Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Gibberellic Acid on Germination Behaviour of Sugar Beet Cultivars under Salt Stress Conditions of Egypt

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response of six sugar beet genotypes (Raspoly, Nada, Strube, Almaz, Toro, Oskarpoly) under seven salinity levels (distilled water as control, 1500, 3000, 45000, 6000, 7500 and 9000 ppm NaCl) and soaking in gibberellic acid levels were studied on germination parameters. An experiment with factorial arrangement was conducted by using randomize complete block design with four replications. Seed soaking in GA3 significantly affected final germination percentage (FGP), mean germination time (MGT), coefficient velocity (CV), seedling vigor index (SVI), energy of germination (EG), emergence rate (ER) and speed of germination (SG). Highest averages of FGP, CV, SVI, EG, ER and SG, were produced from soaking seed in 200 ppm of GA3. Moreover, highest averages of MGT were recorded from soaking sugar beet seed in the control treatment. Sugar beet cultivars significantly differed in FGP, MGT, CV, SVI, EG, ER and SG. Highest averages of FGP, MGT, CV, SVI, EG, ER and SG were recorded with sown Raspoly cultivar. Increasing salinity concentrations from 0 to 9,000 ppm significantly decreased FGP, CV, SVI, EG, ER and SG. While, MGT increased with increasing salinity concentrations. Results of means comparison showed that in all genotypes, there was a decrease in germination percentage due to salinity stress increment and maximum germination percentage was delayed. The interaction between cultivars and seed soaking in GA3 levels significantly affected FGP, MGT, CV and SVI. The interaction between seed soaking in GA3 levels and salinity concentrations significantly affected FGP, MGT and SVI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul-Baki, A.A., and J.D. Anderson. 1970. Viability and leaching of sugars from germinating barley. Crop Science 10: 31–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akman, Z. 2009. Effects of GA3 and kinetin pre-sowing treatments on seedling emergence and seedling growth in wheat under saline conditions. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8: 362–367.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Almansouri, M., J.M. Kinet, and S. Lutts. 2001. Effect of salt and osmotic stresses on germination in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Plant and Soil 231: 243–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asahina, M., H. Lwai, A. Kikuchi, S. Yamaguchi, Y. Kamiya, H. Kamada, and S. Saton. 2002. Gibberellins produced in the cotyledon in required for cell division during tissue reunion in the cortex of cut cucumber and Tomato Hypocotyls. Plant Physiology 129: 102–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atia, A., A. Debez, Z. Barhoumi, A. Smaoui, and C. Abdelly. 2009. ABA, GA3 and nitrate may control seed germination of Crithmum maritimum (Apiaceae) under saline conditions. Comptes Rendus Biologies 332: 704–710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banyal, S., and V.K. Rai. 1983. Reversal of osmotic stress effects by gibberellic acid in Brassica campestris. Recovery of hypocotyls growth, protein and RNA levels in presence of GA. Physiologia Plantarum 59: 111–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjee, S. 2008. Triadimefon pretreatment protects newly assembled membrane system and causes upregulation of stress proteins in salinity stressed Amaranthus lividus L. during early germination. Journal of Environmental Biology 29: 805–810.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnert, H.J., D.E. Nelson, and R.G. Jensen. 1995. Adaptations to environmental stresses. The Plant Cell 7: 1099–1111.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dadkhah, A.R. 2010. Effect of long term salt stress on gas exchange and leaf carbohydrate contents in two sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars. Biological Sciences 5(8): 512–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.A., and E.H. Roberts. 1981. The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Science and Technology 9: 373–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoulam, C., and K. Fares. 2001. Effect of salinity on seed germination and early seedling growth of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Seed Science and Technology 29: 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoulam, C., A. Foursy, and K. Fares. 2002. Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivars. Environmental and Experimental-Botany 47:39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, A.K., and A.A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib, M. 2010. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seed pre-treatment with water and HCl to improve germination. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(9): 1338–1342.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hajiboland, R., A. Joudmand, and K. Fotouhi. 2009. Mild salinity improves sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) quality. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B, Soil and Plant Science 59: 295–305.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarzadeh, A.A., and N. Aliasghrazad. 2007. Salinity and salt composition effects on seed germination and root length of four sugar beet cultivars. Biologia 65(5): 562–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, A., and E.S. Rha. 2007. Gibberellic acid (GA3) enhance seed water uptake, germination and early seedling growth in sugar beet under salt stress. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10(4): 654–658.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, M., D. Bae Lee, K. Yong Jung, M. Ashraf, S.C. Lee, and Y. Shik Rha. 2006. Effect of salt (NaCl) stress on germination and early seedling growth of four vegetables species. Journal of Central European Agriculture 2: 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafi, M., and M. And Gholdani. 