Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Could ductoscopy alleviate the need of microdochectomy in pathological nipple discharge?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Microdochectomy is the gold-standard for definitive diagnosis for pathological nipple discharge (PND); however, problem of over-treating exists since majority of PND are self-limiting and due to benign causes. Ductoscopy may assist diagnosis, and triage patients for intervention or expectant management. This study aimed to evaluate if ductoscopy could reduce unnecessary microdochectomy but not compromising the diagnosis of malignancy.

Method

A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in consecutive patients of PND without a suspected malignancy on routine diagnostic evaluation. Ductoscopy was performed with attempts to remove intraductal lesions if they were found. Microdochectomy was carried out if there were positive intraductal lesions, but failed endoscopic extraction, or failed ductoscopy and persistent PND. Efficacy of ductoscopy was determined by cannulation success rate, number of avoided surgery and number of missed malignancy.

Results

In a 3-year period between 2016 and 2018, a total of 223 ductoscopy were performed and 94.2% had successful cannulation. Within such, 59.5% (N = 125) had intraductal mass identified, and 82 microdochectomy were carried out. The final histology showed 15 malignancy, making the overall malignancy rate 6.7%. Ductoscopy successful and negative patients (N = 85, 37.8%) were triaged for surveillance and the malignancy rate is 0% in a median follow-up of 2 years; hence, microdochectomy was avoided.

Conclusion

PND with non-suspicious conventional imaging and negative ductoscopy have rare malignancy rate which makes subsequent microdochectomy unnecessary. However, intraductal mass in ductoscopy is a predictor for malignancy so definitive histology diagnosis is mandatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seltzer MH. Breast complaints, biopsies, and cancer correlated with age in 10,000 consecutive new surgical referrals. Breast J. 2004;10(2):111–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lau S, Kuchenmeister I, Stachs A, Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T. Pathologic nipple discharge: surgery is imperative in postmenopausal women. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(7):546–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dolan RT, Butler JS, Kell MR, Gorey TF, Stokes MA. Nipple discharge and the efficacy of duct cytology in evaluating breast cancer risk. Surgeon. 2010;8(5):252–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Istomin A, Masarwah A, Pitkanen M, Joukainen S, Sutela A, Vanninen R, et al. Galactography is not an obsolete investigation in the evaluation of pathological nipple discharge. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0204326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baydoun S, Gonzalez P, Whitman GJ, Dryden M, Xi Y, Dogan B. Is Ductography still warranted in the 21st century? Breast J. 2019;25(4):654–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lustig DB, Warburton R, Dingee CK, Kuusk U, Pao JS, McKevitt EC. Is microductectomy still necessary to diagnose breast cancer: a 10-year study on the effectiveness of duct excision and galactography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;174(3):703–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morrogh M, Morris EA, Liberman L, Borgen PI, King TA. The predictive value of ductography and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(12):3369–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Gelder L, Bisschops RH, Menke-Pluymers MB, Westenend PJ, Plaisier PW. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with unilateral bloody nipple discharge; useful when conventional diagnostics are negative? World J Surg. 2015;39(1):184–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang LJ, Wu P, Li XX, Luo R, Wang DB, Guan WB. Magnetic resonance imaging features for differentiating breast papilloma with high-risk or malignant lesions from benign papilloma: a retrospective study on 158 patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simmons R, Adamovich T, Brennan M, Christos P, Schultz M, Eisen C, et al. Nonsurgical evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(2):113–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lesetedi C, Rayne S, Kruger D, Benn CA. Indicators of breast cancer in patients undergoing microdochectomy for a pathological nipple discharge in a middle-income country. J Surg Res. 2017;220:336–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Galvin R, Joyce D, Downey E, Boland F, Fahey T, Hill AK. Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule to identify suspected breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vargas HI, Vargas MP, Eldrageely K, Gonzalez KD, Khalkhali I. Outcomes of clinical and surgical assessment of women with pathological nipple discharge. Am Surg. 2006;72(2):124–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Waaijer L, Simons JM, Borel Rinkes IH, van Diest PJ, Verkooijen HM, Witkamp AJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ductoscopy in patients with pathological nipple discharge. Br J Surg. 2016;103(6):632–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kamali S, Bender O, Aydin MT, Yuney E, Kamali G. Ductoscopy in the evaluation and management of nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(3):778–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Waaijer L, van Diest PJ, Verkooijen HM, Dijkstra NE, van der Pol CC, Borel Rinkes IH, et al. Interventional ductoscopy in patients with pathological nipple discharge. Br J Surg. 2015;102(13):1639–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Balci FL, Feldman SM. Interventional ductoscopy for pathological nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(10):3352–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu M, Guo G, Xie F, Wang S, Yang H. Mammary ductoscopy and follow-up avoid unnecessary duct excision in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(2):139–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Makita M, Akiyama F, Gomi N, Iwase T. Mammary ductoscopy and watchful follow-up substitute microdochectomy in patients with bloody nipple discharge. Breast Cancer. 2016;23(2):242–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Makita M, Akiyama F, Gomi N, Iwase T, Kasumi F, Sakamoto G. Endoscopic and histologic findings of intraductal lesions presenting with nipple discharge. Breast J. 2006;12(5 Suppl 2):S210–S217217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Denewer A, El-Etribi K, Nada N, El-Metwally M. The role and limitations of mammary ductoscope in management of pathologic nipple discharge. Breast J. 2008;14(5):442–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Han Y, Li J, Han S, Jia S, Zhang Y, Zhang W. Diagnostic value of endoscopic appearance during ductoscopy in patients with pathological nipple discharge. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rose C, Bojahr B, Grunwald S, Frese H, Jager B, Ohlinger R. Ductoscopy-based descriptors of intraductal lesions and their histopathologic correlates. Onkologie. 2010;33(6):307–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamamoto D, Tsubota Y, Yoshida H, Kanematsu S, Sueoka N, Uemura Y, et al. Endoscopic appearance and clinicopathological character of breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2011;31(10):3517–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Louie LD, Crowe JP, Dawson AE, Lee KB, Baynes DL, Dowdy T, et al. Identification of breast cancer in patients with pathologic nipple discharge: does ductoscopy predict malignancy? Am J Surg. 2006;192(4):530–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dietz JR, Crowe JP, Grundfest S, Arrigain S, Kim JA. Directed duct excision by using mammary ductoscopy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Surgery. 2002;132(4):582–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamali S, Bender O, Kamali GH, Aydin MT, Karatepe O, Yuney E. Diagnostic and therapeutic value of ductoscopy in nipple discharge and intraductal proliferations compared with standard methods. Breast Cancer. 2014;21(2):154–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Simpson JS, Connolly EM, Leong WL, Escallon J, McCready D, Reedijk M, et al. Mammary ductoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of pathologic nipple discharge: a Canadian experience. Can J Surg. 2009;52(6):E245–E248248.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zervoudis S, Tamer V, Iatrakis G, Bothou A, Tokou X, Augoulea A, et al. Improving ductoscopy with duct lavage and duct brushing. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2014;35(5):548–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ava Kwong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, YK., Chen, C.TH., Wang, M. et al. Could ductoscopy alleviate the need of microdochectomy in pathological nipple discharge?. Breast Cancer 27, 607–612 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01051-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01051-w

Keywords

Navigation