Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners’ Facial Photographs

A Conjoint Analysis Study

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism, symmetry, and coloration in human faces putatively signal information relevant to mate selection and reproduction. Although the independent contributions of these characteristics to judgments of attractiveness are well established, relatively few studies have examined whether individuals prioritize certain features over others. Here, participants (N = 542, 315 female) ranked six sets of facial photographs (3 male, 3 female) by their preference for starting long- and short-term romantic relationships with each person depicted. Composite-based digital transformations were applied such that each image set contained 11 different versions of the same identity. Each photograph in each image set had a unique combination of three traits: sexual dimorphism, symmetry, and color cues to health. Using conjoint analysis to evaluate participants’ ranking decisions, we found that participants prioritized cues to sexual dimorphism over symmetry and color cues to health. Sexual dimorphism was also found to be relatively more important for the evaluation of male faces than for female faces, whereas symmetry and color cues to health were relatively more important for the evaluation of female faces than for male faces. Symmetry and color cues to health were more important for long-term versus short-term evaluations for female faces, but not male faces. Analyses of utility estimates reveal that our data are consistent with research showing that preferences for facial masculinity and femininity in male and female faces vary according to relationship context. These findings are interpreted in the context of previous work examining the influence of these facial attributes on romantic partner perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas, Z. A., & Duchaine, B. (2008). The role of holistic processing in judgments of facial attractiveness. Perception, 37, 1187–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, N., & Welsman, J. (2001). Peak oxygen uptake in relation to growth and maturation in 11- to 17- year-old humans. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 85, 546–551.

  • Baudouin, J. Y., & Tiberghien, G. (2004). Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychologica, 117, 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, L. G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2007). Partner characteristics associated with masculinity, health and maturity in male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1161–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, L. G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., DeBruine, L. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). Facial correlates of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, L. G., Lawson, J. F., & Michael Burt, D. (2009). Testing immunocompetence explanations of male facial masculinity. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charkoudian, N., Stephens, D. P., Pirkle, K. C., Kosiba, W. A., & Johnson, J. M. (1999). Influence of female reproductive hormones on local thermal control of skin blood flow. Journal of Applied Physiology, 87, 1719–1723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B., & Wu, C. H. (1995). “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279.

  • DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L. G., Perrett, D. I., Penton-Voak, I. S., et al. (2006). Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner’s masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1355–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L., & Little, A. C. (2010a). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2405–2410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Smith, F. G., & Little, A. C. (2010b). Are attractive men’s faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 751–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Crawford, J. R., & Welling, L. L. (2011). Further evidence for regional variation in women’s masculinity preferences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 283, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Smith, M. L., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E., et al. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., & Penton-Voak, I. (2002). Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 154–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Matts, P. J. (2006). Visible skin color distribution plays a role in the perception of age, attractiveness, and health in female faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Neave, N., & Seydel, H. (2007). Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 82–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Matts, P. J., D’Emiliano, D., Bunse, L., Weege, B., & Röder, S. (2012). Colour homogeneity and visual perception of age, health and attractiveness of male facial skin. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 26, 1486–1492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Weege, B., Neave, N., Ried, B., & Do Lago, O. C. (2014). Female perceptions of male body movements. In V. A. Weekes-Shackelford & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 297–322). NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Weege, B., Neave, N., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). Integrating body movement into attractiveness research. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139, 603–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, A. C., White, D. D., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Handgrip strength predicts sexual behavior, body morphology, and aggression in male college students. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 423–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Adaptations to ovulation implications for sexual and social behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 312–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1205–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladstone, E., & O’Connor, K. M. (2014). A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125, 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassenberg, A. N., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2010). Sex-dimorphic face shape preference in heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1289–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, A., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (2007). Conjoint analysis as an instrument of market research practice. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann, & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement: methods and applications (pp. 3–30). Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, P. J., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 330–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehman, E., Carpinella, C. M., Johnson, K. L., Leitner, J. B., & Freeman, J. B. (2014). Early processing of gendered facial cues predicts the electoral success of female politicians. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 815–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasienska, G., Lipson, S. F., Ellison, P. T., Thune, I., & Ziomkiewicz, A. (2006). Symmetrical women have higher potential fertility. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, V. S., & Franklin, M. (1993). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammar, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L., Miles, L., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Was that a man? Sex identification as a function of menstrual cycle and masculinity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1185–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2004). When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception, 33, 569–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., DeBruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., Smith, M. L., et al. (2005). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 283–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Watkins, C. D., Welling, L. L., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Reported sexual desire predicts men’s preferences for sexually dimorphic cues in women’s faces. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1281–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, C. F., Randall, D. W., Kendrick, T., & Gutshall, K. A. (2003). Do babyfaced adults receive more help? The (cross-cultural) case of the lost resume. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law Smith, M., Perrett, D. I., Jones, B. C., Cornwell, R. E., Moore, F. R., Feinberg, D. R., et al. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273, 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefevre, C. E., & Perrett, D. I. (2015). Fruit over sunbed: carotenoid skin colouration is found more attractive than melanin colouration. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 284–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. P. (2007). Mate preference necessities in long- and short-term mating: people prioritize in themselves what their mates prioritize in them. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 528–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. P., Valentine, K. A., & Patel, L. (2011). Mate preferences in the U.S. and Singapore: a cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 291–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., & Jones, B. C. (2012). Variation in facial masculinity and symmetry preferences across the menstrual cycle is moderated by relationship context. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, 999–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., & Mannion, H. (2006). Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex individuals changes self-rated attractiveness and face preferences in women. Animal Behaviour, 72, 981–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1095–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Apicella, C. L., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007a). Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 3113–3117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2007b). Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology, 76, 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Waitt, C., Tiddeman, B. P., Feinberg, D. R., Perrett, D. I., et al. (2008). Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: data across culture and species. PloS One, 3, e2106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Connely, J., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2011). Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 862–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Třebický, V., Havlíček, J., Roberts, S. C., & Kleisner, K. (2015). Human perception of fighting ability: facial cues predict winners and losers in mixed martial arts fights. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohrke, F. T., Holloway, B. B., & Woolley, T. W. (2010). Conjoint analysis in entrepreneurship research a review and research agenda. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matts, P. J., & Fink, B. (2010). Chronic sun damage and the perception of age, health and attractiveness. Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, 9, 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matts, P. J., Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Burquest, M. (2007). Color homogeneity and visual perception of age, health, and attractiveness of female facial skin. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57, 977–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKone, E., & Yovel, G. (2009). Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 778–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogilski, J. K., Wade, T. J., & Welling, L. L. M. (2014). Prioritization of potential mates’ history of sexual fidelity during a conjoint ranking task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 884–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P. (1990). Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Animal Behaviour, 40, 1185–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P. (1997). Developmental stability and fitness: a review. The American Naturalist, 149, 916–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P., & Swaddle, J. P. (1997). Asymmetry, developmental stability and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (1997). A meta-analysis of the heritability of developmental stability. