Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical surrogate model based sampling criterion for stochastic global optimization of problems with constraints

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sequential surrogate model-based global optimization algorithms, such as super-EGO, have been developed to increase the efficiency of commonly used global optimization technique as well as to ensure the accuracy of optimization. However, earlier studies have drawbacks because there are three phases in the optimization loop and empirical parameters. We propose a united sampling criterion to simplify the algorithm and to achieve the global optimum of problems with constraints without any empirical parameters. It is able to select the points located in a feasible region with high model uncertainty as well as the points along the boundary of constraint at the lowest objective value. The mean squared error determines which criterion is more dominant among the infill sampling criterion and boundary sampling criterion. Also, the method guarantees the accuracy of the surrogate model because the sample points are not located within extremely small regions like super-EGO. The performance of the proposed method, such as the solvability of a problem, convergence properties, and efficiency, are validated through nonlinear numerical examples with disconnected feasible regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Storn and K. Price, Differential evolution: A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, J. of Global Optimization, 11 (4) (1997) 341–359.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Christopher, A. Jeffery and G. K. Michael, A genetic algorithm for function optimization: A Matlab implementation, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt Jr. and M. P. Vecchi, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science, 200 (1983) 671–680.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. D. R. Jones, The DIRECT global optimization algorithm, Encyclopedia of Optimization, 1 (2001) 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. G. Wang and S. Shan, Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization, J. of Mechanical Design, 129 (4) (2007) 370–380.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Audet, J. E. Dennis, D. W. Moore, A. Booker and A. Frank, Surrogate-model-based method for constrained optimization, Proceedings of the 8th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA-2000-4891.

  7. T. H. Lee and J. J. Jung, A sampling technique enhancing accuracy and efficiency metamodel-based RBOD: Constraint boundary sampling, Computers & Structures, 86 (13–14) (2008) 1463–1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. H. Lee, J. Y. Seung and J. J. Jung, Sequential feasible domain sampling of kriging metamodel by using penalty function, Transaction of KSME, 30 (6) (2006) 691–697.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. R. Jones, M. Schonlau and W. J. Welch, Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions, J. of Global Optimization, 13 (4) (1998) 455–492.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. M. J. Sasena, Flexibility and efficiency enhancements for constrained global design optimization with kriging approximations, Ph. D. thesis, University of Michigan (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. G. Krige, A statistical approach to some mine valuations and allied problems at the Witwatersrand, Master’s thesis, University of Witwatersrand (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Sacks, W. J. Welch, T. J. Mitchell and H. P. Wynn, Design and analysis of computer experiments, Statistical Science, 4 (4) (1989) 409–435.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. G. Watson and R. J. Barnes, Infill sampling criteria to locate extremes, Math. Geology, 27 (5) (1995) 589–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. T. H. Lee and J. J. Jung, Chapter 16: Kriging metamodel based optimization, Optimization of Structural and Mechanical Systems, J.S. Arora, World Scientific (2007) 445–486.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae Hee Lee.

Additional information

Recommended by Guest Editor Joo-Ho Choi

Su-gil Cho received Ph.D. degree in Automotive Engineering from the Hanyang University, Korea. He is currently a researcher at KRISO (Korea Research Institute of Ships& Ocean engineering), Korea. His research interests include design and analysis of computer experiments, uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization, and surrogate model based optimization.

Tae Hee Lee received Ph.D. degree at the University of Iowa in 1991 under supervision of Prof. J.S. Aroa. At various times during his career, he has held appointments at the University of Iowa in USA, Tokyo Denki University in Japan, Yeoungnam University in Korea, and Georgia Institute of Technology in USA. He received an award for excellence in academic achievement in 2013 from Korean Society for Mechanical Engineers. His research interests include design optimization, design and analysis of computer experiments, design under uncertainty, and surrogate model based optimization.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, Sg., Jang, J., Kim, J. et al. Statistical surrogate model based sampling criterion for stochastic global optimization of problems with constraints. J Mech Sci Technol 29, 1421–1427 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0313-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0313-9

Keywords

Navigation