Skip to main content
Log in

Fostering Learning Opportunities Through Employee Participation Amid Organizational Change

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Vocations and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health care organizations are facing rapid changes, frequently involving modification of existing procedures. The case study reported here examined change processes and learning in a health care organization. The organizational change in question occurred in the emergency clinic of a Finnish central hospital where a new action model for shift-specific nursing supervision was being introduced. The aim of this study was to investigate some of the employee participation and learning opportunities amid this organizational change. The data collection was ethnographically informed, and the data consisted of audio-recorded and observed meetings, observations of the new action model, and field interviews which were analyzed qualitatively. The change appeared to occur in four phases: preparation, planning, discussion, and implementation. Structures (e.g. regular meetings open to the entire staff) and practices (e.g. open discussion) facilitating participation in the phases of the change were prerequisites for participation by individual employees, but participation was not made structurally possible throughout the change. The study confirmed the importance of participation for learning within change. In the change, participation in the form of identity work denoted individual-level learning opportunities, and participation in the form of suggestions for new practices and expression of problems facilitated organization-level learning opportunities. In this study, participation manifested itself as a more multifaceted phenomenon than in previous studies. This study provided new knowledge on employee participation and its manifestations in micro-level interaction, as well as on both individual-level and organization-level learning opportunities in organizational change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The charge nurse is a middle nurse manager, working under the head nurse, and responsible for management responsibilities such as shift rosters.

  2. Triage means assessment of the urgency of treatment. Triage nurses meet patients individually, assess their treatment needs, and decide whether they are to be admitted to the clinic.

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison, Wesley.

