Abstract
One study has examined the month-to-month effectiveness of the daily report card (DRC) intervention for students with disruptive behavior, yet these findings have not been replicated. With a sample of 37 student–teacher dyads (Kindergarten—5th grade), we sought to replicate previous findings with an independent sample and advance the literature by using a nonparametric effect size (ES) that accounts for baseline trends, examining academic and behavioral DRC target behaviors separately, and examining differences between optimal and suboptimal intervention responders. Replicating findings from the previous study, large improvement in behavioral and academic DRC target behaviors was demonstrated in the first month of intervention, with small incremental gains and/or maintenance of effects observed in months 2, 3, and 4. Differences assessed between optimal and suboptimal responders were not statistically significant. However, trends, particularly those for optimal and suboptimal responders to behavioral targets on the DRC, suggest that teacher consistency in responding to classroom rule violations is an important variable for future study. The results replicate previous findings and suggest important directions for future research on classroom intervention implementation and intervention decision making.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Including treatment condition as a covariate in all MANOVA and MANCOVA analyses comparing differences between optimal and suboptimal responders did not change the pattern of results. It was omitted from the presented analyses for ease of interpretation.
References
Barbaresi, W. J., Katusic, S. K., Colligan, R. C., Weaver, A. L., & Jacobsen, S. J. (2007). Long-term school outcomes for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A population-based perspective. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 28(4), 265–273.
Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & McDougal, J. L. (2002). Good, bad, or in-between: How does the daily behavior report card rate? Psychology in the Schools, 39(2), 157–169.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analyses for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. J., McGoey, K. E., Ikeda, M. J., & Anastopoulos, A. D. (1998). Reliability and validity of parent and teacher ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16(1), 55–68.
Evers, W. J., Tomic, W., & Brouwers, A. (2004). Burnout among teachers: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions compared. School Psychology International, 25(2), 131–148.
Fabiano, G. A., Pelham, W. E., Jr., Waschbusch, D. A., Gnagy, E. M., Lahey, B. B., Chronis, A. M., et al. (2006). A practical measure of impairment: Psychometric properties of the Impairment Rating Scale in samples of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and two school-based samples. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35(3), 369–385.
Fabiano, G. A., Vujnovic, R. K., Pelham, W. E., Waschbusch, D. A., Massetti, G. M., Pariseau, M. E., et al. (2010). Enhancing the effectiveness of special education programming for children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder using a daily report card. School Psychology Review, 39(2), 219–239.
Frank, J. L., & Kratochwill, T. R., (2014). School-based problem-solving consultation. In W. P Erchul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.) Handbook of Research in School Consultation, 2nd Edition (pp. 18–39). New York: Routledge.
Fristad, M. A., Teare, M., Weller, E. B., Weller, R. A., & Salmon, P. (1998). Study III: Development and concurrent validity of the Children’s Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes—parent version (P-ChIPS). Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 8(4), 221–226.
Gage, N. A., & Lewis, T. J. (2014). Hierarchical linear modeling meta-analysis of single-subject design research. The Journal of Special Education, 48, 3–16.
Girio, E. L., & Owens, J. S. (2009). Teacher acceptability of evidence-based and promising treatments for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. School Mental Health, 1, 16.
Greene, R. W., Beszterczey, S. K., Katzenstein, T., Park, K., & Goring, J. (2002). Are students with ADHD more stressful to teach? Patterns of teacher stress in an elementary school sample. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(2), 79–89.
Iznardo, M., Rogers, M. A., Volpe, R. J., Labelle, P. R., & Robaey, P. (2017). The effectiveness of Daily Behavior Report Cards for children with ADHD: A meta-analysis. Journal of Attention Disorders, advance online publication.. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054717734646.
Jurbergs, N., Palcic, J., & Kelley, M. L. (2007). School-home notes with and without response cost: Increasing attention and academic performance in low-income children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(3), 358.
Keenan, K., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2000). More than the terrible twos: The nature and severity of behavior problems in clinic-referred preschool children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28(1), 33–46.
