Skip to main content
Log in

The static and dynamic stiffness behaviour of composite golf shafts and their constituent materials

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Golf shafts are normally characterised using static or quasi-static tests, yet the golf swing itself is dynamic. The purpose of this research was to determine whether stiffness properties obtained from these tests can be used when modelling the dynamic behaviour of golf shafts made from carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP). Three shafts, matched for all properties except shaft flex, were subjected to human swing testing by 12 skillful players whilst strains were recorded. Peak principal strains as well as strain rates increased as shaft flex decreased (p < 0.001). CFRP flat panels with lay-ups similar to those contained in the shafts were constructed and tested statically and at strain rates between 10−4 and 4 s−1. Some level of strain-rate dependency was found for these panels, but only for strain rates exceeding those seen during a swing, which suggests that static material tests are appropriate for measuring the dynamic stiffness of golf shafts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strangwood M (2003) Materials in golf. In: Jenkins M (ed) Materials in sports equipment. Woodhead, Cambridge, pp 129–159

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheong SK, Kang KW, Jeong SK (2006) Evaluation of the mechanical performance of golf shafts. Eng Fail Anal 13(3):464–473. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.12.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Howell DD (1992) The design of filament wound graphite/epoxy golf shafts. In: Grimes G (ed) Materials working for you in the 21st century. 37th international SAMPE symposium. SAMPE, Anaheim, pp 1392–1405

    Google Scholar 

  4. McClung AJW, Ruggles-Wrenn MB (2008) The rate (time)-dependent mechanical behavior of the PMR-15 thermoset polymer at elevated temperature. Polym Test 27(7):908–914. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilat A, Goldberg RK, Roberts GD (2002) Experimental study of strain-rate-dependent behavior of carbon/epoxy composite. Compos Sci Technol 62(10–11):1469–1476. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00100-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vinson JR, Woldesenbet E (2001) Fiber orientation effects on high strain rate properties of graphite/epoxy composites. J Compos Mater 35(6):509–521. doi:10.1177/002199801772662136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. MacKenzie S, Sprigings E (2009) Understanding the role of shaft stiffness in the golf swing. Sports Eng 12(1):13–19. doi:10.1007/s12283-009-0028-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Swanek D, Carey J (2007) Braided composite materials for the production of lightweight, high rigidity golf shafts. Sports Eng 10(4):195–208. doi:10.1007/bf02933571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kenny I, McCloy A, Wallace E, Otto S (2008) Segmental sequencing of kinetic energy in a computer-simulated golf swing. Sports Eng 11(1):37–45. doi:10.1007/s12283-008-0005-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nesbit SM (2007) Development of a full-body biomechanical model of the golf swing. Int J Model Simul 27(4):392–404. doi:10.2316/Journal.205.2007.4.205-4599

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kenny IC, Wallace ES, Brown D, Otto SR (2006) Validation of a full-body computer simulation of the golf drive for clubs of differing length. In: Moritz EF, Haake S (eds) The engineering of sport 6, vol 2. Springer, New York, pp 11–16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Milne RD, Davis JP (1992) The role of the shaft in the golf swing. J Biomech 25(9):975–983. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(92)90033-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Butler JH, Winfield DC (1994) The dynamic performance of the golf shaft during the downswing. In: Cochran AJ, Farrally MR (eds) Science and golf II: proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf. E & FN Spon, London, pp 259–264

    Google Scholar 

  14. Horwood GP (1994) Golf shafts—a technical perspective. In: Cochran AJ, Farrally MR (eds) Science and golf II: proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf. E & FN Spon, London, pp 247–258

    Google Scholar 

  15. Newman S, Clay S, Strickland P (1997) The dynamic flexing of a golf club shaft during a typical swing. In: Proceedings of the fourth annual conference on mechatronics and machine vision in practice. Toowoomba, Australila, pp 265–270

  16. Lee N, Erickson M, Cherveny P (2002) Measurement of the behaviour of a golf club during the golf swing. In: Thain E (ed) Science and golf IV: proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf. Routledge, London, pp 374–385

