Abstract
Introduction
The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetries of three different external beam whole breast radiotherapy techniques: two-dimensional RT (2D-RT), three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT), and field-in-field intensity-modulated RT (FiF-IMRT). In addition, we aimed to evaluate the patients who needed more or less complex treatment modalities.
Methods
Thirty patients were included in the study. All the patients had earlystage breast cancer and conserving surgery had been performed. Plans that employed the three techniques were generated for each patient. Dosimetric comparisons were conducted, and correlations with patient characteristics and dosimetric outcomes were analyzed.
Results
The 2D-RT technique was found to be suboptimal for treating the intact breast. Its dose homogeneity index (DHI) was 20.68. The authors were unable to define a patient characteristic in which 2D-RT dosimetry would perform better. FiF-IMRT was found to be the superior technique with a better homogeneity in the breast (DHI=9.35 and P=0.000002 when compared to 3D-CRT). When compared according to patient characteristics, again the FiF-IMRT planning is the best for all subgroups, but the DHI gets worse by increased breast volume and separation. While FiF-IMRT achieves better DHI in the breast, it has little effect on heart and lung doses. But the normal tissues’ volume (cc) that gets the 100% of the prescribed dose (V100) was lowered because of the treatment without wedges and scatter and with less monitor unit.
Conclusions
2D-RT could not be performed safely on the intact breast in any of the subgroups. FiF-IMRT is a superior technique for breast dosimetry, and normal tissue. For patients with large breast size or separation, further intensive techniques must be investigated.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300.
Julien JP, Bijker N, Fentiman IS, et al. Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. Lancet. 2000;355:528–533.
Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer: N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–1232.
Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–1241.
Grégoire V, Mackie TR. ICRU committee on volume and dose specification for prescribing, recording and reporting special techniques in external photon beam therapy: conformal and IMRT. Radiother Oncol. 2005:76:S71.
Hurkmans CW, Borger JH, Bos LJ, et al. Cardiac and lung complication probabilities after breast cancer irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 2000;55:145–151.
Nishioka A, Ogawa Y, Hamada N, Terashima M, Inomata T, Yoshida S. Analysis of radiation pneumonitis and radiation-induced lung fibrosis in breast cancer patients after breast conservation treatment. Oncol Rep. 1999;6:513–517.
Paszat LF, Mackillop WJ, Groome PA, Schulze K, Holowaty E. Mortality from myocardial infarction following postlumpectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;43:755–762.
Donovan E, Bleakley N, Denholm E, et al. Randomised trial of standard 2D radiotherapy (RT) versus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients prescribed breast radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2007;82:254–264.
Beavis AW. Treatment planning challenges in breast irradiation: the ideal and the practical. Clin Oncol. 2006;18:200–209.
Smith W, Menon G, Wolfe N, Ploquin N, Trotter T, Pudney D. IMRT for the breast: a comparison of tangential planning techniques. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:1231–1241.
Ercan T, Igdem S, Alço G, et al. Dosimetric comparison of field in field intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique with conformal radiotherapy techniques in breast cancer. Jpn J Radiol. 2010;28:283–289.
Wu Q, Mohan R, Morris M, Lauve A, Schmidt-Ullrich R. Simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. I: dosimetric results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:573–585.
Moon SH, Shin KH, Kim TH, et al. Dosimetric comparison of four different external beam partial breast irradiation techniques: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, helical tomotherapy, and proton beam therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2009;90:66–73.
Van der Laan HP, Hurkmans CW, Kuten A, Westernberg HA. Current technological clinical practice in breast radiotherapy; results of a survey in EORTC-Radiation Oncology Group affiliated institutions. Radiother Oncol. 2010;94:280–285.
Munshi A, Pai RH, Phurailatpam R, et al. Do all patients of breast carcinoma need 3-dimensional CT-based planning? A dosimetric study comparing different breast sizes. Med Dosim. 2009;34:140–144.
Teh AY, Park EJ, Shen L, Chung HT. Threedimensional volumetric analysis of irradiated lung with adjuvant breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:1309–1315.
Leonardi MC, Brambilla MG, Zurrida S, et al. Analysis of irradiated lung and heart volumes using virtual simulation in postoperative treatment of stage I breast carcinoma. Tumori. 2003;89:60–67.
Kong FM, Klein EE, Bradley JD, et al. The impact of central lung distance, maximal heart distance, and radiation technique on the volumetric dose of the lung and heart for intact breast radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;5:963–971.
Bauduceau O, Bollet MA, Pons P, et al. The use of computed tomography in radiotherapy treatment planning for breast cancer. How does conventional radiotherapy planning compare with virtual? J BUON. 2008;13:245–251.
Edlund T, Gannett D. A single isocenter technique using CT-based planning in the treatment of breast cancer. Med Dosim. 1999;24:239–245.
Aref A, Thornton D, Youssef E, et al. Dosimetric Improvements following 3D planning of tangential breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:1569–1574.
Torre N, Figueroa CT, Martinez K, Riley S, Chapman J. A comparative study of surface dose and dose distribution for intact breast following irradiation with field in field technique vs. the use of conventional wedges. Med Dosim. 2004;29:109–114.
Herrick JS, Neill CJ, Rosser PF. A comprehensive clinical 3-dimensional dosimetric analysis of forward planned IMRT and conventional wedge planned techniques for intact breast radiotherapy. Med Dosim. 2008;33:62–70.
Lee JW, Hong S, Choi KS, et al. Performance evaluation of field-in-field technique for tangential breast irradiation. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:158–163.
Barnett GC, Wilkinson J, et al. A randomised controlled trial of forward planned radiotherapy (IMRT) for early breast cancer: baseline characteristics and dosimetry results. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92:34–41.
Ohashi T, Takeda A, Shigematsu N, et al. Dose distribution analysis of axillary lymph nodes for three-dimensional con formal radiotherapy with a field-in-field technique for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:80–87.
Moody AM, Mayles WP, Bliss JM, A’Hern RP, Owen JR, Regan J, et al. The influence of breast size on late radiation effects and association with radiotherapy dose inhomogeneity. Radiother Oncol. 1994;33:106–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Gursel, B., Meydan, D., Ozbek, N. et al. Dosimetric comparison of three different external beam whole breast irradiation techniques. Adv Therapy 28, 1114–1125 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-011-0078-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-011-0078-1