Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the Multidimensional Structure of Sensory Processing Sensitivity in Turkish Samples

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared alternative models to explore the multidimensionality of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS; Aron and Aron 1997) on two Turkish samples. Using exploratory factor analysis, first study (N = 412) yielded four factors representing diverse domains of sensory processing sensitivity (SPS). Using both traditional confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), a second study (N = 341) confirmed the multidimensionality of the HSPS, and demonstrated that the four-factor ESEM solution (sensitivity to external stimuli, aesthetic sensitivity, harm avoidance, and sensitivity to overstimulation) was superior to the previously reported alternative models. Four factors were also systematically associated with the external validators including big five personality traits. Findings suggested that a multifaceted approach to SPS representing domain-specific sensitivities is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aron, E. N. (2004). Revisiting Jung’s concept of innate sensitiveness. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 49, 337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, E. (2010). Psychotherapy and the highly sensitive person: Improving outcomes for that minority of people who are the majority of clients. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 345–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, E., Aron, A., & Davies, K. M. (2005). Adult shyness: The interaction of temperamental sensitivity and an adverse childhood environment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 181–197.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Ketay, S., Hedden, T., Aron, E. N., Markus, H. R., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2010). Temperament trait of sensory processing sensitivity moderates cultural differences in neural response. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(2–3), 219–226.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. (2012). Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 262–282.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait method analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benham, G. (2006). The highly sensitive person: Stress and physical symptom reports. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1433–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, Bbehavioral activation, and affective responses to reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheek, J. M. (1989). Conquering shyness: The battle anyone can win. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Chen, C., Moyzis, R., Stern, H., He, Q., Li, H., & Dong, Q. (2011). Contributions of dopamine-related genes and environmental factors to highly sensitive personality: A multi-step neuronal system-level approach. PLoS One, 6, e21636.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Development of a model for adult temperament. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 868–888.

  • Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2008). Temperamental sensitivity: Two constructs or one? Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A., Rasche, J., & Schabracq, M. J. (2008). High sensory-processing sensitivity at work. International Journal of Stress Management, 15, 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1981). A model for personality. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Biological dimensions of personality. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality (pp. 244–276). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R., Cooper, A., McOrmond, R., & Tatlow, S. (2004). Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory: Comparing the separable and joint subsystems hypotheses in the predictions of pleasant and unpleasant emotional information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 289–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck's theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246–276). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1991). The neuropsychology of temperament. In J. Strelau & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Explorations in temperament (pp. 105–128). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedden, T., Ketay, S., Aron, A., Markus, H. R., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2008). Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychological Science, 19(1), 12–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S. G., & Bitran, S. (2007). Sensory-processing sensitivity in social anxiety disorder: Relationship to harm avoidance and diagnostic subtypes. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 944–954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagiellowicz, J., Xu, X., Aron, A., Aron, E., Cao, G., Feng, T., & Weng, X. (2011). Sensory processing sensitivity and neural responses to changes in visual scenes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 38–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (1994). Galen’s prophecy: Temperament in human nature. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, C., Mortensen, E. L., & Knudsen, G. M. (2011). Association between sensory processing sensitivity and the serotonin transporter polymorphism 5-HTTLPR short/short genotype. Biological Psychiatry, 69, 152S–153S (supplement for Society of Biological Psychiatry Convention and Annual Meeting, abstract, 510).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liss, M., Mailloux, J., & Erchull, M. J. (2008). The relationship between sensory processing sensitivity, alexithymia, autism, depression, and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 255–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Listou Grimen, H., & Diseth, Å. (2016). Sensory processing sensitivity factors of the highly sensitive person scale and their relationships to personality and subjective health complaints. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 123(3), 637–653.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 471.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, B. (2001). Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 68–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., Ajchenbrenner, M., & Bowles, D. P. (2005). Sensory sensitivity, attachment experiences, and rejection responses among adults with borderline and avoidant features. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 641–658.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L.K. and Muthén, B.O. (1998-2010). Mplus User’s Guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of big five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 173–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, A., & Henson, R. K. (2010). Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şişman, S. (2012). Turkish adaptation of behavioral inhibition system / behavioral activation system scales (BIS/BAS scales): Validity and reliability studies. Studies in Psychology, 32, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolewska, K. A., McCabe, S. B., & Woody, E. Z. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of the highly sensitive person: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “big five”. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1269–1279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobocko, K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2015). Trait sensory-processing sensitivity and subjective well-being: Distinctive associations for different aspects of sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sümer, N. & Sümer, H. C. (2005). Big five personality inventory. Unpublished questionnaire. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded by any institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey

    Gülbin Şengül-İnal & Nebi Sümer

Authors
  1. Gülbin Şengül-İnal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nebi Sümer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gülbin Şengül-İnal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the studies.

Additional information

This research was approved by Middle East Technical University Research Center for Applied Ethics. We express our sincere thanks to Dr. Barbara Maclean for her invaluable comments and recommendations. We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Şengül-İnal, G., Sümer, N. Exploring the Multidimensional Structure of Sensory Processing Sensitivity in Turkish Samples. Curr Psychol 39, 194–206 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9751-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9751-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation