Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting the vibration of tennis racquets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measurements and calculations are presented on the vibration of the handle of a tennis racquet. It is shown that the vibration amplitude depends primarily on the stiffness of the racquet, but it also depends on the mass of the racquet, the mass distribution, the vibration frequency, the impact location, the impact duration, the stiffness of the ball and the stiffness of the string plane. Mass added at the tip of a racquet usually reduces handle vibrations when the ball impacts near the tip, but it increases handle vibrations for impacts in the throat region. Mass added to the handle usually reduces handle vibrations, regardless of the impact point. Mass added at a vibration node point has no effect on the vibration frequency, only a small effect on amplitude, and can usefully be added to very light and stiff racquets to increase racquet power without affecting the low vibration amplitude of these racquets. The amplitude of the fundamental vibration mode decreases as the impact duration increases, decreasing to zero at all impact points when the impact duration is 1.5 times longer that the fundamental vibration period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kotze J, Lammer H, Cottey R, Zirngibl W (2003) The effects of active piezo fiber rackets on tennis elbow. In: Miller S (ed) Tennis science and technology, 2nd edn. ITF, London, pp 55–60

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brody H (1989) Vibration damping of tennis rackets. J Sports Biomech 5:293–296

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brody H, Cross R, Lindsey C (2002) The physics and technology of tennis. Racquet Tech Publishing, Solana Beach

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li F-X, Fewtrell D, Jenkins M (2004) String vibration dampers do not reduce racket frame vibration transfer to the forearm. J Sports Sc 22:1041–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cross R (2001) Customising a tennis racket by adding weights. Sports Eng. 4:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cross R (1999) Dynamic properties of tennis balls. Sports Eng. 2:22–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cross R (1999) Impact of a ball with a bat or racket. Am J Phys 67(8):692–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cross R (2000) Flexible beam analysis of the effects of string tension and frame stiffness on racket performance. Sports Eng 3:111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodwill S, Haake S (2003) Modelling of an impact between a tennis ball and racket. Tennis science and technology 2. International Tennis Federation, London, pp 79–86

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nathan A (2000) Dynamics of the baseball bat collision. Am J Phys 68(11):979–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reynolds D, Standlee K, Angevine E (1977) Hand-arm vibration. Part III, Subjective response characteristics of individuals to hand-induced vibration, Journal of Sound and Vibration 51(2):267–282

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cross R, Nathan A (2009) Performance versus moment of inertia of sporting implements. Sports Technol 2(1–2):7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rod Cross.

Appendices

Appendix A: Fourier transform of half-sine waveform

Any function \(v(t)\) that is symmetrical about \(t = 0\) can be expressed in the form \(v(t) = \int _{0} ^{ \infty } a(\omega ) \cos (\omega t)\, \mathrm{d}\omega \) where \(a(\omega ) = (1/\pi ) \int _{-\infty } ^{ \infty } v(t) \cos (\omega t) \, \mathrm{d}t\) is the Fourier transform of \(v(t)\). A symmetric half-cos function is \(v(t) = v_{0} \cos (\omega _{0} t)\) when \(-\tau _{0} < t < \tau _{0}\) and \(v(t) = 0\) when \(t < -\tau _{0}\) or \(t > \tau _{0}\) where \(\tau _{0} = \pi /(2\omega _{0})\). The Fourier transform of this function is

$$\begin{aligned} a(\omega ) &= \frac{v_{0}}{\pi } \int _{-\tau _{0}} ^{ \tau _{0}} \cos (\omega _{0} t) \cos (\omega t) \, {\mathrm{d}t}\\ &= \frac{v_{0}}{\pi } \int _{0} ^{ \tau _{0}} [ \cos (\omega _{0} + \omega )t + \cos (\omega _{0} - \omega ) t] \, {\mathrm{d}}t \end{aligned}$$

which is easily integrated to give

$$\begin{aligned} a(\omega ) = \frac{ v_{0} \cos (\omega \tau _{0})}{\tau _{0} (\omega _{0}^{2} - \omega ^{2}) } \, . \end{aligned}$$

The duration of \(v(t)\) is \(\tau = 2\tau _{0}\). \(a(\omega )\) is not zero when \(\omega \tau _{0} = \pi /2\) since then \(\omega _{0} = \omega \). The first zero of \(a(\omega )\) is at \(\omega \tau _{0} = 1.5 \pi \) and then \(f = \omega / (2\pi ) = 1.5/\tau \). Typical results relevant to racquets are shown in Fig. 13.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Fourier transforms for half-sine waveforms of duration \(\tau = 5\), 6 and 7 ms

Appendix B: Three-element beam model

Consider a rectangular beam of mass \(M\) and length \(L\) constructed from three uniform sections each of length \(L/3\) and with masses \(m_{1}\), \(m_{2}\) and \(m_{3}\). The total mass is \(M = m_{1}+m_{2}+m_{3}\) and the balance point is located at distance \(B = (m_{1} + 3m_{2} + 5m_{3})L/(6M)\) from the \(m_{1}\) end. The moment of inertia about the \(m_{1}\) end is \(I = (m_{1} + 7m_{2} + 19m_{3})L^{2}/27\). Measurements of \(M\), \(B\) and \(I\) can therefore be used to determine \(m_{1}\), \(m_{2}\) and \(m_{3}\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cross, R. Factors affecting the vibration of tennis racquets. Sports Eng 18, 135–147 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-015-0173-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-015-0173-7

Keywords

Navigation