Skip to main content
Log in

Bonuses and investment in intangibles

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional analyses of bonuses have focused on performance measures such as output or profit as the sole determinant of bonus pay plans. However, com-panies now use bonuses for a variety of purposes, including employee recruit-ment and retention and to obtain better outcomes in quality and customer service. These trends suggest that a host of strategic considerations influence company decisions about bonus payouts, ranging from traditional concerns such as employee performance to the company’s reputation among prospective employ-ees and customers, stakeholder influence, and support for technological and organizational change as part of company plans to develop intangible assets. Using data from 2000 ELCS (European Labor Cost Survey), I investigate the determinants of bonus payouts, in particular how a company’s concerns about intangible assets affect its bonus outlays. Consistent with a growing body of evidence, both individual and workplace effects are important in explaining the variation in the incidence of bonus payments. Specifically, the findings suggest that human capital investments are positively related to bonus payments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron. “Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (November 1998): 1055–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benabou, Roland. “Equity and Efficiency in Human Capital Investment: The Local Connection.” Review of Economic Studies 63 (April 1996): 237–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brignall, Stan. “A Contingent Rationale for Cost System Design in Services.” Management Accounting Research8(September 1997): 325–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. National Compensation Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, John and Nicholas Wilson. “Profit Sharing and Productivity: Some Further Evidence.” Economic Journal 99 (June 1989): 550–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, Peter and David Neumark. “Do ‘High-Performance’ Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 54 (July 2001): 737–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cully, Mark. Britain at Work: As Depicted by 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey. New York: Routledge, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, Peter and Michael Piore. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, Saul and N. Wilson. “The Micro-economic Effects of Profit Sharing.” London: Centre for Labor Economics, Paper No. 864, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernie, Sue and David Metcalf. “Participation, Contingent Pay, Representation and Workplace Performance: Evidence from Great Britain.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 33 (September 1995): 379–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzroy, Felix and Kornelius Kraft. “Co-operation, Productivity and Profit Sharing.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (February 1987): 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, David. “The Impact of Bonus Payments on the Average Earnings Index.” Labor Market Trends 110/12 (December 2002): 667–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard and Edward Lazear. “An Economic Analysis of Works Councils.” In J. Rogers et al., eds. Works Councils: Consultation, Representation and Cooperation in Industrial Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor, Oded and Omer Moav. “From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation: Inequality and the Process of Development.” Review of Economic Studies 71 (October 2004): 1001–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichniowski, Casey, Kathryn Shaw, and Giovanna Premushi. “The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines.” American Economic Review 87 (June 1997): 291–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Incomes Data Services. Bonus Schemes. London: IDS HR Study No 742, 2003.

  • Joshi, Heather and Pierella Paci. Unequal Pay for Men and Women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Robert and David Norton. The Balanced Scorecard—Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, Eugene and Edward Lazear, “Peer Pressure and Partnerships.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (August 1992): 801–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, Douglas. Profit Sharing: Does It Make a Difference? Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, Edward. Personnel Economics for Managers. New York: Wiley, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, Baruch and Paul Zarowin. “The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them.” Journal of Accounting Research 37 (Autumn 1999): 353–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDuffie, John. “Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48 (January 1995): 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul and John Roberts. “Complementarities and Fit: Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Change in Manufacturing.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 19 (March-May 1995): 179–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisar, Tahir M. “Is It All in the Timing? The Practice of Bonus Payments in the UK.” Compensation and Benefits Review 35 (September/October 2003): 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, Paul. “How Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 47 (January 1994): 173–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, Michael and Keith Whitfield. “Theories and Evidence on the Growth and Distribution of Profit Sharing and Employee Shareholding Schemes.” Human Systems Management 13 (April 1994): 209–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, John and Eric Van den Steen. Shareholder Interests, Human Capital Investment and Corporate Governance. Stanford, CA: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Research Paper No. 1631,2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, Dave and Norm Smallwood. “Capitalizing on Capabilities.” Harvard Business Review 82 (June 2004): 119–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, Martin and Douglas Kruse. “Profit sharing and Productivity.” In Alan Blinder, ed. Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1990, pp. 95–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Stephen. The Transformation of Work? Skill Flexibility and the Labor Process. London: Unwin, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nisar, T.M. Bonuses and investment in intangibles. J Labor Res 27, 381–395 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-006-1029-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-006-1029-5

Keywords

Navigation