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller, A. P., Christe, P., & Lux, E. (1999). Parasitism, host immune function, and sexual selection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 74, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, F. R., Law Smith, M., Taylor, V., & Perrett, D. I. (2011). Sexual dimorphism in the female face is a cue to health and social status but not age. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1068–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhe, L., Oljira, B., Degefu, H., Enquesellassie, F., & Weber, M. W. (1999). Clinical algorithm for malaria during low and high transmission seasons. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 81, 216–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhe, L., Oljira, B., Degefu, H., Jaffar, S., & Weber, M. W. (2000). Evaluation of clinical pallor in the identification and treatment of children with moderate and severe anaemia. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 5, 805–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valentin, D., McKee, K., Huff, D., & Abdi, H. (1998). The perception of face gender: the role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification. Memory and Cognition, 26, 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., & Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Baker, S., Tiddeman, B., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268, 1617–1623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., Tiddeman, B. P., & Perrett, D. I. (2003). Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 264–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., Jacobson, A., & Trivers, R. (2004). Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, D. I., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., Lee, K. J., Rowland, D. A., & Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2007). Contributions of the face and body to overall attractiveness. Animal Behaviour, 73, 937–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piepers, D., & Robbins, R. (2012). A review and clarification of the terms “holistic,” “configural,” and “relational” in the face perception literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., Hickford, C., & Jeffery, L. (2000). Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? British Journal of Psychology, 91, 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., Yoshikawa, S., Clark, A., Lee, K., McKay, R., & Akamatsu, S. (2001). Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: in search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception, 30, 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., Chan, J., Zebrowitz, L. A., & Simmons, L. W. (2003). Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270, S93–S95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossion, B. (2008). Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128, 274–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, D., & Perrett, D. (1995). Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 15, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, C. P., & Todorov, A. (2011). A statistical model of facial attractiveness. Psychological Science, 22, 1183–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samson, N., Fink, B., & Matts, P. J. (2010). Visible skin condition and perception of human facial appearance. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 32, 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheib, J. E. (2001). Context-specific mate choice criteria: Women’s trade-offs in the contexts of long-term and extra-pair mateships. Personal Relationships, 8, 371–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, A., Wallraven, C., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Computational modeling of face recognition based on psychophysical experiments. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63, 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I. M., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2011). The validity of composite photographs for assessing masculinity preferences. Perception, 40, 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I. M., Pound, N., Stephen, I. D., Clark, A. P., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2010). Does masculinity matter? The contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans. PloS One, 5, e13585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D., & Zacharakis, A. (1997). Conjoint analysis: a window of opportunity for entrepreneurship research. In K. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (pp. 203–248). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. G., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Little, A. C. (2009). Interactions between masculinity-femininity and apparent health in face preferences. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 441–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, I. D., Coetzee, V., Law Smith, M., & Perrett, D. I. (2009a). Skin blood perfusion and oxygenation colour affect perceived human health. PloS One, 4, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, I. D., Law Smith, M. J., Stirrat, M. R., & Perrett, D. I. (2009b). Facial skin coloration affects perceived health of human faces. International Journal of Primatology, 30, 845–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, I. D., Coetzee, V., & Perrett, D. I. (2011). Carotenoid and melanin pigment coloration affect perceived human health. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 216–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, I. D., Scott, I. M., Coetzee, V., Pound, N., Perrett, D. I., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2012). Cross-cultural effects of color, but not morphological masculinity, on perceived attractiveness of men’s faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 260–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1996). The evolution of human sexuality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 452–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, M. J. (2002). The biological actions of estrogens on skin. Experimental Dermatology, 11, 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiddeman, B., Burt, M., & Perrett, D. (2001). Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 21, 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic, J., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R., & Welling, L. L. M. (2009). Circum-menopausal effects on women’s judgements of facial attractiveness. Biology Letters, 5, 62–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayneforth, D. (2001). Mate choice trade-offs and women’s preference for physically attractive men. Human Nature, 12, 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Conway, C. A., Smith, M. L., Little, A. C., et al. (2007). Raised salivary testosterone in women is associated with increased attraction to masculine faces. Hormones and Behavior, 52, 156–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2008a). Sex drive is positively associated with women’s preferences for sexual dimorphism in men’s and women’s faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Smith, F. G., Feinberg, D. R., Little, A. C., & Al-Dujaili, E. A. (2008b). Men report stronger attraction to femininity in women’s faces when their testosterone levels are high. Hormones and Behavior, 54, 703–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, R. D., Ozakinci, G., Stephen, I. D., & Perrett, D. I. (2012a). Appealing to vanity: could potential appearance improvement motivate fruit and vegetable consumption? American Journal of Public Health, 102, 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, R. D., Re, D., Xiao, D., Ozakinci, G., & Perrett, D. I. (2012b). You are what you eat: within-subject increases in fruit and vegetable consumption confer beneficial skin-color changes. PloS One, 7, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, D. S. (1986). Effects of introspection on attitude-behavior consistency: analyzing reasons versus focusing on feelings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidel, D. W., Aarde, S. M., & Baig, K. (2005). Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces. Brain and Cognition, 57, 261–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilioli, S., Sell, A. N., Stirrat, M., Jagore, J., Vickerman, W., & Watson, N. V. (2014). Face of a fighter: bizygomatic width as a cue of formidability. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 322–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA

    Justin K. Mogilski & Lisa L. M. Welling

Authors
  1. Justin K. Mogilski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lisa L. M. Welling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin K. Mogilski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mogilski, J.K., Welling, L.L.M. The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners’ Facial Photographs. Hum Nat 28, 53–75 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-016-9277-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-016-9277-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation