Skip to main content
Log in

The Application of Science- and Risk-Based Concepts to Drug Substance Stability Strategies

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) has provided practical guidance on the amount and type of drug substance stability data needed to support marketing applications (International Conference on Harmonization 2001, 2002, 2003a, b). Additional guidance has been issued by the World Health Organization (WHO 2009). Recent scientific advances and practices have resulted in improved scientific understanding of the chemical and physical attributes that contribute directly or indirectly to drug substance stability. Combining this improved understanding with the science- and risk-based approaches detailed in ICH Q8, Q9, and Q10 allows for alternative and more scientifically driven approaches to meet the scientific and regulatory objectives for drug substance stability (International Conference on Harmonization 2005, 2008, 2009). In this paper, proposals are presented to more fully leverage enhanced product knowledge to design improved stability strategies. The chemical and physical attributes that potentially impact drug substance stability are discussed, and strategies that leverage accelerated stability studies are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. International Conference on Harmonization. International Conference on Harmonization Guideline Q1A(R2): stability testing of new drug substances and drug products. Rockville: FDA; 2003a.

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Conference on Harmonization. International Conference on Harmonization Guideline Q1D: bracketing and matrixing designs for stability testing of new drug substances and drug products. Rockville: FDA; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Conference on Harmonization. International Conference on Harmonization Guideline Q1E: evaluation of stability data. Rockville: FDA; 2003b.

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Conference on Harmonization. International Conference on Harmonization Guideline Q7A: good manufacturing practice guidance for active pharmaceutical ingredients. Rockville: FDA; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. WHO. Stability testing of active pharmaceutical ingredients and finished pharmaceutical products. In: WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations. 43rd report. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2009, Annex 2 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 953).

  6. International Conference on Harmonization. International Conference on Harmonization Guideline Q8(R2): pharmaceutical development. Rockville: FDA; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  7. International Conference on Harmonization. International Conference on Harmonization Guideline Q9: quality risk management. Rockville: FDA; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. International Conference on Harmonization. International Conference on Harmonization Guideline Q10: pharmaceutical quality system. Rockville: FDA; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Waterman KC, Carella AJ, Gumkowski MJ, Lukulay P, Macdonald BC, Roy MC, Shamblin SL. Improved protocol and data analysis for accelerated shelf-life estimation of solid dosage forms. Pharm Res. 2007;24(4):780–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Skrdla PJ, Wang T, Antonucci V, Dowling T, Ge Z, Ellison D, Curran J, Mohan G, Wyvratt J. Use of a quality-by-design approach to justify removal of the HPLC weight % assay from routine stability testing protocols. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2009;50:794–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weaver R. AAPS Annual Meeting presentation stability risk assessments with a focus on physical stability issues. 2011.

  12. Co-Rapporteur Day 80 Critical Assessment Report for a New Chemical Entity. 2012.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Bob Baum, Stephane Caron, Chi-wan Chen, Dave Damon, Allan Edwards, John Groskoph, Chuck Hoiberg, Vince McCurdy, Megan McMahon, Julian Meekings, Greg Sluggett, Robert Timpano, Ken Waterman, Kevin Ryan, Roger Weaver, and PhRMA Stability Expert Team.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen T. Colgan.

Additional information

Some of these concepts were presented at the AAPS Current Trends in Stability Workshop (Washington, D.C., September 2009): Colgan S. “The Application of Quality by Design’s Science and Risk Based Concepts to API Stability Strategies”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colgan, S.T., Watson, T.J., Whipple, R.D. et al. The Application of Science- and Risk-Based Concepts to Drug Substance Stability Strategies. J Pharm Innov 7, 205–213 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-012-9135-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-012-9135-9

Keywords

Navigation