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huntley MP, Davis CL, Strangwood M, Otto SR (2006) Comparison of the static and dynamic behaviour of carbon fibre composite golf club shafts. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers part L. J Mater Des Appl 220(L4):229–236. doi:10.1243/14644207JMDA74

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weeks CA, Sun CT (1998) Modeling non-linear rate-dependent behavior in fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 58(3–4):603–611. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00183-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Slater C, Otto SR, Strangwood M (2010) The quasi-static and dynamic testing of damping in golf clubs shafts fabricated from carbon fibre composites. Procedia Eng 2(2):3361–3366. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huntley MP, Davis CL, Strangwood M (2004) Characterisation of ‘seams’ in carbon-fibre composite golf shafts. In: Hubbard M, Mehta RD, Pallis JM (eds) The engineering of sport 5, vol 2. International Sports Engineering Association, Sheffield, pp 223–229

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huntley MP (2007) Comparison of static and dynamic carbon fibre composite golf club shaft properties and their dependence on structure. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham

  22. Sun CT, Kim W (2002) Modeling relaxation of a polymeric composite during loading and unloading. J Compos Mater 36:745–755. doi:10.1177/0021998302036006477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R&A Rules Limited (2007) Procedure for measuring the length of golf clubs (excluding Putters)—Protocol. http://www.randa.org/en/Equipment/Protocols%20and%20Procedures/Clubs/Club%20Length.aspx. Accessed 19th August 2010

  24. Maltby RD (1995) Golf club design, fitting, alteration, and repair: the principles and procedures. R. Maltby Enterprises, Newark

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hocknell A, Jones R, Rothberg S (1996) Experimental analysis of impacts with large elastic deformation: I. Linear motion. Meas Sci Technol 7(9):1247–1254. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/7/9/009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roberts JR, Jones R, Rothberg SJ (2001) Measurement of contact time in short duration sports ball impacts: an experimental method and correlation with the perceptions of elite golfers. Sports Eng 4(4):191–203. doi:10.1046/j.1460-2687.2001.00084.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils F. Betzler.

Appendix

Appendix

Based on the definitions provided in Fig. 8, it is possible to find the following relationship between measured and principal strain:

$$ \varepsilon_{{{\text{a}}/{\text{b}}}} = \varepsilon \cdot \cos \left( {\varphi_{\varepsilon } - \varphi_{\text{a/b}} } \right), $$
(3)

where ε a/b is the magnitude of the strain at positions a or b (μm/m), ε is the magnitude of the principal strain (μm/m), φ ε is the orientation of the principal strain (rad), and φ a/b is the orientation of positions a and b (rad).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Shaft cross-section with nomenclature for principal strain calculation

Rearranging (3) yields:

$$ \varphi_{\varepsilon } = \arctan \left( {\frac{{\varepsilon_{\text{b}} \cos \left( {\varphi_{\text{a}} } \right) - \varepsilon_{\text{a}} \cos \left( {\varphi_{\text{b}} } \right)}}{{\varepsilon_{\text{a}} \sin \left( {\varphi_{\text{b}} } \right) - \varepsilon_{\text{b}} \sin \left( {\varphi_{\text{a}} } \right)}}} \right). $$
(4)

It is further possible to calculate the principal strain for any given output from the two strain gauges at positions a and b from Eq. (3):

$$ \varepsilon = 0.5\;\left( {\frac{{\varepsilon_{\text{a}} }}{{\cos \left( {\varphi_{\text{e}} - \varphi_{\text{a}} } \right)}} + \frac{{\varepsilon_{\text{b}} }}{{\cos \left( {\varphi_{\text{e}} - \varphi_{\text{b}} } \right)}}} \right). $$
(5)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Betzler, N.F., Slater, C., Strangwood, M. et al. The static and dynamic stiffness behaviour of composite golf shafts and their constituent materials. Sports Eng 14, 27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-011-0068-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-011-0068-1

Keywords

Navigation