Skip to main content
Log in

Creating round focused micro-jets from rectangular nozzles

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A focused jet is an axisymmetric jet of liquid surrounded by an outer coaxial gas jet. The gas jet is typically used to compress the liquid jet in the radial direction thereby focusing it. At microscales, it is difficult to manufacture micro-scale delivery nozzles (needles) and to consistently align and axially position the liquid and the gas needles. However, it is very easy, using standard etching technologies to make precise and repeatable rectangular nozzle designs. This work will therefore explore the geometric and fluid dynamics constraints that allow one to design rectangular nozzles that produce round coaxial micro-jets of liquid and gas. Because of the small scales, the fluid dynamics of the focusing jet is unusual, and this work demonstrates that the liquid jet is best focused by shear stretching and not via gas compression. This paper shows that sheet jetting occurs when the Reynolds number of the gas is too high. Dripping occurs when the Weber number of the liquid is too low. The desired round jet occurs by balancing Weber number of the liquid jet and Reynolds number of the gas such that surface tension at the interface holds the water jet round while the acceleration of the water jet due to shear at the interface from fast-moving air causes the liquid jet cross-sectional area to decrease. The goal of this initial paper is to demonstrate that a parameter region exists where this flow behavior is possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

U :

Velocity

ρ :

Density of fluid

μ :

Viscosity of fluid

α:

Volume fraction of liquid phase

Θ:

Material property of fluid

k:

Turbulent kinetic energy

ω:

Specific rate of turbulence dissipation

μ T :

Turbulent viscosity

L WaterInlet :

Length of side of square water inlet

h Outlet :

Height of outlet of nozzle

Wb Water :

Weber number of water at the water inlet

Re Air :

Reynolds number of air at nozzle outlet

air :

Mass flowrate of air in nozzle

water :

Mass flowrate of water in nozzle

D :

Diameter of liquid jet at outlet

D 0 :

Diameter of liquid jet at mesh resolution specified

References

  1. B. de Gans, P. C. Duineveld and U. S. Schubert, Inkjet printing of polymers: State of the art and future developments, Advanced Materials, 16 (3) (2004) 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Derby, Inkjet printing of functional and structural materials: Fluid property requirements, feature stability, and resolution, Annual Review of Materials Research, 40 (2010) 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O. Carneiro, A. Silva and R. Gomes, Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene, Materials & Design, 83 (2015) 768–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Som, A. I. Ramirez and D. E. Longman, Effect of nozzle orifice geometry on spray, combustion, and emission characteristics under diesel engine conditions, Fuel, 90 (3) (2011) 1267–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Faeth, L. Hsiang and P. Wu, Structure and breakup properties of sprays, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 21 (1995) 99–127.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. H. N. Chapman, P. Fromme and A. Barty, Femtosecond Xray protein nanocrystallography, Nature, 470 (7332) (2011) 73.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. DePonte, U. Weierstall and K. Schmidt, Gas dynamic virtual nozzle for generation of microscopic droplet streams, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 41 (19) (2008) 195505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. V. Fridrikh, H. Y. Jian and M. P. Brenner, Controlling the fiber diameter during electrospinning, Physical Review Letters, 90 (14) (2003) 144502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Oberthuer, J. Knoška and M. O. Wiedorn, Double-flow focused liquid injector for efficient serial femtosecond crystallography, Scientific Reports, 7 (2017) 44628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. M. Gañán-Calvo and J. M. Montanero, Revision of capillary cone-jet physics: Electrospray and flow focusing, Physical Review E, 79 (6) (2009) 066305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. H. McKinley and M. Renardy, Wolfgang Von Ohnesorge, Physics of Fluids, 23 (12) (2011) 127101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Trebbin, K. Krüger and D. DePonte, Microfluidic liquid jet system with compatibility for atmospheric and highvacuum conditions, Lab on a Chip, 14 (10) (2014) 1733–1745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Rosello, G. Maîtrejean and D. C. Roux, Influence of the nozzle shape on the breakup behavior of continuous ink jets, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 140 (3) (2018) 031202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. I. Ngo, S. W. Joo and C. Byon, Effects of junction angle and viscosity ratio on droplet formation in microfluidic cross-junction, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 138 (5) (2016) 051202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Carroll and C. Hidrovo, Droplet detachment mechanism in a high-speed gaseous microflow, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 135 (7) (2013) 071206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Jasak, A. Jemcov and Z. Tukovic, OpenFOAM: A C library for complex physics simulations, International Wokshop on Coupled Method in Numerical Dynamics, 1000 (2007) 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Bellouard, A. Said and M. Dugan, Fabrication of highaspect ratio, micro-fluidic channels and tunnels using femtosecond laser pulses and chemical etching, Optics Express, 12 (10) (2004) 2120–2129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. I. Ansys, Cfd, ICEM CFD Theory Guide, Ansys Inc. (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Henderson, J. Ahrens and C. Law, The ParaView Guide, Kitware Inc, Clifton Park, NY (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Towns, T. Cockerill and M. Dahan, XSEDE: Accelerating scientific discovery, Computing in Science & Engineering, 16 (5) (2014) 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. S. Deshpande, L. Anumolu and M. F. Trujillo, Evaluating the performance of the two-phase flow solver interfoam, Computational Science & Discovery, 5 (1) (2012) 014016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. B. E. Larsen, D. R. Fuhrman and J. Roenby, Performance of interfoam on the simulation of progressive waves, Coastal Engineering Journal (2019) 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. R. Menter, Two-equation Eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA Journal, 32 (8) (1994) 1598–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. V. Inguva, S. V. Kathuria and O. Bilsel, Computer design of microfluidic mixers for protein/RNA folding studies, PloS One, 13 (6) (2018) e0198534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. D. Anderson, Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective, McGraw-Hill, 12 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank NSF for funding this work. The work is supported by NSF IDBR Award No. 1353942. We acknowledge the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) at The University of Texas at Austin for providing HPC, visualization and database resources that have contributed to the research results reported within this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkatesh Inguva.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Donghyun You

Venkatesh Inguva is a Post-doctoral Researcher at Universität Paderborn. He completed his Ph.D. at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. His research involves the use of computational and experimental fluid dynamics to study flows in microchannels.

Rita Graceffa is a Scientific Officer at the Industrial Liaison Office at the European XFEL. She has experience in studying micro and milliseconds timescale kinetics initiated by fast mixing, by coupling microfluidics and x-rays.

Joachim Schulz is the Group Leader for Sample Environment & Characterization at the European XFEL. His research covers sample preparation and delivery methods for high repetition rate X-ray sources. Liquid jet sample delivery for serial femtosecond crystallography on protein crystals is a focus of this research.

Osman Bilsel is a Professor at University of Massachusetts Medical School. His research focuses on the mechanisms of protein folding and misfolding. He uses microfluidic mixers, time-resolved fluorescence and small-angle x-ray scattering to better understand early events in protein folding.

Blair J. Perot is a Professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. His research spans the full spectrum of using computers to solve fluid dynamics problems, from developing numerical techniques to applied research topics in microfluidics and wind turbines.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inguva, V., Graceffa, R., Schulz, J. et al. Creating round focused micro-jets from rectangular nozzles. J Mech Sci Technol 33, 4281–4289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0824-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0824-x

Keywords

Navigation