Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A step forward on order-α robust nonparametric method: inclusion of weight restrictions, convexity and non-variable returns to scale

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Partial frontiers have been recently developed in order to overcome several drawbacks of the traditional nonparametric techniques. These robust frontier (order-\(\alpha\) and order-m) methods avoid the curse of dimensionality, are less sensitive to outliers and extreme data and may include direct environmental information in the model. Nonetheless, the disadvantages of these partial frontier-based methods according to the formulation proposed in the literature are that they do not allow weight restrictions or non-variable returns to scale technology. The procedure here proposed is an extension of the traditional order-\(\alpha\) method, allowing the estimation of an empirical convex \(\alpha\)-level, assuming also some additional constraints, such as the virtual weight restrictions and non-variable returns to scale. In the particular case of nonconvex attainable sets, unrestricted formulations and variable returns to scale assumption, the proposed procedure returns the same results as the standard order-\(\alpha\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. \({\hat{\theta }}\) denotes the estimate (empirical) of the true but unknown efficiency score, \(\theta\).

  2. Note that they are both deterministic models.

  3. Source: http://benchmarking.acss.min-saude.pt/benchmarking.aspx.

References

  • Abid I, Goaied M (2017) A meta-frontier assessment of bank efficiency in Middle East and North Africa countries. Int J Prod Perform Manag 66(2):266–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrell PJ, Tind J (2001) A dual approach to nonconvex frontier models. J Prod Anal 16(2):129–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen R, Athanassopoulos A, Dyson RG, Thanassoulis E (1997) Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: evolution, development and future directions. Ann Oper Res 13:13–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragon Y, Daouia A, Thomas-Agnan C (2005) Nonparametric frontier estimation: a conditional quantile based approach. Econ Theory 21:358–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bǎdin L, Daraio C, Simar L (2010) Optimal bandwidth selection for conditional efficiency measures: a data-driven approach. Eur J Oper Res 201(2):633–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bǎdin L, Daraio C, Simar L (2012) How to measure the impact of environmental factors in a nonparametric production model. Eur J Oper Res 223(3):818–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30(9):1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho P, Marques RC (2015) Computing economies of vertical integration, economies of scope and economies of scale using partial frontier non-parametric methods. Eur J Oper Res 234:292–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazals C, Florens JP, Simar L (2002) Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach. J Econ 106(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaroni G (2011) A complete FDH efficiency analysis of a diffused production network: the case of the Italian driver and vehicle agency. Int Trans Oper Res 18(2):205–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1979) Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res 3(4):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Huang ZM, Sun DB (1990) Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. J Econ 46(1):73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and dea-solver software. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordero JM, Prior D, Simancas R (2016) A comparison of public and private schools in Spain using robust nonparametric frontier methods. Cent Eur J Oper Res 24(3):659–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daidone S, D’Amico F (2009) Technical efficiency, specialization and ownership form: evidences from a pooling of italian hospitals. J Prod Anal 32:203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daouia A, Gijbels I (2011) Robustness and inference in nonparametric partial frontier modelling. J Econ 161(2):147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daouia A, Simar L (2005) Robust nonparametric estimators of monotone boundaries. J Multivar Anal 96(2):311–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daouia A, Simar L (2007) Nonparametric efficiency analysis: a multivariate conditional quantile approach. J Econ 140(2):375–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daraio C, Simar L (2005) Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: a probabilistic approach. J Prod Anal 24(1):93–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daraio C, Simar L (2007a) Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Daraio C, Simar L (2007b) Conditional nonparametric frontier models for convex and nonconvex technologies: a unifying approach. J Prod Anal 28(1–2):13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Witte K, Marques RC (2009) Capturing the environment, a metafrontier approach to the drinking water sector. Int Trans Oper Res 16:257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Witte K, Marques R (2010) Designing performance incentives, an international benchmark study in the water sector. Cent Eur J Oper Res 18(2):189–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Witte K, Marques RC (2011) Big and beautiful? on non-parametrically measuring scale economies in non-convex technologies. J Prod Anal 35(3):213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19(3):273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deprins D, Simar L, Tulkens H (1984) Measuring labor efficiency in post offices. In: Marchand M, Pestieau P, Tulkens H (eds) The performance of public enterprises: concepts and measurements. Elsevier, Amesterdam, pp 247–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimas G, Goula A, Soulis S (2012) Productive performance and its components in Greek public hospitals. Oper Res 12(1):15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian A (2005) Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q 83(4):691–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS, Shale EA (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132(2):245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad A, Parker BR, Tavares G (2008) Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: a survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio Econ Plan Sci 42(3):151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A 120:253–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira DC, Marques RC (2015) Did the corporatization of Portuguese hospitals significantly change their productivity? Eur J Health Econ 16(3):289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira DC, Marques RC (2016a) Identifying congestion levels, sources and determinants on intensive care units: the Portuguese case. Health Care Manag Sci 1:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira DC, Marques RC (2016b) Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indexes for clusters performance evaluation. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 15(5):1015–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira DC, Marques RC (2016c) Should inpatients be adjusted by their complexity and severity for efficiency assessment? evidence from Portugal. Health Care Manag Sci 19(1):43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira DC, Marques RC, Pedro MI (2016) Comparing efficiency of holding business model and individual management model of airports. J Air Transp Manag 57:168–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira DC, Marques RC, Nunes AM (2017) Economies of scope in the health sector: the case of Portuguese hospitals. Eur J Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fieger P, Villano RA, Rice J, Cooksey R (2017) Two dimensional efficiency measurements in vocational education: evidence from Australia. Int J Prod Perform Manag 66(2):196–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florens JP, Simar L (2005) Parametric approximations of nonparametric frontier. J Econ 124:91–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitto S, Mancuso P (2012) Bootstrapping the malmquist indexes for Italian airports. Int J Prod Econ 135(1):403–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gok MS, Sezen B (2013) Analyzing the ambiguous relationship between efficiency, quality and patient satisfaction in healthcare services: the case of public hospitals in Turkey. Health Policy 111(3):290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, Simar L (2002) Estimating a changepoint, boundary, or frontier in the presence of observation error. J Am Stat Assoc 97(458):523–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth B (2008) The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. Health Econ 45:1107–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain V, Kumar A, Kumar S, Chandra C (2015) Weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive genetic algorithm based approach for incorporating value judgments. Expert Syst Appl 42(3):1503–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong SO, Simar L (2006) Linearly interpolated FDH efficiency score for nonconvex frontiers. J Multivar Anal 97(10):2141–2161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis R, Velentzas K (2012) Productivity and quality changes in Greek public hospitals. Oper Res 12(1):15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Khushalani J, Ozcan YA (2017) Are hospitals producing quality care efficiently? an analysis using dynamic network data envelopment analysis (DEA). Socio Econ Plan Sci 60:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirigia JM, Emrouznejad A, Gama Vaz R, Bastiene H, Padayachy J (2007) A comparative assessment of performance and productivity of health centres in Seychelles. Int J Prod Perform Manag 57(1):72–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans TC (1951) An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TC (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Wiley, New York, pp 33–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavado RF, Cabanda EC (2009) The efficiency of health and education expenditures in the Philippines. Cent Eur J Oper Res 17(3):275–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leleu H (2006) A linear programming framework for free disposal hull technologies and cost functions: primal and dual models. Eur J Oper Res 168(2):340–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindlbauer I, Schreyögg J (2014) The relationship between hospital specialization and hospital efficiency: do different measures of specialization lead to different results? Health Care Manag Sci 17:365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JS, Lu LYY, Lu WM, Lin BJY (2013) A survey of DEA applications. Omega Int J Manag Sci 41(5):893–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell CAK (1993) Production frontiers and productive efficiency. In: Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency: techniques and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques RC, Carvalho P (2013) Estimating the efficiency of Portuguese hospitals using an appropriate production technology. Int Trans Oper Res 20(2):233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan YA (2014) Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation: an assessment using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Park BU, Simar L, Weiner C (1999) The FDH estimator for productivity efficiency scores: asymptotic properties. Econ Theory 16:855–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedraja-Chaparro F, Salinas-Jimenez J, Smith P (1997) On the role of weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J Prod Anal 8(2):215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink GH, Murray MA, McKillop I (2003) Hospital efficiency and patient satisfaction. Health Serv Manag Res 16(1):24–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podinovski VV, Athanassopoulos AD (1998) Assessing the relative efficiency of decision making units using DEA models with weight restrictions. J Oper Res Soc 49(5):500–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podinovski VV, Bouzdine-Chameeva T (2015) Consistent weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 244(1):916–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela MCAS, Thanassoulis E, Simpson G (2004) Negative data in DEA: a directional distance approach applied to bank branches. J Oper Res Soc 55(10):1111–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) An investigation of returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. Omega Int J Manag Sci 27(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard RW (1953) Cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard RW (1974) Indirect production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimshak DG, Lenard ML, Klimberg RK (2009) Incorporating quality into data envelopment analysis of nursing home performance: a case study. Omega Int J Manag Sci 37(3):672–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (1998) Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Manag Sci 44(11):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (2000a) A general methodology for bootstrapping in nonparametric frontier models. J Appl Stat 44:779–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (2000b) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art. J Prod Anal 13(1):49–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (2001) Testing restrictions in nonparametric efficiency models. Commun Stat Simul Comput 30(1):159–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (2002) Non-parametric tests of returns to scale. Eur J Oper Res 139(1):115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (2008) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: Recent developments and perspectives. In: Fried H, Lovell CAK, Schmidt S et al (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 91–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Simões P, Marques RC (2011) Performance and congestion analysis of the Portuguese hospital services. Cent Eur J Oper Res 19(1):39–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simões P, Marques RC (2012) On the economic performance of the waste sector. A literature review. J Environ Manag 106(15):40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RG, Langemeier LN, Lee CT, Lee E, Thrall RM (1990) The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. J Econ 46(1–2):93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdmanis VG, Rosko MD, Mutter RL (2008) Hospital quality, efficiency, and input slack differentials. Health Serv Res 43(5):1830–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahran SZ, Alam JB, Al-Zahrani AH, Smirlis Y, Papadimitriou S, Tsioumas V (2017) Analysis of port efficiency using imprecise and incomplete data. Oper Res 1:1–28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the beneficial and insightful comments of two anonymous referees who kindly and significantly have improved the paper’s quality, clarity, and structure. Any errors are the authors’ own responsibility. This work was financially supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT): SFRH/BD/113038/2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CESUR, CERis - Civil Engineering Research and Innovation for Sustainability, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

    Diogo Cunha Ferreira & Rui Cunha Marques

Authors
  1. Diogo Cunha Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui Cunha Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diogo Cunha Ferreira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferreira, D.C., Marques, R.C. A step forward on order-α robust nonparametric method: inclusion of weight restrictions, convexity and non-variable returns to scale. Oper Res Int J 20, 1011–1046 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0370-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0370-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation