Abstract
Quality in laboratory has huge impact on diagnosis and patient management as 80–90% of all diagnosis is made on the basis of laboratory tests. Monitoring of quality indicators covering the critical areas of pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phases like sample misidentification, sample rejection, random and systemic errors, critical value reporting and TATs have a significant impact on performance of laboratory. This study was conducted in diagnostic laboratories receiving approximately 42,562 samples for clinical chemistry, hematology and serology. The list of quality indicators was developed for the steps of total testing process for which errors are frequent and improvements are possible. The trend was observed for all the QI before and after sensitisation of the staff over the period of 12 months. Incomplete test requisition form received in the lab was the most poor quality indicator observed (7.89%), followed by sample rejection rate (4.91%). Most significant improvement was found in pre- and post-analytical phase after sensitisation of staff but did not have much impact on analytical phase. Use of quality indicators to assess and monitor the quality system of the clinical laboratory services is extremely valuable tool in keeping the total testing process under control in a systematic and transparent way.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kohn IT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington: National Academy Press; 1999.
Brennan TA, Gawande A, Thomas E, Studdert D. Accidental deaths, saved lives and improved quality. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1405–9.
Lippi G. Governance of preanalytical variability: travelling the right path to the bright side of the moon? Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404:32–6.
American clinical laboratory association (ACLA). The value of clinical laboratory services. Web accessed February 4, 2009 at http://www.Clinical-labs.org/issues/value/index.shtml.
O’Kane M. The reporting, classification and grading of quality failures in the medical laboratory. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404:28–31.
McCay l, Lemer C, Wu AW. Laboratory safety and the WHO world alliance for patient safety. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404:6–11.
Phlebani M. Quality specifications: self pleasure for clinical laboratories or added value for patient management? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:462–6.
Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. The IFCC working group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404:79–85.
Howanitz PJ. Errors in laboratory medicine: practical lessons to improve patient safety. Arch Path Lab Med. 2005;129:1252–61.
Phlebani M. Exploring the iceberg of errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404:16–23.
Dale JC, Novis DA. Outpatient phlebotomy success and reasons for specimen rejection: a Q-probes study. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126:416–9.
Stark S, Jones BA, Chapman D, Well K, Krajenta R, Meier FA, Zarbo RJ. Clinical laboratory specimen rejection: association with the site of patient care and patients’ characteristics. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:19–26.
Chawla R, Goswami B, Singh B, Chawla A, Gupta VK, Mallika V. Evaluating laboratory performance with quality indicators. Labmedicine. 2000;41(5):297–300.
Ricos C, Garcia-Victoria M, de la Fuente B. Quality indicators and specifications for the extra analytical phases in clinical laboratory management. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004;42:578–82.
Dighe AS, Jones JB, Parham S, Lewandrowski KBS. Survey of critical value reporting and reduction of false-positive critical value results. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:1666–71.
Howanitz PJ, Steindel SJ, Heard NV. Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a college of American pathologists’ Q-probe study in 623 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126:663–9.
Kirchner MJ, Funes VA, Adzet CB, Clar MV, Escuer MI, Girona JM, et al. Quality indicators and specifications for key processes in clinical laboratories: a preliminary experience. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:672–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agarwal, R., Chaturvedi, S., Chhillar, N. et al. Role of Intervention on Laboratory Performance: Evaluation of Quality Indicators in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Ind J Clin Biochem 27, 61–68 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-011-0182-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-011-0182-7