Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multibeam Acoustic Detection of Fish and Water Column Targets at High-Flow Sites

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential rapid development of tidal energy and accompanying structures in the coastal waters in several regions of Canada, and the world, will require subsurface sampling tools to monitor and evaluate the biological and environmental effects of this new industry. Proposed development sites are characterized by large tidal ranges, strong tidal flows, extreme turbulence, and in some cases sediment-laden water restricting visibility, imposing monitoring challenges. Turbulence-induced acoustic backscatter typically occurs in the top 10–20 m, but can extend from the surface to bottom during some phases of the tide. In Minas Passage, turbulence accounted for 78 % of the total water column backscatter making the separation of fish difficult if not impossible at times. In this paper, we examine operational capabilities of two high-frequency multibeam sonars to meet these monitoring challenges in the nearshore high-flow shallow coastal waters (1–100 m). Observations from proposed sites are used to illustrate the challenges as well as the advantages, and limitations, of multibeam sonars compared to conventional split beam technology in strong tidal currents and turbulent waters. Acoustic multibeam hardware necessary to meet the monitoring demands is currently available, but the processing and analytical software required to advance their application is insufficient to meet the requirements for effects and impact monitoring. It is anticipated that the required advancements will be available within the next 5 years. Challenges associated with equipment deployment, power supply, and communications are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alstom 2013. Tidal Power Solutions. http://www.alstom.com/Global/Power/Resources/ Documents/Brochures/tidal-power-solutions-ocean-energy.pdf. 8p.

  • Anonymous 2012. Explore Tidal Power. EnergyBC-Tidal. http://www.energybc.ca/ profiles/tidal.html.

  • Anonymous 2008. Report of the fishing gear technology work group to the Management and Science Committee. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, Rehoboth beach, Delaware. 122p.

  • Brede, R., Kristensen, F. H., Solli, H., Ona, E. 1990. Target tracking with a split-beam echo sounder. - Rapp. P.-v. Rkun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 189: 254–263.

  • Charlier, R.H. 2003. Sustainable co-generation from the tides: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 7(3): 187–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, D., Baldwin, K. C., Foote, K. G., Li, Y., Mayer, L. A., Melvin, G. D. 2001. Multibeam sonar calibration: target localization in azimuth. Proc. Oceans’ 2001, Nov. 6–8, Honolulu, HI, vol. 4, pp. 2506–2510.

  • Chu, D., Baldwin, K. C., Foote, K. G., Li, Y., Mayer, L. A., Melvin, G. D. (2001) Multibeam sonar calibration: removal of static surface reverberation by coherent echo subtraction. Proc. Oceans’ 2001, Nov. 6–8, Honolulu, HI, vol. 4, pp. 2498–2502.

  • Cochrane, N.A., Y. Li, and G.D. Melvin. 2003. Quantification of a multibeam sonar for fisheries assessment applications. J Acoust Soc Am 114: 745–758.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R.E., and J.K. Jorgenson. 1996. Quantitative studies of Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) schools: important energy stores in the Arctic food web. Arctic 49(2): 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronkite, G., T. Mulligan, J. Holmes, and H. Enzenhofer. 2007. Categorising salmon migration behaviour using characteristics of split-beam acoustic data. Aquat Living Resour 20: 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragesund, O., and S. Olsen. 1965. On the possibility of estimating year-class strength by measuring echo-sounder abundance of O-group fish. Fisk Dir Skr Ser Havunders 13: 47–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECUA 2012. 11th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics. July, 2–6, 2012. Edinburgh, UK.

  • Ehrenberg, J.E., and T.C. Torkelson. 1996. Application of dual-beam and split beam target tracking in fisheries acoustics. ICES J Mar Sci 53: 329–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enzenhofer, H.J., N. Olsen, and T.J. Mulligan. 1998. Fixed-location riverine hydroacoustics as a method of enumerating migrating adult Pacific salmon: comparison of split-beam acoustics vs. visual counting. Aquat Living Resour 11: 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote, K.G., H.P. Knudsen, and G. Vestnes. 1983. Standard calibration of echosounders and integrators with optimal copper spheres. Fisk Dir Skr Ser Havunders 17: 335–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, K. G., Knudsen, H. P., Vestnes, G., MacLennan, D. N., Simmonds, E. J. 1987. Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation: a practical guide. ICES Coop. Res. Rep. 144. 57p.

