Abstract
Using data from Nang Rong, Thailand, this research utilizes a unique research design to analyze the effect of siblings’ characteristics (N = 4,338 sibling pairs) as a determinant of migrant remittances sent as a form of support to aging parents living in rural households. The research advances the study of remittances and intergenerational support by going beyond the prevailing model of remittances, which views these transfers as atomized exchanges between individual migrants and their households. Using characteristics of siblings as determinants of support provision, I find evidence that differences in occupation, gender, and marital status across sibling pairs all have a net effect on support behavior. Underlying these differences is the ability to provide support, competing commitments to family of procreation, and gender norms about care giving.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For more information on the Nang Rong data see the project website (www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/nangrong) or published sources: Entwisle et al. 2007, Rindfuss et al. 2007, Curran et al. 2005.
Consequently, as some earlier migrants are included in these analyses, I did not estimate separate models for the 1994 and the 2000 data.
The baht is the Thai unit of currency; in 2000, at approximately the middle of the year (June 15), 1 USD = 39.07 baht (Federal Reserve 2007). In determining the value of transfers of food, data collection relied on the judgment of respondents.
Money was the most likely form of remittance sent to the household (59% of ego migrants in the sample sent this), followed by food (31%), clothing (25%), household goods (8%), electrical appliances (5%), and vehicles (1%). In analysis that used just monetary remittances, results were similar to those using an overall measure, thus only the overall measure was used in the final analysis.
As having less education was non-significant in the statistical models, this variable was left out of the final analysis.
Overall, 7.54% of egos and 6.26% of siblings were unemployed.
Asset measures include the number of televisions, VCRs, refrigerators, itans (agricultural trucks), bicycles, motorcycles, cars/trucks/pickups, and sewing machines owned by the household. I also include measures for whether the dwelling unit has glass paned windows, the household cooks with electricity or gas, the household owns a large tractor, small tractor, or rice thresher.
The procedure uses all Nang Rong households in the sample to construct the index, while only households included in the analytical sample are included in the analysis. Therefore, the proportion of households in Table 2 does not conform exactly to the expected tertile breakdown. Indeed, wealthier households are slightly under-represented (27 percent are in the top tertile), while middle and bottom tier households are slightly over-represented.
References
Agree, E. M., Biddlecom, A. E., & Valente, T. W. (2005). Intergenerational transfers of resources between older persons and extended Kin in Taiwan and the Philippines. Population Studies, 59(2), 181–195.
Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1063–1093.
Becker, G. S. (1993). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bernheim, B. D., Schleifer, A., & Summers, L. (1985). The strategic bequest motive. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1045–1076.
Brown, R. P. C., & Poirine, B. (2005). A model of migrants’ remittances with human capital investment and intrafamilial transfers. International Migration Review, 39(2), 407–438.
Cai, Q. (2003). Migrant remittances and family ties: a case study of China. International Journal of Population Geography, 9(6), 471–483.
Cameron, L. (2000). The residency decision of elderly Indonesians: a nested logit analysis. Demography, 37(1), 17–27.
Casper, L. M., & Bryson, K. R. (1998). Coresident grandparents and their grandchildren: grandparent maintained families. Population Division Working Paper No 26. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
Chaippori, P. (1992). Collective Models of Household Behavior: The Sharing Rule Approach Paper presented at the International Food Policy Research Institute—World Bank Conference on Intrahousehold Resource Allocation: Policy Issues and Research Methods, Washington, D.C., February.
Chamratrithirong, A., Morgan, P. S., & Rindfuss, R. (1988). Living arrangements and family formation. Social Forces, 66(4), 926–950.
Chamratrithirong, A., Archavanithl, K., Richter, K., Guest, P., Thongthai, V., Boonchalaksi, W., et al. (1995). National migration survey of Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University. IPSR Publication No. 188.
Cowgill, D. O. (1986). Aging around the world. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Cox, D. (1987). Motives for private income transfers. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 508–546.
Cox, D., Eser, Z., & Jimenez, E. (1998). Motives for private transfers over the life cycle: an analytical framework and evidence for Peru. Journal of Development Economics, 55(1), 57–80.
Curran, S. (1995). Gender roles and migration: ‘Good Sons’ vs. Daughters in Rural Thailand.” University of Washington Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology Working Paper No 95–11.
Curran, S., & Saguy, A. C. (2001). Migration and cultural change: a role for gender and social networks. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 2(3), 54–77.
Curran, S., Garip, F., Chung, C. Y., & Tangchonlatip, K. (2005). Gendered migrant social capital: evidence from Thailand. Social Forces, 84(1), 225–255.
De Jong, G. F. (2000). Expectations, gender, and norms in migration decision-making. Population Studies, 54(3), 307–319.
de la Brière, B. S., de Janvry, A., & Lambert, S. (2002). The role of destination, gender, and household composition in explaining remittances: an analysis of Dominican Sierra. Journal of Development Studies, 68(2), 309–328.
Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender and Society, 21(1), 106–127.
England, P. (2005). Emerging theories of care work. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 381–399.
Entwisle, B., Rindfuss, R. R., Faust, K., & Kaneda, T. (2007). Networks and contexts: variation in the structure of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1495–1533.
Federal Reserve. (2007). Thailand Spot Exchange Rate, Bath US$ http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/H10/Hist/dat00_th.txt. Accessed September 20.
Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in States of India. Demography, 38(1), 115–132.
Frankenberg, E., Lillard, L., & Willis, R. (2002). Patterns of intergenerational transfers in Southeast Asia. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 627–641.
Goode, W. J. (1963). World revolution and family pattern. Glencoe: Free Press.
Hashimoto, A. (1991). Living arrangements of the aged in seven developing countries: a preliminary analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 6, 359–381.
Hermalin, A. I., Chang, M., Lin, H., Lee, M., & Ofstedal, M. B. (1990). Patterns of support among the Elderly in Taiwan and their policy implications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Toronto.
Hermalin, A. I., Ofstedal, M. B., & Li, C. (1992). Kin availability of the elderly in Taiwan: Who is available and where are they?. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Population Studies Center.
Hequembourg, A., & Brallier, S. (2005). Gendered stories of parental caregiving among siblings. Journal of Aging Studies, 19, 53–71.
Hoddinot, J. (1994). A model of migration and remittances applied to Western Kenya. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 459–476.
Jiang, L. (1995). Changing kinship structure and its implications for old-age support in Urban and Rural China. Population Studies, 49(1), 127–145.
Kinsella, K., & Philips, D. R. (2005). Global aging: the challenge of success. Population Bulletin, 60(1), 1–42.
Knodel, J., & Saengtienchai, C. (1996). Family care for rural elderly in the midst of rapid social change: the case of Thailand. Social Change, 26(2), 98–115.
Knodel, J., & Chayovan, N. (1997). Family support and living arrangements of Thai Elderly. Asia Pacific Journal, 12(4), 51–68.
Knodel, J., & Saengtienchai, C. (2007). Rural parents with urban children: social and economic implications of migration on the Rural Elderly in Thailand. Population Place and Space, 13, 193–210.
Knodel, J., Chamratrithirong, A., & Debavalya, N. (1987). Thailand’s reproductive revolution: Rapid fertility decline in a third world setting. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Knodel, J., Saengtienchai, C., & Sittitrai, W. (1995). Living arrangements of the elderly in Thailand: views of the populace. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 10, 79–111.
Knodel, J., Friedman, J., Anh, T. S., & Cuong, B. T. (2000). Intergenerational exchanges in vietnam: family size, sex composition, and the location of children. Population Studies, 54(1), 89–104.
Knodel, John., Napaporn Chayovan, Preeya Mithranon, Pattama Amornsirisomboom, Supraporn Arunraksombat. 2005. “Thailand’s Older Population: Social and Economic Support as Assessed in 2002.” PSC Research Report No. 05–571.
Knodel, J., Kespichayawattana, J., Wiwatwanich, S., & Saengtienchai, C. (2007). Migration and Intergenerational Solidarity: Evidence from Rural Thailand. UNFPA Paper in Population Aging No. 2.
Kolenikov, S., & Angeles, G. (2004). The Use of Discrete Data in PCA: Theory, Simulations, and Applications to Socioeconomic Indices. MEASURE/Evaluation Project Working Paper No. WP-04–85. Carolina Population Center: Chapel Hill, NC.
Lee, Y.-J., Parish, W. L., & Willis, R. (1994). Sons, daughters, and intergenerational support in Taiwan. The American Journal of Sociology, 99(4), 1010–1041.
Lillard, L. A., & Willis, R. J. (1997). Motives for intergenerational transfers: evidence from Malaysia. Demography, 34(1), 115–134.
Limanonda, B. (1995). Families in Thailand: beliefs and realities. Journal of Comparative Family Status, 26(1), 67–83.
Limanonda, B., & Kowantanakul, R. (2002). Post nuptial residence in Thailand: Evidence in urban cities in year 2000. Sustainable urbanization and human and environmental security in Asia: final report (pp. 414–435). Tokyo: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research.
Lin, I.-F., Goldman, N., Weinstein, M., Lin, Y.-H., Gorrindo, T., & Seeman, T. (2003). Gender differences in adult children’s support of their parents in Taiwan. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65(1), 184–200.
Martin, L. G. (1988). The ageing of Asia. Journal of Gerontology Series B, 43(1), S99–S113.
Mason, K. O. (1992). Family change and support of the elderly in Asia: what do we know? Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 7(3), 13–32.
Osaki, K. (2003). Migrant remittances in Thailand: economic necessity or social norm? Journal of Population Research, 20(2), 203–222.
Phongpaichit, P. (1993). The labour-market aspects of female migration in Bangkok. In International Migration of Women in Developing Countries: Proceedings of the United Nations Expert Meeting on the Feminization of Internal Migration. New York: United Nations.
Pillemer, K., & Suitor, J. (2006). “Making choices: A within-family study of caregiver selection.” The Gerontologist, 46(4), 439–448.
Piotrowski, M. (2006). The effect of social networks at origin communities on migrant remittances: evidence from Nang Rong District. European Journal of Population, 22(1), 67–94.
Piotrowski, M. (2008a). Intergenerational relations in a context of industrial transition: a study of agricultural labor from migrants in Nang Rong, Thailand. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 23(1), 17–38.
Piotrowski, M. (2008b). Migrant remittances and skipped generation households: incorporating the exchange motive using evidence from Nang Rong, Thailand. Under Review.
Pejaranonda, C., Santipaporn, S., & Guest, P. (1995). Rural-urban migration in Thailand. Trends, patterns, and implications of rural-urban migration in India, Nepal, and Thailand (pp. 171–200). New York: United Nations.
Richter, K., & Havanon, N. (1995). Women’s economic contribution to households in Thailand: Implication for national development and social welfare. Bangkok: Gender Press.
Richter, K. (1996). Living separately as a child-care strategy: implications for women’s work and family in Urban Thailand. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(2), 327–339.
Richter, K., Guest, P., Boonchalaksi, W., Piriyathamwong, N., & Ogena, N. B. (1997). Migration and the rural family: Sources of support and strain in a mobile society. Nakhon Pathom: Institute for Population and Social Research.
Rindfuss, R. R., Kaneda, T., Chattopadhyay, A., & Sethaput, C. (2007). Panel studies and migration. Social Science Research, 36(1), 374–403.
Secondi, G. (1997). Private transfers in Rural China: are families altruistic? Journal of Development Studies, 33(4), 487–511.
Silverstein, M., & Shuzhou, Z. C. (2006a). Intergenerational transfers and living arrangements of older people in Rural China: consequences for psychological well-being. Journals of Gerontology Series B, 61(5), 256–266.
Silverstein, M., Gans, D., & Yang, F. M. (2006b). Intergenerational support to aging parents: the role of norms and needs. Journal of Family Issues, 27(8), 1068–1084.
Stark, O. (1991). The migration of labor. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Stark, O., & Lucas, R. E. B. (1988). Migration, remittances, and the family. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 36, 465–482.
Spitze, G., & Logan, J. (1990). Sons, daughters, and intergenerational social support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(2), 420–430.
Tan, J. E. (2002). Living arrangements of never-married Thai women in a time of rapid social change. Sojourn, 17(1), 24–51.
Taylor, J. E., & Martin, P. (2001). Human capital: migration and rural population change. In B. L. Gardner, & C. R. Gordon (Eds.) 2001. Handbook of Agricultural Economics.
Taylor, J. E., Rozelle, S., & de Brauw, A. (2003). Migration and incomes in source communities: a new economics of migration perspective from China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52, 75–101.
Thornton, A., & Fricke, T. (1987). Social change and the family: comparative perspectives from the West, China, and South Asia. Sociological Forum, 2(4), 746–779.
United Nations. (2002). Report of the second world assembly on ageing: Madrid, 8–12 April 2002. New York: United Nations.
VanWey, L. (2003). Land ownership as a determinant of temporary migration in Nang Rong, Thailand. European Journal of Population, 19, 121–145.
Vanwey, L. K. (2004). Altruistic and contractual remittances between male and female migrants and households in Rural Thailand. Demography, 41(4), 739–756.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151.
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.
Wolf, D. A., Freedman, V., & Soldo, B. J. (1998). The division of family labor: care for elderly parents. Journal of Gerontology Series B, 52B, 102–109.
Zimmer, Z., & Kwong, J. (2003). Family size and support of older adults and Rural China: current effects and future implications. Demography, 40(1), 23–44.
Zimmer, Zachary, Kim Korinek, John Knodel, and Napaporn Chayovan. 2007. Support by Migrants to Their Elderly Parents in Rural Cambodia and Thailand: A Comparative Study. Population Council Working Paper No. 2.
Acknowledgments
An earlier version of this paper was presented during a poster session at the Population Association of America annual meeting, in New Orleans, 2008. I would like to thank Loretta Bass, Ann Beutel, Stephanie Burge, Miyuki Fukashima, Jim Hull, Amy Kroska, Kim Korinek, Craig St. John, and several anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Table S1
ESM 1 (XLS 14825 KB)
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piotrowski, M. Sibling Influences on Migrant Remittances, Evidence from Nang Rong, Thailand. Population Ageing 1, 193–224 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-009-9011-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-009-9011-7