Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deficiency of mismatch repair genes is less frequently observed in signet ring cell compared with non-signet ring cell gastric cancer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Signet ring cell (SRC) gastric cancer at advanced stage has poor prognosis. While a recent study reported nearly one-third of SRC cases contain tumors with deficient mismatch repair (MMR) genes, other studies in SRC have been inconclusive. To re-analyze the results, we performed immunohistochemical staining of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 proteins in 38 SRC gastric tumors compared with 109 non-SRC (NSRC) tumors from 94 patients. In contrast to the previous study, all SRC gastric tumors normally expressed MMR proteins, whereas 22 of 109 of NSRC (20%) showed deficient MMR proteins. To reinforce our results, we referred to the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) genomic database and found that only 6 (6%) of 99 samples with diffuse gastric tumors showed deficient MMR, whereas 64 (21%) of 304 in intestinal gastric tumors showed deficient MMR. Our results as well as the TCGA database indicated that MMR genes are infrequently inactivated in SRC gastric cancer. These findings indicate that SRC patients may not be the best candidates for immuno-oncology therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SRC:

Signet ring cell

MMR:

Mismatch repair

NSRC:

Non-signet ring cell

TCGA:

The Cancer Genome Atlas

PD-1:

Programmed death 1

PD-L1:

Programmed death 1 ligand 1

dMMR:

Deficient mismatch repair

MSI:

Microsatellite instability

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

MSI-H:

Microsatellite instability-high

MSS:

Microsatellite stable

References

  1. Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hyung WJ, et al. Early gastric carcinoma with signet ring cell histology. Cancer. 2002;94:78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pernot S, et al. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: impact on prognosis and specific therapeutic challenge. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:11428–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Okazaki T, Honjo T. PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: from discovery to clinical application. Int Immunol. 2007;19:813–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yasumasa I,. Shibahara K, Honjo T, Agata Y. Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J. 1992;11:3887–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yarchoan M, Hopkins A, Jaffee EM. Tumor mutational burden and response rate to PD-1 inhibition. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2500–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dung T. Le et al. Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science. 2017;357:409–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iijima Y, et al. Very early response of circulating tumour-derived DNA in plasma predicts efficacy of nivolumab treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2017;86:349–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lord CJ, Ashworth A. The DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Nature. 2012;481:287–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alex D, et al. Evolution of instability at coding and non-coding repeat sequences in human MSI-H colorectal cancers. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:513–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hause RJ, Pritchard CC, Shendure J, Salipante SJ. Classification and characterization of microsatellite instability across 18 cancer types. Nat Med. 2016;22:1342–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gen Tamura, et al. Molecular characterization of undifferentiated-type gastric carcinoma. Lab Investig. 2001;81:593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Seo HM, et al., Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of gastric cancers with the MSI-H phenotype. J Surg Oncol 99, 143–147 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim H, et al. High microsatellite instability predicts good prognosis in intestinal-type gastric cancers. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:585–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marrelli D, et al. Strong prognostic value of microsatellite instability in intestinal type non-cardia gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:943–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shenying J, et al. The PD-1, PD-L1 expression and CD3 + T cell infiltration in relation to outcome in advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma, representing a potential biomarker for immunotherapy. Oncotarget. 2017;8:38850–62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hirotsu Y, et al. Comparison between two amplicon-based sequencing panels of different scales in the detection of somatic mutations associated with gastric cancer. BMC Genom. 2016;17:833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakagomi T, et al. New therapeutic targets for pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas based on their genomic and phylogenetic profiles. Oncotarget. 2018;9:10635–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirotsu Y, et al. Multigene panel analysis identified germline mutations of DNA repair genes in breast and ovarian cancer. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2015;3:459–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao J, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6:pl1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang K, et al. Exome sequencing identifies frequent mutation of ARID1A in molecular subtypes of gastric cancer. Nat Genet. 2011;43:1219–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. N. Cancer Genome Atlas Research. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014;513:202–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. N. Cancer Genome Atlas Research et al. Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma. Nature. 2017;541:169–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang K, et al. Whole-genome sequencing and comprehensive molecular profiling identify new driver mutations in gastric cancer. Nat Genet. 2014;46:573–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cerami E, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:401–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chakravarty D, Gao J, Phillips S, Kundra R, Zhang H, Wang J, Rudolph JE, Yaeger R, Soumerai T, Nissan MH, Chang MT, Chandarlapaty S, Traina TA, Paik PK, Ho AL, Hantash FM, Grupe A,, Baxi SS, Callahan MK, Snyder A, Chi P, Danila DC, Harding JJ, Hellmann MD, Iyer G, Janjigian Y, Kaley T, Levine DA, Lowery M, Omuro A, Postow MA, Rathkopf D, Shoushtari AN, Shukla N, Voss MH, Paraiso E, Zehir A, Berger MF, Taylor BS, Saltz LB, Riely GJ, Ladanyi M, Gounder M, Hyman DM, Baselga J, Sabbatini P, Solit DB, Schultz N. OncoKB: a precision oncology knowledge base. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.17.00011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Y-K Kang et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2461–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shu Y, et al. Prognostic significance of frequent CLDN18-ARHGAP26/6 fusion in gastric signet-ring cell cancer. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Alese OB, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene alteration in signet ring cell carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2015;7:56–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kakiuchi M, et al. Recurrent gain-of-function mutations of RHOA in diffuse-type gastric carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46:583–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Ritsuko Yokouchi and Ms. Naho Sato for data collection of the registry on all the malignant neoplasms at our hospital. We also thank all medical and ancillary staff of the hospital and the patients for consenting to participate. We thank Edanz Group (http://www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Genome Research Project from Yamanashi Prefecture (to M.O. and Y.H.), The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Early-Career Scientists (Grant Number JP18K16292 to Y.H.), Research Grant for Young Scholars (to Y.H.), The YASUDA Medical Foundation (to Y.H.) and The Uehara Memorial Foundation (to Y.H.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yosuke Hirotsu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 32 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hirotsu, Y., Mochizuki, H., Amemiya, K. et al. Deficiency of mismatch repair genes is less frequently observed in signet ring cell compared with non-signet ring cell gastric cancer. Med Oncol 36, 23 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-019-1246-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-019-1246-4

Keywords

Navigation