  • Foote, K. G., Chu, D., Hammar, T. R., Baldwin, K. C., Mayer, L. A., Hufnagle, L. C., Jech, J. M., Jr. 2005. Protocols for calibrating multibeam sonar. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117 (4), Pt. 1. 2013–2027.

  • FORCE 2011. Fundy tidal Energy Demonstration Project—Environmental Effects Monitoring Report Appendix H. Fish Surveys 2010- Final Report. CEF Consultants Ltd, Halifax Nova Scotia, Canada. 62p.

  • Gerlotte, F., Freon, P., Soria, P., Cottais, P. H., Ronzier, L. 1994. Exhaustive observations of 3D school structure using multibeam side scan sonar, potential use for school classification, biomass estimation and behaviour. ICES CM 1994/B:26. 12pp.

  • Gerlotto, F., M. Soria, and P. Fréon. 1999. From two dimensions to three: the use of multibeam sonar for a new approach in fisheries acoustics. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56: 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlotto, F., Paramo, J. 2003. The three-dimensional morphology and internal structure of clupeid schools as observed using vertical scanning multibeam sonar. Aquatic Living Resources Volume 16(3): Acoustics in Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology. Part 2: 113–122.

  • Harvey, L. D. D. 2010. Energy and the new reality 2, carbon-free energy supply. Earthscan LTD. ISBN-10: 1849710732 .PP 313–320.

  • Henderson, M.J., J.K. Horne, and R.H. Towler. 2007. The influence of beam position and swimming direction on fish target strength. ICES J Mar Sci 65: 226–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne, J. K. 2012. Spatial and temporal variability in pelagic communities at marine kinetic energy sites. European Commission Underwater Acoustic (ECUA) Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland July 2012. Presentation.

  • IFremer 2006. Movies + An acoustic detection software. http://flotte.ifremer.fr/content/ download/2358/53677/file/Movies-va-98025.pdf. 6p.

  • Kang, Myounghee. 2011. Analysis of the ME70 multibeam echo-sounder data in Echoview—current capability and future directions. J Mar Sci Technol 19(3): 312–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, J., Bhuyan, G. S. 2012. ‘Ocean Energy: Global Technology Development Status.’ IEA-OES. 2009. May 30, 2012.

  • Korneliussen, R. J., Ona, E., Eliassen, I., Heggelund, Y., Patel, R., Godø, O. R., Giertsen, C., Patel, D., Nornes, E., Bekkvik, T., Knudsen, H. P., Lien, G. 2006. The Large Scale Survey System—LSSS. Proceedings of the 29th Scandinavian Symposium on Physical Acoustics, Ustaoset 29 January – 1 February 2006. 6p.

  • Korneliussen, R.J., and E. Ona. 2002. An operational system for processing and visualizing multi-frequency acoustic data. ICES J Mar Sci 159: 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecornu, L., Burdin, V., Scalabrin, C., Hamitouche, C. 1998. Fish school analysis from multibeam sonar image processing, OCEANS '98 Conference Proceedings, vol.1, no., pp.587-591 vol.1, 28 Sep-1 Oct 1998 doi: 10.1109/OCEANS.1998.725814.

  • Maclennan, D.N., and E.J. Simmonds. 1992. Fisheries acoustics. London: Chapman & Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLennan, D.N., P.G. Fernandes, and J. Dalen. 2002. A consistent approach to definitions and symbols in fisheries acoustics. ICES J Mar Sci 59: 365–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B., Whitt, C., McPherson, C., Gerber, A., Scotney, M. 2012. Measurement of long-term ambient noise and tidal turbine levels in the Bay of Fundy. Australian Acoustical Society. Proceedings of Acoustics 2012 – Fremantle, Australia. 7p.

  • Mayer, L.A., Y. Li, and G.D. Melvin. 2002. 3-D visualization for pelagic fisheries assessment and research. ICES J Mar Sci 59: 216–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melvin, G. D., Cochrane, N. A. 2012. A preliminary investigation of fish distribution near an in-stream tidal turbine in Minas Passage, Bay of Fundy. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (in press).

  • Melvin, G. D., Cochrane, N. A. 2013. Investigation of the vertical distribution, movement and abundance of fish in the vicinity of proposed tidal power energy conversion devices. Final Report, OEER/OETR Research Project 3000-170-09-12. 377p. (Submitted for review).

