Skip to main content
Log in

Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: a review of literature

  • Modern Concepts in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty (TN Board, Section editor)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Discrepancy of leg length is often considered to be a problem after total hip replacement and can adversely affect an otherwise excellent outcome. Furthermore, it has been associated with patient dissatisfaction and remains one of the most common reasons for litigation against the orthopedic community. As a consequence of the need to equalize leg length, several authors have sought to validate methods of minimizing limb length discrepancy based on preoperative planning with preoperative radiological templates or intraoperative methods of measurement. In this article, we present a review of the limb length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty, its implications and several techniques to avoid it. We recommend that a combination of the above mentioned methods will give the best chance for the surgeon to minimise the risk of leg length discrepancy following total hip replacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Ranawat CS, Rao RR, Rodriguez JA, Bhende HS. Correction of limb length inequality during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;6:715–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sayed-Noor AS, Hugo A, Sjoden GO, Wetenberg P. Leg length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of 2 methods of measurement. Int Orthop. 2009;33:189–93.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark CR, Huddleston HD, Schoch EP, Thomas BJ. Leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:38–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Bissett BA, Rothman RH, Hozack WJ. Surgical treatment of limb length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2310–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hofmann AA, Skrzynski MC. Leg length inequality and nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty: a lawyer awaits! Orthopaedics. 2000;23:943–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ranawat CS, Rodriguez JA. Functional leg-length inequality following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 1997;12:359–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sathappan SS, Ginat D, Patel V, Walsh M, Jaffe WL, Di Cesare PE. Effect of anaesthesia type on limb length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2008;23:203–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Turula KB, Frieberg O, Lindholm S, Tallroth K, Vankka E. Leg length inequality after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;202:163–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rand JA, Ilstrup DM. Comparison of Charnley and T-28 total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;180:201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frieberg O. Clinical symptoms and biomechanics of lumbar spine and hip joint in leg length inequality. Spine. 1983;8:643–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mihalko WM, Philips MJ, Krackow KA. Acute sciatic and femoral neuritis following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:589–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosler J, Perka C. The effect of anatomical relationships on kinetic parameters after total hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2000;24:23–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ranawat CS. The pants too short, the leg too long! Orthopaedics. 1999;22:845–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Woo RYG, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1295–306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Amstuz SM, Jinnah RH, Mail L. Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;170:21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Austin MS, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH. Stability and leg length equality in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2003;18:88–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Love BRT, Wright K. Leg length discrepancy after total hip replacement. Proceedings of Australian Orthopaedic association. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65:103. Abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williamson JA, Reckling FW. Limb length discrepancy and related problems following total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;202:135–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Djerf K, Walshtrom O. Total hip replacement comparison between the Mckee-Farrar and Charnley prosthesis in a 5-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1986;105:158–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubash HE, Parvataneni HK. The pants too short, the leg too long: leg length inequality after total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics. 2007;30:764–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. White TO, Dugall TW. Arthroplasty of the hip. Leg length is not important. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:338–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Edeen J, Sharkey PF, Alexander AH. Clinical significance of leg-length inequality after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 1995;24:347–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jasty M, Webster W, Harris W. Management of limb length inequality during total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;333:165–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maloney WJ, Keeney JA. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2004;19:108–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khanduja V, Tek V, Scott G. The effect of neck- retaining femoral implant on leg-length inequality following total hip arthroplasty: a radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:712–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kunkle HM, Carpenter EB. A simple technique for X-ray measurement of limb length discrepancies. J Bone Joint Surg. 1954;36:152–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Woolson ST, James MH, Sawyer A. Results of leg length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplast. 1999;14:159–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Knight JL, Atwater RD. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty: quantitating it’s utility and precision. J Arthroplast. 1992;7:403–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice. New York: Springer; 1979.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Della Valle CJ, Cesare PE. Complications of total hip arthroplasty. Bull N Y Univ Hosp Joint Dis. 2002;16:134–42.

    Google Scholar 

  31. McGee HMJ, Scott JHS. A simple method of obtaining equal leg length in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;194:269–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Woolson ST, Harris WH. A method of intraoperative limb length measurement in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;194:207–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bal BS. A technique for comparison of leg length during total hip replacement. Am J Orthop. 1996;25:61–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Huddleston HD. An accurate method for measuring leg length and hip offset in hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1997;20:331–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Naito M, Ogata K, Asayama I. Intraoperative limb length measurement in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 1999;23:31–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bose WJ. Accurate limb length equalization during total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics. 2000;23:433–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Shiramizu K, Naito M, Shitama T, Nakmura Y, Shitama H. L-shaped calliper for limb length measurement during total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:966–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cuckler JM. Limb length and stability in total hip replacement. Orthopaedics. 2005;28:951–3.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Matsuda K, Shigeru N, Matsuhita T. A simple method to minimize limb length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 1985;77:375–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gonzalez Della Valle A, Slullitel G, Piccaluga F, Salvati EA. The precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cementing and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2005;20:51–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hossain M, Sinha AK. A technique to avoid leg-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Ann R Coll Surg. 2007;89:314–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Takigama I, Mansho I, Yoshiki I, Matsumoto K, Yamaoto T, Shimizu K. Limb-length measurement in total hip arthroplasty using a callipers dual pin retractor. Bull N Y Univ Hosp Joint Dis. 2008;66:107–10.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lakshmanan P, Ahmed SM, Hansford RG, Woodnutt DJ. Achieving the required medial offset and limb length in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;74:49–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Murphy SB, Ecker TM. Evaluation of new length measurement algorithm in hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;463:85–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Desai A, Barkatali B, Dramis A, Board T. A simple intraoperative technique to avoid limb length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Surgeon. 2010;8:119–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sarin VK, Pratt WR, Bradley GW. Accurate femur repositioning is critical during intraoperative total hip arthroplasty length and offset assessment. J Arthroplast. 2005;20:887–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell, et al. The Otto Aufranc award image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:8–22.

  48. Edwards BN, Tulles HS, Noble PC. Contributory factors and etiology of sciatic nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1987;218:136–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pritchett JW. Nerve injury and limb lengthening after hip replacement: treatment by shortening. Clin Orthop. 2004;418:168–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sarangi PP, Bannister GC. Leg length discrepancy after total hip replacement. Hip Int. 1997;7:121–4.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Konyves A, Bannister GC. The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:155–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wylde V, Whitehouse SL, Taylor AH, Pattison GT, Bannister GC, Blom AW. Prevalence and functional impact of patient-received leg length discrepancy after hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2009;33:903–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mizuta I, Fujiwara H, Inoue H. A radiographic study of hip joint alignment after prosthetic hip arthroplasty. Acta Med Okayama. 2002;56:159–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Papadopoulos AX, Tsota I, Megas P. Methods for estimating leg length discrepancy: emphasis to the planning and performance of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Hellenica. 2002;5:321–8.

    Google Scholar 

  55. • Desai AS, Connors L, Board TN. Functional and radiological evaluation of simple intraoperative technique to avoid limb length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2011;22:192–8. Study comparing an intraoperative technique to overcome LLD in THA when comparison with no technique used, showing significant decrease in LLD and better functional outcome when an intraoperative technique used.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Aravind S. Desai, Asterios Dramis, and Tim N. Board declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies on animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aravind S. Desai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desai, A.S., Dramis, A. & Board, T.N. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: a review of literature. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 6, 336–341 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-013-9180-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-013-9180-0

Keywords

Navigation