Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of wool surface modification on fluorocarbon chain re-orientation

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an increasing demand for air-dry performance of fluorocarbon finished materials. Thus, surface modifications of wool fabrics were evaluated. Untreated, gaseous fluorinated, Chlorine/Hercosett processed 100 % wool fabrics were treated with different fluorochemicals and their liquid repellency after washing, and dry cleaning were evaluated. The results indicated that Chlorine-Hercosett treated samples, wool with a positive charge, after few washing cycles, showed better air dry performance with higher level of repellent properties. In addition, the comparison of the wool surface modifications treatment with different applied fluorochemicals, with different commercial formulations, illustrated that the fluorocarbon chain re-orientation and fastness properties are more affected by the nature of the wool surface while the used fluorocarbons showed more or less similar behaviours. In general, the fluorination increases fabric stiffness with lower fabric formability. The surface interface was effectively probed by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, XPS, which enabled the characterisation of the loss of surface lipids, the nature of the fibre oxidation and the deposition of fluoropolymers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Kissa, “Handbook of Fibre Science and Technology”, Part B: Functional Finishes (M. Lewin and S. B. Sello Eds.), Vol. 2, p.143, New York, Marcel Dekker, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Grottenmuller, Melliand Textilber, 79, 743 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. M. Corpart and A. Dessaint, Melliand Textilber, 78, 625 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. I. Holm, J. Text. Inst., 84, 520 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Audenaert, H. Lens, D. Rolly, and P. Vander Elst, J. Text. Inst., 90, 76 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Shao, Ph.D. UMIST, Manchester, 1998.

  7. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Inc. P.O. Box CH-4002 Basel (www.cibasc.com), Germany.

  8. Rudolf GmbH Altvaterstraße 58-64 82538 Geretsried (www.rudolf.de), Germany.

  9. C. Carr, A. Khoddami, and S. Coulson, “Novel Product and Method”, WO/2011/064562, June, 2011.

  10. 3M Technical Data, Test Methods, Oil Repellency Test I, July 1996.

  11. 3M Technical Data, Test Methods, Water Repellency Test II-Water/Alcohol Drop Test, July 1996.

  12. C. D. Wagner, Anal. Chem., 44, 1050 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Kawabata, “The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation, Second Ed.”, The Hand Evaluation and Standardization Committee, The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, Japan, 1980.

  14. A. G. De Boos, Text. Progr., 20, 4 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Lewis, Wool Science Review, 54, 2 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Naebe, P. G. Cookson, R. Denning, and X. Wang, J. Text. Inst., 12, 948 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. N. Carr, S. F. Ho, D. M. Lewis, E. D. Owen, and M. W. Roberts, J. Text. Inst., 76, 419 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. C. Dhingra, D. Liu, and R. Postle, Text. Res. J., 59, 357 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Gong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khoddami, A., Gong, H. & Ghadimi, G. Effect of wool surface modification on fluorocarbon chain re-orientation. Fibers Polym 13, 28–37 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-012-0028-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-012-0028-9

Keywords

Navigation