Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mutation abundance affects the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor readministration in non-small-cell lung cancer with acquired resistance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is no consensus in the salvage treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with acquired resistance to primary epidermal growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Fifty-one consecutive EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with TKI retreatment after acquired resistance were enrolled in this study. The quantitation of mutation abundance was performed by real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR. The correlation between mutation abundance and outcomes of readministrated TKI was analyzed by survival analysis. Patients with high (H) mutation abundance (24/51) had a significantly (log-rank, P < 0.05) longer (5.27–2.53 months) median progression-free survival (PFS), compared with the low (L) abundance group (27/51), whereas the median overall survival showed no difference (21.00–18.20 months, log-rank P = .403) between the two groups. Objective response and disease control rates in group H and group L regarding the second round TKI treatment were 8.3, 70.8 and 0, 48.1 %, respectively. Groupings with different mutation abundances were significantly associated with PFS under multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model [hazard ratio (HR) for group H vs. L, 0.527; P = .036]. Mutation abundance affects the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs readministration in NSCLC with acquired resistance. The quantitative mutation abundance of EGFR may be a potential predictor for selecting optimal patients to readministrate EGFR-TKIs after acquired resistance to primary TKI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:735–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, et al. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:239–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cataldo VD, Gibbons DL, Perez-Soler R, Quintas-Cardama A. Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer with erlotinib or gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:947–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jackman D, Pao W, Riely GJ, et al. Clinical definition of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:357–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yano S, Wang W, Li Q, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor induces gefitinib resistance of lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutations. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9479–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taniguchi K, Okami J, Kodama K, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer and its correlation to the response to gefitinib. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:929–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bai H, Wang Z, Wang Y, et al. Detection and clinical significance of intratumoral EGFR mutational heterogeneity in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oh IJ, Ban HJ, Kim KS, Kim YC. Retreatment of gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who previously controlled to gefitinib: a single-arm, open-label, phase II study. Lung Cancer. 2012;77:121–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaira K, Naito T, Takahashi T, et al. Pooled analysis of the reports of erlotinib after failure of gefitinib for non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2010;68:99–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang LJ, Cai L, Li Z, et al. Relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation and copy number in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2012;31:491–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Azuma K, Okamoto I, Kawahara A, et al. Association of the expression of mutant epidermal growth factor receptor protein as determined with mutation-specific antibodies in non-small cell lung cancer with progression-free survival after gefitinib treatment. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(1):122–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohashi K, Maruvka YE, Michor F, Pao W. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant disease. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1070–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Watanabe S, Tanaka J, Ota T, et al. Clinical responses to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor retreatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients who benefited from prior effective gefitinib therapy: a retrospective analysis. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koizumi T, Agatsuma T, Ikegami K, et al. Prospective study of gefitinib readministration after chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who previously responded to gefitinib. Clin Lung Cancer. 2012;13:458–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Asahina H, Oizumi S, Inoue A, et al. Phase II study of gefitinib readministration in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and previous response to gefitinib. Oncology. 2010;79:423–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:883–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou Q, Zhang XC, Chen ZH, et al. Relative abundance of EGFR mutations predicts benefit from gefitinib treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3316–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ellison G, Donald E, McWalter G, et al. A comparison of ARMS and DNA sequencing for mutation analysis in clinical biopsy samples. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29:132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hata A, Katakami N, Yoshioka H, et al. Erlotinib after gefitinib failure in relapsed non-small cell lung cancer: clinical benefit with optimal patient selection. Lung Cancer. 2011;74:268–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, et al. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2380–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hata A, Katakami N, Yoshioka H et al. Rebiopsy of non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor: Comparison between T790 M mutation-positive and mutation-negative populations. Cancer. doi:10.1002/cncr.28364.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (2012AA02A502).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Long.

Additional information

Ze-Rui Zhao, Jin-Feng Wang and Yong-Bin Lin have contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12032_2013_810_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplementary Fig. 1. Patterns of response among individual patients Group H, high EGFR abundance group; Group L, low EGFR abundance group; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; chemo, chemotherapy; PFS, progression-free survival (TIFF 4887 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, ZR., Wang, JF., Lin, YB. et al. Mutation abundance affects the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor readministration in non-small-cell lung cancer with acquired resistance. Med Oncol 31, 810 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-013-0810-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-013-0810-6

Keywords

Navigation