2001. The effects of water potential and its creator on the germination of three crops of wheat, sugar beet, and chickpea. Agricultural Science and Industries 15: 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, S., A.K. Gupta, and N. Kaur. 1998. Gibberellic acid and kinetin partially reverse the effect of water stress on germination and seedling growth. Plant Growth Regulation 25: 29–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khajeh-Hosseini, M., A.A. Powell, and I.J. Bingham. 2003. The interaction between salinity stress and seed vigour during germination of soybean seeds. Seed Science and Technology 31: 715–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khavari-Nejad, R.A., F. Nahafi, and S. Khavari-Nejad. 2008. Growth and some physiological parameters of four sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars as affected by salinity. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 11(10): 1390–1393.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lgbal, H.F., M.N. Khalid, A. Tahir, A.N. Ahmed, and E. Rasul. 2001. Gibberellin alleviation of NaCl salinity in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 4(3): 378–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maghsoudi Moud, A., and K. Maghsoudi. 2008. Salt stress effects on respiration and growth of germinated seeds of different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4(3): 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, J.D. 1962. Speed of germination and in selection evaluating for seedling emergence and vigour. Crop Science 2: 176–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J.M., A. Elawady, D. El-Khishin, R.P. Naegele, K.M. Carr, and B. delos Reyes. 2008. Sugar beet germination: Phenotypic selection and molecular profiling to identify genes involved in abiotic stress response. IVth IS on seed, transplant and stand establishment of hort. Crops 782: 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mer, R., K. Prajih, D.H. Pandya, and A.N. Pandey. 2000. Effect of salt on germination of seeds and growth of young plants of Hordeum vulgare, Triticum aestivum, Cicer arietinum and Brassica Juncea. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 185: 209–217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafavi, K. 2012. Effect of salt stress on germination and early seedling growth stage of sugar beet cultivars. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 6(2): 120–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munns, R., R.A. James, and A. Lauchli. 2006. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 1025–1043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nasri, N., H. Mahmoudi, O. Baatour, S. M’rah, R. Kaddour, and M. Lachâal. 2012. Effect of exogenous gibberellic acid on germination, seedling growth and phosphatase activities in Lettuce under salt stress. African Journal of Biotechnology 11(56): 11967–11971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, P.M. 1995. Inhibition of root growth by salinity stress: Toxicity or an adaptive biophysical response. In Structure and Function of Roots, ed. F. Baluska, M. Ciamporova, O. Gasparikova, and P.W. Barlow, 299–304. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pakniyat, H., and M. Armion. 2007. Sodium and praline accumulation as osmo regulators in tolerance of sugar beet genotypes to salinity. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10(22): 4081–4086.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parida, A.K., and A.B. Das. 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 60: 324–349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanagule, W., and M. Thitisaksakul. 2008. Effect of salinity stress on growth and carbohydrate metabolism in three rice (oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity tolerance. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 46: 736–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D.L.N., K.E. Giller, A.R. Yeo, and T.J. Flowers. 2002. The effects of salinity and sodicity upon nodulation and nitrogen fixation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Annals of Botany 89(5): 563–570.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruan, S., Q. Xue, and K. Tylkowska. 2002. The influence of priming on germination of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds and seedling emergence and performance in flooded soils. Seed Science and Technology 30: 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel, D.F. 1986. MSTAT-C computer based data analysis software Crop and Soil Science Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.

  • Saadat, S., P. Badakhshan, A. Sattarzadeh, and S.T. Soula. 2012. Effect of salinity on germination and seedling growth of 4 sugar beet genotypes (Beta vulgaris L.). Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2(5): 615–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S.J., R.A. Jones, and W.A. Williams. 1984. Review of data analysis methods for seed germination. Crop Science 24: 1192–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu, P., J.S. Sital, M.S. Bhatia, R.S. Narang, and A.S. Narang. 1993. Effect of some newly formulated organic compounds on the yield, mineral composition and sugar quality of Beta vulgaris L. Indian Sugar 42(12): 931–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G.W., and W.G. Cochran. 1980. Statistical Methods, 7th ed. Ames: The Iowa State Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltani, A., S. Galeshi, E. Zenali, and N. Latifi. 2001. Germination seed reserve utilization and growth of chickpea as affected by salinity and seed size. Seed Science and Technology 30: 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. A. E. Abido.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kandil, A.A., Sharief, A.E., Abido, W.A.E. et al. Effect of Gibberellic Acid on Germination Behaviour of Sugar Beet Cultivars under Salt Stress Conditions of Egypt. Sugar Tech 16, 211–221 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-013-0252-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-013-0252-7

Keywords

Navigation