  • Ashmos, D. P., Huonker, J. W., & McDaniel, R. R. (1998). Participation as a complicating mechanism: the effect of clinical professional and middle manager participation on hospital performance. Health Care Management Review, 23(4), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A., Perreault, D., Reid, A., & Blanchard, C. M. (2013). Feedback and organizations: feedback is good, feedback-friendly culture is better. Canadian Psychology, 54(4), 260–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bate, P. (2000). Changing the culture of hospital: from hierarchy to networked community. Public Administration, 78(3), 485–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berends, H., Boersma, K., & Weggman, M. (2003). The structuration of organizational learning. Human Relations, 56(9), 1035–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstrøm, V. H., & Kjekshus, L. E. (2012). Leading during change: the effects of leader behavior on sickness absence in a Norwegian health trust. BMC Public Health, 12, 799–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bess, K. D., Perkins, D. D., Cooper, D. G., & Jones, D. L. (2011). A heuristic framework for understanding the role of participatory decision making in community-based non-profits. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(3/4), 236–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2002). Critiquing workplace learning discourses: Participation and continuity at work. Studies in the Education of Adults, 34(1), 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2004). Learning through work: workplace participatory practices. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace Learning in Context (pp. 109–125). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S., & Somerville, M. (2004). Transformations at work: identity and learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 309–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerregaard, T. (2011). Studying institutional work in institutions. Uses and implications of ethnographic methodologies. Journal of Organizational Change, 24(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. (2000). Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, J. S., & Boumgarden, P. (2010). Structure and learning in self-managed teams: why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organization Science, 21(3), 609–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunniss, S., & Kelly, D. R. (2008). ‘The unknown becomes the known’: collective learning and change in primary care teams. Medical Education, 42(12), 1185–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, W. W. (2008). Organization change. Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chih, W. W., Yang, F., & Chang, C. (2012). The study of the antecedents and outcomes of attitude toward organizational change. Public Personnel Management, 41(4), 597–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., Holmberg, I., Löwstedt, J., & Brommels, M. (2011). Executive management in radical change – The case of the Karolinska University Hospital merger. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27, 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin, K. (2002). Development Engineers’ conceptions of learning at work. Studies in Continuing Education, 24(2), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin, K., & Paloniemi, S. (2008). Supporting experience sharing as participatory workplace practice. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & A. Eteläpelto (Eds.), Emerging Perspectives of Workplace Learning (pp. 23–35). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collin, K., Valleala, U. M., Herranen, S., & Paloniemi, S. (2012). Ways of Interprofessional Collaboration and Learning in Emergency Work. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(3), 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conceição, S. C. O., & Altman, B. A. (2011). Training and development process and organizational culture change. Organization Development Journal, 29(1), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobers, P., & Söderholm, A. (2009). Translation and inscription in development projects. Understanding environmental and health care-related organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(5), 480–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M., & Nicolini, D. (2000). Organizational learning: debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R., & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: team learning and New technology adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 685–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., & Middleton, D. (1996). Introduction: Studying Work as Mindful Practice. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eteläpelto, A., & Lahti, J. (2008). The resources and obstacles of creative collaboration in a long-term learning community. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(3), 226–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A., Morrill, C., & Surianarain, S. (2009). Ethnography in organizational settings. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (pp. 602–619). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2001). The sociological foundations of organizational learning. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (pp. 35–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T., Hynninen, P., Lahelma, E., Metso, T., Palmu, T., & Tolonen, T. (2006). Collective ethnography, joint experiences and individual pathways. Nordisk Pedagogik [Journal of Nordic Educational Research], 26(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubbins, C., & MacCurtain, S. (2008). Understanding the dynamics of collective learning: the role of trust and social capital. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 578–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hager, P., Lee, A., & Reich, A. (2012). (Eds.). Practice, Learning and Change. Practice-Theory Perspectives on Professional Learning. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvinen, A., & Poikela, E. (2001). Modelling reflective and contextual learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(7/8), 282–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, M. M., & Parry, K. W. (2004). Identifying paradox: a grounded theory of leadership in overcoming resistance to change. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(4), 467–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, K. C., Breen, E., Ferzoco, S. J., Zinner, M. J., & Ashley, S. A. (2004). Resistance to change in surgical residency: an ethnographic study of work hours reform. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 202(4), 630–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitson, A. L. (2009). The need for systems change: reflections on knowledge translation and organizational change. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(1), 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzmiller, R. R., Anderson, R. A., & McDaniel, R. R. (2010). Making sense of health information technology implementation: A qualitative study protocol. Implementation Science, 5(95), 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lines, R. (2005). How social accounts and participation during change affect organizational learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(3), 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lines, R., Selart, M., Espedal, B., & Johansen, S. T. (2005). The production of trust during organizational change. Journal of Change Management, 5(2), 221–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, S. P., Peón, J. M., & Ordás, C. J. (2006). Human resource management as a determining factor in organizational learning. Management Learning, 37(2), 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K., & Apker, J. (2002). On the front lines of managed care: Professional changes and communicative dilemmas of hospital nurses. Nursing Outlook, 50(4), 154–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K., Joseph, L., & Apker, J. (2000). Strategic ambiguity in the role development process. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28(3), 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, D. J., Kaza, P. L., & Howard, D. (2011). Culture-Change Training: Nursing Facility Staff Perceptions of Culture Change. Geriatric Nursing, 32(6), 400–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D., & Meznar, M. B. (1995). The social construction of organizational learning: conceptual practices and practical issues in the field. Human Relations, 48(7), 727–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, A., Van Den Bossche, P., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Rico, R., & Gil, F. (2013). The influence of change-oriented leadership and psychological safety on team learning in healthcare teams. Journal of Business and Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9315-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloniemi, S., & Collin, K. (2010). Mitä ihmettä on kollektiivinen etnografia? Kokemuksia organisaatiotutkimuksesta [What is collective ethnography? Experiences of organizational research]. In J. Aaltola & R. Valli (Eds.), Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin II [Windows into research methods] (pp. 204–221). Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poell, R. F., & Van der Krogt, F. J. (2010). Individual learning paths of employees in the context of social networks. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning through practice. Models, traditions, orientations and approaches (pp. 197–221). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Portoghese, I., Galletta, M., Battistelli, A., Saiani, A., Penna, M. P., & Allegrini, E. (2012). Change-related expectations and commitment to change of nurses: the role of leadership and communication. Journal of Nursing Management, 20(5), 582–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radley, A., & Chamberlain, K. (2012). The study of the case: conceptualising case study research. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 22(5), 390–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, K., & Courtenay, M. (2008). The role of inter-professional relationships and support for nurse prescribing in acute and chronic pain. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63(3), 276–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2009). Methodological issues in researching institutional change. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (pp. 176–195). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., Näswall, K., Göransson, S., & Öhrming, J. (2008). Employee participation in organizational change: investigating the effects of proactive vs. Reactive implementation of downsizing in swedish hospitals. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung [German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management], 22(2), 111–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R., & Hardy, C. (2011). Reframing resistance to organizational change. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(3), 322–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A. L., & Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Review, 45(2), 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A. L., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2007). Implementing New practices: an empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Science, 53(6), 894–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vähäsantanen, K. (2013). Vocational teachers’ professional agency in the stream of change. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 460. University of Jyväskylä.

  • Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1992). Towards a theory of informal and incidental learning in organizations. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 11(4), 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, P., Boyle, M., Jeffrey, B., & Troman, G. (2000). A research team in ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(1), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Finnish Work Environment Fund (project number 109295).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulla Maija Valleala.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 4 An example of the first and second coding of the data

Appendix 2

Table 5 The coding of the brief summaries concerning participation practices

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valleala, U.M., Herranen, S., Collin, K. et al. Fostering Learning Opportunities Through Employee Participation Amid Organizational Change. Vocations and Learning 8, 1–34 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-014-9121-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-014-9121-0

Keywords

Navigation