Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Application of Perioperative Transfusion Trigger Score in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment of Malignant Tumor

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the clinical effects of the brand new perioperative transfusion trigger score (POTTS) system in patients undergoing malignant tumor surgeries. 442 cases of patients diagnosed with malignant tumor were randomly selected (from January 2012 to December 2016) from Zunyi Medical University and were divided into 3 experimental groups. Patients in the POTTS group were transfused by the POTTS guideline perioperatively, while patients in the 7–10 g group were treated by the traditional transfusion guidelines existed (restrictive transfusion strategy), patients in the 10 g group should be transfused to keep the Hb level no less than 10 g/dL (liberal transfusion strategy). Baseline information, operation time, bleeding volume, transfusion amount, incision healing time, postoperative complications, metastasis and recurrence were observed and recorded. Postoperative short-term mortality was comparable of the 3 groups, 3 cases of death all occurred in 10 g group, there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, including infectious complications and coagulation related complications. Follow-up to date, there were 25 cases, 29 cases and 29 cases of tumor recurrence and metastasis in the three groups, but no statistical difference observed. The present findings show that the POTTS transfusion system is more advantageous with regard to save blood and relieve economic burdens of patients, and does not affect the long-term recurrence and metastasis rate of malignant tumor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McGrath C (2016) Blood transfusion strategies for hemostatic resuscitation in massive trauma. Nurs Clin North Am 51(1):83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deveau SR (2016) Blood products and their use in traumatic major haemorrhage. Emerg Nurse 23(9):31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carson JL (2015) The shifting paradigm for transfusion of red blood cells. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 13(3):152–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Klein HG, Flegel WA, Natanson C (2015) Red blood cell transfusion: precision vs imprecision medicine. JAMA 314(15):1557–1558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodnough LT, Shah N (2015) Is there a "magic" hemoglobin number? Clinical decision support promoting restrictive blood transfusion practices. Am J Hematol 90(10):927–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Adjuvant Therapies (2006) Practice guidelines for perioperative blood transfusion and adjuvant therapies: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on perioperative blood transfusion and adjuvant therapies. Anesthesiology 105:198–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy MF, Wallington TB, Kelsey P et al (2001) Guidelines for the clinical use of red cell transfusions. Br J Haematol 113:24–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA et al (1999) A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med 340:409–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lacroix J, Hebert PC, Hutchison JS et al (2007) Transfusion strategies for patients in pediatric intensive care units. N Engl J Med 356:1609–1619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hajjar LA, Vincent JL, Galas FR et al (2010) Transfusion requirements after cardiac surgery: the TRACS randomized controlled trial. JAMA 304:1559–1567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu X, Chen W, Liu Z et al (2016) Safety and current status of blood transfusion in China: an update. Lancent Haematol 3(2):e60–e62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carson JL, Carless PA, Hebert PC (2013) Outcomes using lower vs higher hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion. JAMA 309(1):83–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang TM (2015) Red blood cell replacement, ornanobiotherapeutics with enhanced red blood cell functions? Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 43(3):145–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keyhanian Sh, Ebrahimifard M, Zandi M (2014) Investigation on artificial blood or substitute blood replace the natural blood. Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol 4(2):72–77

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar R, Sedky MJ, Varghese SJ et al (2016) Transfusion Related Acute Lung Injury (TRALI): a single institution experience of 15 years. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 32(3):320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Takei T, Amin NA, Schmid G et al (2009) Progress in global blood safety for HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 52:127–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Berra L, Pinciroli R, Stowell CP et al (2014) Autologous transfusion of stored red blood cells increases pulmonary artery pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190(7):800–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rerambiah LK, Rerambiah LE, Bengone C et al (2014) The risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infections at the Gabonese National Blood Transfusion Centre. Blood Transfus 12(3):330–333

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen A, Trivedi AN, Jiang L et al (2015) Hospital blood transfusion patterns during major noncardiac surgery and surgical mortality. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(32):e1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hovaguimian F, Myles PS (2016) Restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy in the perioperative and acute care settings: a context-specific systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology 125(1):46–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prescott LS, Taylor JS, Lopez-Olivo MA et al (2016) How low should we go: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in oncology. Cancer Treat Rev 46:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohde JM, Dimcheff DE, Blumberg N et al (2014) Health care-associated infection after red blood cell transfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 311:1317–1326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gantt CL (1981) Red blood cells for cancer patients. Lancet 2(8242):363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Claas FH, Roelen DL, van Rood JJ et al (2001) Modulation of the alloimmune response by blood transfusions. Transfus Clin Biol 8(3):315–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Blumberg N, Heal J, Chuang C et al (1988) Ferther evidence supporting a cause and effect relationship between blood transfusion and earlier cancer recurrence. Ann Surg 207(4):410–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vidal O, Metges JP, Elizalde I et al (2009) High preoperative serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels predict poor clinical outcome after curative resection of gastric cancer. Br J Surg 96(12):1443–1451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim JK, Kim HS, Park J et al (2016) Perioperative blood transfusion as a significant predictor of biochemical recurrence and survival after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. PLoS ONE 11(5):e0154918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hwang HK, Jung MJ, Lee SH et al (2016) Adverse oncologic effect s of intraoperative transfusion during pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: the need for strict transfusion policy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 23(8):497–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mortensen Frank V (2011) Cause-specific mortality associated with leukoreduced, buffy coat-depleted, or no blood transfusion after elective surgery for colorectal cancer a postrial 15-year follow-up study. Transfusion 51(2):259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Francis DM (1991) Relationship between blood and tumour behaviour. Br J Surg 78(12):1420–1428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vamvakas E, Moore SB (1993) Perioperative blood transfusion and colorectal cancer recurrence: a qualitative statistical overview and meta-analysis. Transfusion 33(9):754–765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. McGehee RP, Dodson MK, Moore JL et al (1994) Effect of blood transfusion in patients with gynecologic malignancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 46(1):45–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Greenawalt JA, Zernell D (2017) Autologous blood transfusion for postpartum hemorrhage. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 42(5):269–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gonzalez DO, Cooper JN, Mantell E et al (2017) Perioperative blood transfusion and complications in children undergoing surgery for solid tumors. J Surg Res 216:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Eckel AM, Hess JR (2017) Transfusion practice in trauma resuscitation. South Med J 110(8):554–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pérel Y, Runel C, Huguenin Y et al (2017) Transfusion and its specific problems in pediatrics and neonatology. Transfus Clin Biol 24(3):101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nixon CP, Tavares MF, Sweeney JD (2017) How do we reduce plasma transfusion in Rhode Island? Transfusion 57(8):1863–1873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present authors would like to acknowledge all the authors of the original studies included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, People’s Republic of China

    Fan Zhang, Zhao-Qiong Zhu & De-Xing Liu

  2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, People’s Republic of China

    Ze-Bing Zheng

  3. Department of Anesthesiology and Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China

    Jin Liu

  4. Department of Anesthesiology, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563003, Guizhou, People’s Republic of China

    Fan Zhang

Authors
  1. Fan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ze-Bing Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhao-Qiong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. De-Xing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fan Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, F., Zheng, ZB., Zhu, ZQ. et al. Application of Perioperative Transfusion Trigger Score in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment of Malignant Tumor. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 36, 156–163 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-019-01180-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-019-01180-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation