Abstract
The purpose of this work was to examine the effects of relationship functions between diagnostic image quality and radiation dose on the governing equations for image acquisition parameter variations in X-ray imaging. Various equations were derived for the optimal selection of peak kilovoltage (kVp) and exposure parameter (milliAmpere second, mAs) in computed tomography (CT), computed radiography (CR), and direct digital radiography. Logistic, logarithmic, and linear functions were employed to establish the relationship between radiation dose and diagnostic image quality. The radiation dose to the patient, as a function of image acquisition parameters (kVp, mAs) and patient size (d), was used in radiation dose and image quality optimization. Both logistic and logarithmic functions resulted in the same governing equation for optimal selection of image acquisition parameters using a dose efficiency index. For image quality as a linear function of radiation dose, the same governing equation was derived from the linear relationship. The general equations should be used in guiding clinical X-ray imaging through optimal selection of image acquisition parameters. The radiation dose to the patient could be reduced from current levels in medical X-ray imaging.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
UNSCEAR 2008. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation Volume II. Report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. New York. United Nations; 2010.
Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop C. Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:202–8.
McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin N Am. 2009;47(1):27–40.
Silverman JD, Paul NS, Siewerdsen JH. Investigation of lung nodule detectability in low-dose 320-slice computed tomography. Med Phys. 2009;36(5):1700–10.
Zheng X, Kim TM, Davidson R, Lee S, Shin C, Yang S. CT X-ray tube voltage optimisation and image reconstruction evaluation using visual grading analysis. Proc of SPIE (Med Imaging). 2014;9033:903328_1–10.
Compagnone G, Casadio Baleni M, Di Nicola E, Valentino M, Benati M, Calzolaio LF, Oberhofer N, Fabbri E, Domenichelli S, Barozzi L. Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors. Radiol Med. 2013;118:540–54.
Zheng X, Kim M, Yang S. Optimal kVp in chest computed radiography using visual grading scores: a comparison between visual grading characteristics and ordinal regression analysis. Proc of SPIE (Med Imaging). 2016;9783:97836A1–8.
Van der Plaats GJ. Medical X-ray techniques in diagnostic radiology. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd; 1980.
International commission on radiation units and measurements. ICRU Report No. 87: Radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography. J ICRU. 2012;12(1):1–149.
Zheng XM. Attenuation based governing equations for automatic exposure and peak voltage controls in medical X-ray CT imaging. CT Theory Appl. 2016;25(6):625–32. doi:10.15953/j.1004-4140.2016.25.06.01.
Zheng X. Patient size based guiding equations for automatic mAs and kVp selections in general medical X-ray projection radiography. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2017;174(4):545–50.
Williams MB, Krupinski EA, Strauss KJ, Breeden WK, Rzeszotarski MS. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:371–88.
AAPM Task Group 116. An exposure indicator for digital radiography. College Park: American Association of Physicists in medicine; 2009. ISBN 978-1-888340-86-0.
Yu L, Li H, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH. Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. Med Phys. 2010;37:234–43.
Ching W, Robinson J, McEntee M. Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systemic review. J Med Rad Sci. 2014;61:176–90.
European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in paediatrics. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1996. ISBN 92-827-7843-6.
ICRP, Khong PL, Ringertz H, Donoghue V, Frush D, Rehani M, Appelgate K, Sanchez R. ICRP Publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnosis and interventional radiology. Ann ICRP 2013;42(2):1–63.
Zheng X. Dose correction in medical X-ray imaging at low dose regime. J Med Imaging Health Inform. 2016;6(7):1818–22. doi:10.1166/jmihi.2016.1896.
Macmillan NA, Gougalas C. Detection theory: a user’s guide. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 2004.
Strasburger H. Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function. Percept Psychophys. 2001;63(8):1348–55.
DeCarlo LT. Signal detection theory and generalized linear models. Psychol Methods. 1998;3(2):186–205.
Verdun FR, Racine D, Ott JG, Tapiovaara MJ, Toroi P, Bochud FO, Veldkamp WJH, Schegerer A, Bouwman RW, Hernandez Giron I, Marshall NW, Edyvean S. Image quality in CT: from physical measurements to model observers. Phys Med. 2015;31:823–43.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank colleagues Dr. Matthew Collins and Tony Van Schoonhoven for critical reading of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest in this work.
Research involving human or animals participants
This article does not report on any studies involving human participants or animals performed by the author.
Informed consent
Informed consent is not required.
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, X. General equations for optimal selection of diagnostic image acquisition parameters in clinical X-ray imaging. Radiol Phys Technol 10, 415–421 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-017-0413-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-017-0413-6