Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidentally Detected Carcinoma Gallbladder in Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gall bladder carcinoma (GBC) is most prevalent in the northern and northeastern states of India. The term ‘Incidental gall bladder carcinoma’ (IGBC) refers to the diagnosis coming as a surprise finding upon histopathological examination of the cholecystectomy specimen and its incidence varies from 0.35–2%. The conventional practice of submitting all excised gall bladder specimens for histopathological examination has also been challenged by some authors who feel that a selective approach should be adopted, in order to save costs and time. Our experience in this respect, from a tertiary level teaching hospital in southwestern India, is presented here along with a review of literature. Data in respect of all patients who underwent cholecystectomy for benign disorders from 01 Dec 2012 to 30 Nov 2014 was collected prospectively. In addition, retrospective collation of data from hospital records for the previous 2 years was undertaken. Gall bladder wall thickness ≥ 4 mm, on USG examination, was taken as abnormal. All excised gall bladder specimens were opened and examined immediately after surgery in the operation theatre and then submitted for histopathological examination. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. A total of 1123 patients underwent cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder pathologies. IGBC was detected in seven (three male and four female) patients. Only one, out of these seven patients, had focal gallbladder wall thickening at the fundus while the other six cases did not have any macroscopic abnormality of the gallbladder wall or mucosa. The mean age of the patients with IGBC was 63.86 years and it was significantly higher as compared to those with benign histology (p value = 0.001). Furthermore, an age of more than 50 years was found to be significantly associated with IGBC (X 2 = 9.446, p value = 0.002). In this series, IGBC was present in 0.62% of patients undergoing cholecystectomy for benign gall bladder pathologies. A patient’s age of more than 50 years was significantly associated with IGBC and we did not find any correlation between the symptomatology, ultrasound findings and macroscopic appearance of the specimen and the presence of IGBC. Hence, we feel that the practice of routine submission of all excised gall bladders for HPE should continue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grobmyer SR, Lieberman MD, Daly JM (2004) Gallbladder cancer in the twentieth century: single institution’s experience. World J Surg 28:47–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nandakumar A, Gupta PC, Gangadharn P, Visweswara RN, Parkin DM (2005) Geographic pathology revisited: development of an atlas of cancer in India. Int J Cancer 116:740–754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Consensus document for management of gall bladder cancer (2014) ICMR; 17

  4. Yamamoto H, Hayakawa N, Kitagawa Y et al (2005) Unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 12(5):391–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S, Sen B (2009) Incidental carcinoma gall bladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease. Surg Endosc 23(9):2041–2046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59(4):225–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhir V, Mohandas KM (1999) Epidemiology of digestive tract cancers in India IV, gall bladder and pancreas. Indian J Gastroenterol 18:24–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wistuba II, Gazdar AF (2004) Gallbladder cancer: lessons from a rare tumour. Nat Rev Cancer 4(9):695–706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gulwani HV, Gupta S, Kaur S (2015) Incidental detection of carcinoma gall bladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy specimens: a thirteen year study of 23 cases and literature review. Indian J Surg Oncol 6(1):30–35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Royal College of Pathologists (2005) Histopathology of limited or no clinical value. Report of working group of the Royal College of Pathologists, 2nd edn. Royal College of Pathologists, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Talreja V, Ali A, Khawaja R, Rani K, Samnani SS, Farid NF (2016) Surgically resected gall bladder: is histopathology needed for all? Surg Res Pract 2016:9319147. doi:10.1155/2016/9319147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Darmas B, Mahmud S, Abbas A, Baker AL (2007) Is there any justification for the routine histological examination of straightforward cholecystectomy specimens? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(3):238–241

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Emmett CD, Barrett P, Gilliam AD, Mitchell AI (2015) Routine versus selective histological examination after cholecystectomy to exclude incidental gallbladder carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97(7):526–529

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jamal K, Ratansingham K, Siddique M, Nehra D (2014) Routine histological analysis of a macroscopically normal gallbladder—a review of the literature. Int J Surg 12(9):958–962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wakai T, Shirai Y, Yokoyama N et al (2001) Early gallbladder carcinoma does not warrant radical resection. Br J Surg 88:675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abramson MA, Pandharipande P, Ryan D, Gold JS, Whang EE (2009) Radical resection for T1b gallbladder cancer: a decision analysis. HPB (Oxford) 11(8):656–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lundberg O, Kristoffersson A (1999) Port site metastases from gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results of a Swedish surgery and review of published reports. Eur J Surg 165:215–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Darabos N, Stare R (2004) Gallbladder cancer: laparoscopic and classic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18:144–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schaeff B, Paolucci V, Thomopoulos J (1998) Port site recurrences after laparoscopic surgery. A review. Dig Surg 15:124–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fong Y, Brennan MF, Turnbull A, Colt DG, Blumgart LH (1993) Gallbladder cancer discovered during laparoscopic surgery. Potential for iatrogenic tumour dissemination. Arch Surg 128(9):1054–1056

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Clair DJ, Lautz DB, Brooks DC (1993) Rapid development of umbilical metastases after laparoscopy cholecystectomy for unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma. Surgery 114:355

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maker AV, Butte JM, Oxenberg J et al (2012) Is port site resection necessary in the surgical management of gallbladder cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 19(2):409–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. S. Jaiswal.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, A., Jaiswal, S.S. Incidentally Detected Carcinoma Gallbladder in Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy. Indian J Surg 80, 369–372 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-017-1614-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-017-1614-2

Keywords

Navigation