990. Energetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. Journal of General Microbiology 136 (3): 405–412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., S. Staggenborg, J.L. Propheter, W.L. Rooney, J. Yu, and D. Wang. 2010. Features of sweet sorghum juice and their performance in ethanol fermentation. Industrial Crops and Products 31 (1): 164–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Mr. Larry Boihem, Jr., for assistance with chemical analysis. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Thomas Klasson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klasson, K.T. The Inhibitory Effects of Aconitic Acid on Bioethanol Production. Sugar Tech 20, 88–94 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0525-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0525-7

Keywords

Navigation