Kelley, M. L. (1990). School-home notes: Promoting children’s classroom success. New York: Guilford.
Kos, J. M., Richdale, A. L., & Hay, D. A. (2006). Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and their teachers: A review of the literature. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 53(2), 147–160.
Loe, I. M., & Feldman, H. M. (2007). Academic and educational outcomes of children with ADHD. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(6), 643–654.
Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 304–316.
Murray, D. W., Rabiner, D., Schulte, A., & Newitt, K. (2008). Feasibility and integrity of a parent–teacher consultation intervention for ADHD students. Child & Youth Care Forum, 37, 111–120.
Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Gilbertson, D. N., Ranier, D. D., & Freeland, J. T. (1997). Increasing teacher intervention implementation in general education settings through consultation and performance feedback. School Psychology Quarterly, 12(1), 77.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, 1–8.
Owens, J. S., Coles, E. K., Evans, S. W., Himawan, L. K., Girio-Herrera, E., Holdaway, A. S., et al. (2017). Using multi-component consultation to increase the integrity with which teachers implement behavioral classroom interventions: A pilot study. School Mental Health, 9, 218–234.
Owens, J. S., Evans, S. W., Coles, E. K., Holdaway, A. S., Dawson, A. E., Mixon, C. S., et al. (2020). Consultation for classroom management and targeted interventions: Examining benchmarks for teacher practices that produce desired change in student behavior. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 28(1), 52–64.
Owens, J. S., Holdaway, A. S., Smith, J., Evans, S. W., Himawan, L. K., Coles, E. K., et al. (2018). Rates of common classroom behavior management strategies and their associations with challenging student behavior in elementary school. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26(3), 156–169.
Owens, J. S., Holdaway, A. S., Zoromski, A. K., Evans, S. W., Himawan, L. K., Girio-Herrera, E., et al. (2012). Incremental benefits of a daily report card intervention over time for youth with disruptive behavior. Behavior Therapy, 43(4), 848–861.
Owens, J. S., Murphy, C. E., Richerson, L., Girio, E. L., & Himawan, L. K. (2008). Science to practice in underserved communities: The effectiveness of school mental health programming. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(2), 434–447.
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Davis, J. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35(4), 303–322.
Pelham, W. E., Jr., Fabiano, G. A., & Massetti, G. M. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(3), 449–476.
Pelham, W., Greiner, A., & Gnagy, E. (2008). Student behavior teacher response observation code manual. Unpublished manual.
Pyle, K., & Fabiano, G. A. (2017). Daily report card intervention and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis of single-case studies. Exceptional Children, 83(4), 378–395.
Reid, R., Gonzalez, J. E., Nordness, P. D., Trout, A., & Epstein, M. H. (2004). A meta-analysis of the academic status of students with emotional/behavioral disturbance. The Journal of Special Education, 38(3), 130–143.
Robb, J. A., Sibley, M. H., Pelham, W. E., Foster, E. M., Molina, B. S., Gnagy, E. M., et al. (2011). The estimated annual cost of ADHD to the US education system. School Mental Health, 3, 169–177.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 611.
Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., Davis, C. R., Mason, B. A., & Burke, M. D. (2010). Effective intervention for behavior with a daily behavior report card: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 39(4), 654.
Vannest, K. J., & Ninci, J. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(4), 403–411.
Volpe, R. J., & Fabiano, G. A. (2013). Daily behavior report cards: An evidence-based system of assessment and intervention. New York: Guilford Press.
Wehby, J. H., Lane, K. L., & Falk, K. B. (2003). Academic instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(4), 194–197.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Institute of Education Sciences (R324A120272). The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the US Department of Education. The authors express their gratitude to the educators, administrators, and families in the participating school districts for their collaboration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical Standard
Procedures were approved by the institutional review boards at both universities and within all school districts. All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holdaway, A.S., Hustus, C.L., Owens, J.S. et al. Incremental Benefits of a Daily Report Card Over Time for Youth with Disruptive Behavior: Replication and Extension. School Mental Health 12, 507–522 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-020-09375-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-020-09375-w