Abstract
In this paper we have considered the restricted three body problem (R3BP) in which the more massive primary is triaxial, the less massive primary and infinitesimal body are oblate spheroids, and are encompassed by a belt of homogenous material points. Analytically and numerically, we have studied the effects of triaxiality of the more massive primary, oblateness of both the less massive primary and infinitesimal body and the gravitational potential generated by the belt on the location of the triangular libration points L 4,5 and their linear stability. L 4,5 do not form equilateral triangles with the primaries in the presence of all or any of the aforementioned perturbations. Due to triaxiality of the more massive primary and oblateness of the infinitesimal body the triangular libration points are seen to move away from the line linking the primaries, whereas they shift closer to the line owing to the oblateness of the less massive primary and the potential from the belt. The range 0 < μ < μ c of stability of the triangular points is reduced in the presence of any of the perturbations, except when considering the potential from the belt the range increases, where μ c is the critical mass ratio. The oblateness of a test particle (of infinitesimal mass) shifts the location of its libration positions away from the primaries and reduces its range of stability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abouelmagd, E. I., Asiri, H. M., Sharaf, M. A. 2013, Meccanica, 48(10), 2479.
Bruno, A. D. 1994, The restricted 3-Body Problem: Plane Periodic Orbits, Walter de Gruyter.
Chenciner, A. 2007, Scholarpedia, 2 (10), 2111.
Damiani, C., Rozelot, J. P., Lefebvre, S., Kilcik, A., Kosovichev, A. G. 2011, J. Atmos. Solar-Terrestrial Phys., 73, 241.
Elshaboury, S. M., Mostafa, A. 2011, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci., 6 (22), 1091.
Greaves, J. S., Holland, W. S., Moriarty-Schieven, G., et al. 1998, Astrophy. J., 506, 133.
Gutzwiller, M. 1998, Rev. Mod. Phys., 70(2) 1–51.
Iorio, L. 2006, Classical Quant. Grav., 23 (17), 5451.
Iorio, L. 2007, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 375 (4), 1311.
Iorio, L. 2009, Space Sci. Rev., 148 (1–4), 363.
Iorio, L. 2010, Cent. Eur. J. Phys., 8 (3), 509–513.
Iorio, L. 2011, Phys. Rev. D, 84 (12), id. 124001.
Iorio, L. 2012, Earth, Moon, Planets, 108 (3–4), 189.
Iorio, L. 2013, Classical Quant. Grav., 30 (19), article id. 195011.
Iorio, L. 2014, Front Astron. Space Sci. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2014.00003.
Iorio, L., Lichtenegger, H.I.M., Ruggiero, M.L., Corda, C. 2011, Astrophys. Space Sci., 331 (2), 351.
Iorio, L., Ruggiero, M.L., Corda, C. 2013, Acta Astronaut., 91, 141.
Ishwar, B. 1997, Celest. Mech., 65, 235.
Ishwar, B. 1998, Rev. Bull. Cal. Math. Soc., 6 (2), 73.
Jain, S., Kumar, A., Bhatnagar, K. B. 2006, Bull. Astr. Soc. India, 34, 211.
Jiang, I. G., Yeh, L. C. 2003, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos, 13, 534.
Jiang, I. G., Yeh, L. C. 2004a, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 355, L29.
Jiang, I. G., Yeh, L. C. 2004b, Astron. J., 128, 923.
Khanna, M., Bhatnagar, K.B. 1999, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 30 (7), 721.
Kushvah, B.S. 2008, Astrophys. Space Sci., 318, 41.
Miyamoto, M., Nagai, R. 1975, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 27, 533.
Moulton, F. R. 1914, An Introduction to Celestial Mechanics, 2nd ed., Dover, New York.
Pitjeva, E. V., Pitjev, N. P. 2014, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 119 (3–4), 237.
Renzetti, G. 2012a, Earth, Moon, Planets, 109 (1–4), 55–59.
Renzetti, G. 2012b, Can. J. Phys., 90 (9), 883.
Renzetti, G. 2013, J. Astrophys. Astron., 34 (4), 341.
Renzetti, G. 2014, Astrophys. Space Sci., 352 (2), 493–496.
Rozelot, J. P., Damiani, C. 2011, Eur. Phys. J. H, 36, 407.
Rozelot, J. P., Fazel, Z. 2013, Solar Phys., 287, 161–170.
Sharma, R. K. 1987, Astophys. Space Sci., 135, 271.
Sharma, R. K., Taqvi, Z. A., Bhatnagar, K. B. 2001a, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 32 (2), 255.
Sharma, R. K., Taqvi, Z. A., Bhatnagar, K. B. 2001b, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 79 (2), 119.
Sharma, R. K., Taqvi, Z. A., Bhatnagar, K. B. 2001c, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 32 (7), 981.
Singh, J. 2013, Astrophys. Space Sci., 346, 41.
Singh, J., Begha, J. M. 2011, Astrophys. Space Sci., 331, 511.
Singh, J., Haruna, S. 2014, Astrophys. Space Sci., 349 (1), 107.
Singh, J., Ishwar, B. 1999, Bull. Astron. Soc. India, 27, 415.
Singh, J., Taura, J. J. 2013, Astrophys. Space Sci., 343 (1), 95.
Singh, J., Taura, J. J. 2014a, J. Astrophys. Astron., 35, 107.
Singh, J., Taura, J. J. 2014b, Astrophys. Space Sci., 352, 461.
Singh, J., Umar, A. 2013, Astrophys. Space Sci., 348, 393.
Smith, D. E., Zuber, M. T., Phillips, R. J. et al. 2012, Science, 336, 214.
Szebehely, V. 1967, Theory of Orbits: The Restricted Problem of Three Bodies, Academic Press, New York.
Szebehely, V.G., Mark, H. 2004, Adventures in Celestial mechanics, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheini, Germany.
Trilling, D. E., Stansberry, J. A., Stapelfeldt, K. R., et al. 2007, Astrophys. J., 658, 1289.
Valtonen, M., Karttunen, H., The Three-Body Problem, Cambridge University Press (2006)
Yan, J., Zhong, Z., Li, F., et al. 2013, Adv. Space Res., 52, 512.
Yeh, L. C., Jiang, I. G. 2006, Astrophys. Space Sci., 306, 189.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, J., Taura, J.J. Effects of Triaxiality, Oblateness and Gravitational Potential from a Belt on the Linear Stability of L 4,5 in the Restricted Three-Body Problem. J Astrophys Astron 35, 729–743 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-014-9308-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-014-9308-7