Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Offspring sex ratio of Iranian dentists

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Objective

To assess the impact of occupational factors on the sex ratio of dentists’ children.

Methods

A randomly selected 501 Iranian dentists participated in a telephone interview. The participants were contacted by their mobile number to answer questions about demographic variables (gender, age, marriage status), practice-related variables (year of graduation as general or specialist dentist, years of clinical work, working hours, average number of radiographs taken in a day, and spouse’s job), and questions about their children (number, gender and date of birth of each child). Kruskal–Wallis and Chi-square tests served for statistical evaluation.

Results

Of all participating dentists, 71 % were men, about two-thirds were 35- to 50-year olds, and 89 % were married. In total, the dentists had 768 children; about 21 % had no child. Of all the children, 54 % were boys (overall sex ratio = 1.17). The offspring sex ratio was 1.13 among male dentists, 1.50 for female dentists, and 1.44 when both parents were dentists. Higher percentages of boys were prevalent among female dentists, younger dentists, and general dental practitioners (p < 0.008).

Conclusion

Demographic and practice-related factors showed some impact on proportions of both sexes of dentists’ children in this study. However, the result needs evaluation in further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Terrell L, Hartnett P, Marcus M. Can environmental or occupational hazards alter the sex ratio at birth. A systematic review. Emerg Health Threats J. 2011;20(4):7109. doi:10.3402/ehtj.v4i0.7109.

    Google Scholar 

  2. James WH. Behavioural and biological determinants of human sex ratio at birth. J Biosoc Sci. 2010;5:587–99. Epub 2010 Jun 3. doi: 10.1017/S002193201000012X.

  3. Ruckstuhl KE, Colijn GP, Amiot V, Vinish E. Mother’s occupation and sex ratio at birth. BMC Public Health. 2010;2010(10):269. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. James WH. How studies of human sex ratios at birth may lead to the understanding of several forms of pathology. Hum Biol. 2013;5:769–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leggat PA, Kedjarune U, Smith DR. Occupational health problems in modern dentistry: a review. Ind Health. 2007;5:611–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ayers MS, Thomson WM, Newton JT, Rich AM. Job stressors of New Zealand dentists and their coping strategies. Occup Med. 2008;4:275–81. Epub 2008 Feb 22. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqn014.

  7. Kay EJ, Lowe JC. A survey of stress levels, self-perceived health and health-related behaviours of UK dental practitioners in 2005. Br Dent J. 2008;11:E19. Epub 2008 Jun 6. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.490.

  8. ISPM-University of Bern. c2009. STROBE Guidelines. http://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=available-checklists. Accessed 11 November 2015.

  9. Hama Y, Uematsu M, Sakurai Y, Kusano S. Sex ratio in the offspring of male radiologists. Acad Radiol. 2001;5:421–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Volk B. Evaluating the sex ratio in the offspring of U.S. Navy submariners. Mil Med. 2004;11:890–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi JW, Mehrotra P, Macdonald LA, Klein LW, Linsky NM, Smith AM, et al. Sex proportion of offspring and exposure to radiation in male invasive cardiologists. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2007;3:231–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zadeh H, Briggs W. Ionising radiation: are orthopaedic surgeons’ offspring at risk. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;3:214–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Irgen A, Irgens LM. Male proportion in offspring of military air pilots in Norway. Nor Epidemiol. 1999;1:47–9. http://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/norepid/article/download/442/414. Accessed 11 November 2015.

  14. Lyster WR. Altered sex ratio in children of divers. Lancet. 1982;17(2):152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Braza F. Human prenatal investment affected by maternal age and parity. Hum Ecol. 2004;32:163–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Almond D, Edlund L. Trivers–Willard at birth and one year: evidence from US natality data 1983–2001. Proc Biol Sci. 2007;7:2491–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Iran National Annual Statistics. c2002. Statistical center of Iran. http://amar.sci.org.ir/index_f.aspx. Accessed 11 November 2015.

  18. Iran National Registration. C2008. National Organization for Civil Registration. https://www.sabteahval.ir/Upload/Modules/Contents/asset99/1393kht.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2015.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The idea for this study originated from a conversation with Dr. Shahrokh Alizadeh; we thank him. Special thanks to Carolyn Brimley Norris, Ph.D., from the University of Helsinki for language editing. We thank all participating dentists for their cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadi Ghasemi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exists.

Author contribution statement

HG contributed to the whole project from conception of the idea, writing the proposal, preparing the questions, supervising the implementation, doing the statistical analysis, and writing the manuscript. SRM performed the telephone interviews and helped in writing the manuscript. MN mainly performed the statistical analysis, and also helped in drafting the manuscript. FB contributed to the design of the study, prepared the list of dentists, and helped in implementation of the project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghasemi, H., Mirdehghan, S.R., Namdari, M. et al. Offspring sex ratio of Iranian dentists. Environ Health Prev Med 21, 446–449 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-016-0546-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-016-0546-y

Keywords

Navigation