  • Melvin, G. D., Y. Li, L. A., Mayer, and A. Clay. 2002. Commercial fishing vessels, automated acoustic logging systems and 3D visualization. ICES J Mar Sci 59:179–190.

  • Melvin, G.D., N.A. Cochrane, and Y. Li. 2003. Extraction and comparison of acoustic backscatter from a calibrated multi and single beam sonar. ICES J Mar Sci 60(3): 670–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melvin, G.D., N.A. Cochrane, and P. Fitzgerald. 2009. Evaluation of single and multi-beam sonar technology for water column target detection in an acoustically noisy environment. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 2840: 27p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melvin, G. D., Fox, P. A., Condiotty, J. 2012. Adaption of the M3 multi-beam sonar to fisheries applications and environmental monitoring. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics. 8p. (In press).

  • Messer, H.S. 1996. On the achievable accuracy of two kinds of active interferometers. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 32(3): 1158–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misund, O.A., A. Aglen, and E. Fronases. 1995. Mapping the shape, size, and density of fish schools by echo integration and a high resolution sonar. ICES J Mar Sci 52: 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myriax 2013. Echoview—echosounder and sonar data processing software. Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. http://www.echoview.com/.

  • Nicholls-Lee, R. F., Turnock, S. R. 2008. Tidal energy extraction: renewable, sustainable and predictable. Science Progress. 91:1 pg. 81–111. http://www.swetswise.com.

  • Norris, J. 2012. Acoustic monitoring at the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) test sites. European Commission Underwater Acoustic (ECUA) Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland July 2012. Presentation.

  • NRCan 2008. Review of Marine energy technologies and Canada’s R&D capacity. National Resources Canada – Canmet ENERGY Technology Centre (CETC), Ottowa: 227p.

  • Oceans 2009. Current in Minas Basin, May 1, 2008 – March 29, 2009. Current Data Report to Minas Basin Pulp and Paper, May 2009. Oceans Ltd, Halifax, Nova Scotia: 170p.

  • Perrot, Y., J. Guillard, and E. Josse. 2010. Convergence and divergence between two multibeam sonars (SIMRAD SM20 and RESON SeaBat 6012) used to extract the spatial, morphologic and energy parameters of fish schools. Fish Res 106(3): 378–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, E. H. A. 2013. Exploiting tidal energy potential. Dawn.com Newspaper, published 2013-09-09.

  • Simmonds, E. J., MacLennan, D. N. 2005. Fisheries acoustics: theory and practice. Blackwell Publishing. 437pp.

  • Simmonds, E. J., Gerlotto, F., Fernandes, P. G., Maclennan, D. N. 2000. Observation and extraction of three dimensional information on fish schools. ASA Annual Conference Berlin, June 2000.

  • Steig, T.W., and V. Johnston. 1996. Monitoring fish movement patterns in a reservoir using horizontally scanning split-beam techniques. ICES J Mar Sci 53: 435–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarbotton, M., Larson, M. 2006. Canada ocean energy atlas (phase 1) potential tidal current energy resources analysis background report. Prepared For: Canadian Hydraulics Centre, Ottawa, Ontario. Triton Consultants Ltd. 41p.

  • Trenkel, V.M., V. Mazauric, and L. Berger. 2008. The new fisheries multibeam sounder ME70: description and expected contributions to fisheries research. ICES J Mar Sci 65: 645–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willianson, B., Blondel, P. 2012. Multibeam imaging of the environment around marine renewable energy devices. European Commission Underwater Acoustic (ECUA) Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland July 2012. Presentation.

  • Xie, Y., C.G.J. Michielsens, and F.J. Martens. 1998. Classification of fish and non-fish acoustic tracks using discriminant function analysis. ICES J Mar Sci. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsr198.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Population Ecology Division, St Andrews Biological Station, 531 Brandy Cove Road, St Andrews, New Brunswick, E5B 2L9, Canada

    Gary D. Melvin

  2. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ocean and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, 1 Challenger Drive, PO Box 1006, Dartmouth, B2Y4A2, Nova Scotia, Canada

    Norman A. Cochrane

Authors
  1. Gary D. Melvin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Norman A. Cochrane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary D. Melvin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Melvin, G.D., Cochrane, N.A. Multibeam Acoustic Detection of Fish and Water Column Targets at High-Flow Sites. Estuaries and Coasts 38 (Suppl 1), 227–240 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9828-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9828-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation