Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High co-expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 and Snail is associated with poor prognosis after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

VEGFR-1-mediated signaling promotes invasiveness by direct tumor activation in some cancers. However, VEGFR-1 expression and its relationship with clinical features and prognosis in HCC remained unclear. Overexpression of Snail is common in HCC and associated with poorer prognosis. Therefore, expression of VEGFR-1 and Snail was investigated in HCC cell lines and tissue specimens in our study, and special attention was paid to evaluating the role of VEGFR-1 expression in prognosis of HCC. Western blot and immunofluorescence were used to detect expression of VEGFR-1, Snail and MMP-9 in 4 HCC cell lines, respectively. Moreover, expression of these proteins was confirmed on the samples from 95 HCC patients who underwent curative resection using immunohistochemistry. ROC and survival analysis determined the predictive values of parameters and the association with survival. HCC cell lines with a higher VEGFR-1 expression were more invasive. Both VEGFR-1 and Snail expressions were significantly higher in HCC tissues than in non-cancerous tissues. High-expression VEGFR-1 and Snail, associated with adverse clinical features, were independent prognostic factors for RFS and OS (P = 0.023 and P = 0.044, respectively). Positive correlation was found between VEGFR-1 and Snail or MMP-9 (r = 0.418 and r = 0.232, respectively, P < 0.05 for both) in cancerous tissues. The combination of VEGFR-1 and Snail gave a better power to predict patients’ recurrence and death (P < 0.001 for both). High VEGFR-1 expression, distinctively expressed in the cytomembrane of HCC cells, was associated with HCC progression and worse outcome. High co-expression of VEGFR-1 and Snail may be a novel prognostic marker for HCC, especially in recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

VEGFR-1:

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1

TNM:

Tumor-node metastasis

MMP-9:

Matrix metalloproteinase-9

TMA:

Tissue microarray

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

AFP:

α-fetoprotein

EMT:

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition

HBsAg:

Hepatitis B s antigen

OS:

Overall survival

RFS:

Recurrence-free survival

References

  1. Tang ZY, Ye SL, Liu YK, et al. A decade’s studies on metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004;130:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2003;362:1907–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hao K, Luk JM, Lee NP, et al. Predicting prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma after curative surgery with common clinicopathologic parameters. BMC Cancer. 2009;3:389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Qin LX, Tang ZY. Recent progression in predictive biomarkers for metastatic recurrence of human hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of the literature. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004;130:497–513.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fong GH, Klingensmith J, Wood CR, et al. Regulation of Flt-1 expression during mouse embryogenesis suggests a role in the establishment of vascular endothelium. Dev Dyn. 1996;207:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kearney JB, Kappas NC, Ellerstrom C, et al. The VEGF receptor flt-1(VEGFR-1) is a positive modulator of vascular sprout formation and branching morphogenesis. Blood. 2004;103:4527–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wey JS, Fan F, Gray MJ, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 promotes migration and invasion in pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Cancer. 2005;104:427–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang AD, Camp ER, Fan F, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 activation mediates epithelial to Mesenchymal transition in human pancreatic carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:46–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fan F, Wey JS, McCarty MF, et al. Expression and function of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 on human colorectal cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005;24:2647–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bates RC, Goldsmith JD, Bachelder RE, et al. Flt-1 dependent survival characterizes the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of colonic organoids. Curr Biol. 2003;13:1721–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu Y, Hooper AT, Zhong Z, et al. The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR-1) supports growth and survival of human breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:1519–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshiji H, Kuriyama S. ea al. Involvement of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 in murine hepatocellular carcinoma development. J Hepatol. 2004;41:97–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dales JP, Garcia S, Bonnier P, et al. Prognostic significance of VEGF receptors, VEGFR-1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (KDR/Flk-1) in breast carcinoma. Ann Pathol. 2003;23:297–305.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mylona E, Alexandrou P, Giannopoulou I, et al. The prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs)-A and -B and their receptor, VEGFR-1, in invasive breast carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104:557–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanda M, Nomoto S, Nishikawa Y, et al. Correlation of the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor B and its isoforms in hepatocellular carcinoma with clinico-pathological parameters. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:190–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grau Y, Carteret C, Simpson P. Mutations and chromosomal rearrangements affecting the expression of snail, a gene involved in embryonic patterning in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1984;108:347–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Leptin M, Grunewald B. Cell shape changes during gastrulation in Drosophila. Development. 1990;110:73–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang J, Tang Y, Zhu G, et al. Correlation between transcription factor Snail expression and prognosis in adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2010;110:764–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kosaka T, Kikuchi E, Mikami S, et al. Expression of snail in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: prognostic significance and implications for tumor invasion. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:5814–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Blanco MJ, Moreno-Bueno G, Sarrio D, et al. Correlation of Snail expression with histological grade and lymph node status in breast carcinoma. Oncogene. 2002;21:3241–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Häyry V, Salmenkivi K, Arola J, et al. High frequency of SNAIL-expressing cells confirms and predicts metastatic potential of phaeochromocytoma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2009;16:1211–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sugimachi K, Tanaka S, Kameyama T, et al. Transcriptional repressor snail and progression of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:2657–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miyoshi A, Kitajima Y, Kido S, et al. Snail accelerates cancer invasion by upregulating MMP expression and is associated with poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:252–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiao W, Miyazaki K, Kitajima Y. Inverse correlation between E-cadherin and Snail expression in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Br J Cancer. 2002;86:98–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun L, Diamond ME, Ottaviano AJ, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 promotes matrix metalloproteinase-9-mediated oral cancer invasion through snail expression. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6:10–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wanami LS, Chen HY, Peiró S, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A stimulates Snail expression in breast tumor cells: implications for tumor progression. Exp Cell Res. 2008;314:2448–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamamoto H, Itoh F, Adachi Y, et al. Relation of enhanced secretion of active matrix metalloproteinases with tumor spread in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1290–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bloomston M, Zervos EE, Rosemurgy AS II. Matrix metalloproteinases and their role in pancreatic cancer: a review of preclinical studies and clinical trials. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:668–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chu D, Zhao Z, Zhou Y, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 is associated with relapse and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1836-7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Egeblad M, Werb Z. New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:161–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jordà M, Olmeda D, Vinyals A, et al. Upregulation of MMP-9 in MDCK epithelial cell line in response to expression of the Snail transcription factor. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:3371–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hiratsuka S, Nakamura K, Iwai S, et al. MMP-9 induction by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 is involved in lung-specific metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2002;2:289–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang S, Li J, Jiang Y, et al. Programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) suppresses metastatic potential of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28:71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Li N, Yi F, Sundy CM, et al. Expression and actions of HIF prolyl-4-hydroxylase in the rat kidneys. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007;292:F207–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun HC, Tang ZY, Li XM, et al. Microvessel density of hepatocellular carcinoma: its relationship with prognosis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1999;125:419–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Livraghi T. Radiofrequency ablation, PEIT, and TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003;10:67–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shen SQ, Li K, Zhu N, Nakao A. Expression and clinical significance of NET-1 and PCNA in hepatocellular carcinoma. Med Oncol. 2008;25:341–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Jia JB, Zhuang PY, Sun HC, et al. Protein expression profiling of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors identifies subclasses of hepatocellular carcinoma and predicts survival. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009;135:847–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. McCarty KS Jr, Szabo E, Flowers JL, et al. Use of a monoclonal anti-estrogen receptor antibody in the immunohistochemical evaluation of human tumors. Cancer Res. 1986;46:4244s–8s.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Toi M, Bando H, Ogawa T, et al. Significance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/soluble VEGF receptor-1 relationship in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2002;98:14–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ng IO, Poon RT, Lee JM, et al. Microvessel density, vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors Flt-1 and Flk-1/KDR in hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116:838–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Amaoka N, Saio M, Nonaka K, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors is closely related to the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2006;16:3–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. González-Cuevas J, Bueno-Topete M, Armendariz-Borunda J. Urokinase plasminogen activator stimulates function of active forms of stromelysin and gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) in cirrhotic tissue. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:1544–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Miura K, Yoshino R, Hirai Y, et al. Epimorphin, a morphogenic protein, induces proteases in rodent hepatocytes through NF-kappaB. J Hepatol. 2007;47:834–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fukase K, Ohtsuka H, Onogawa T, et al. Bile acids repress E-cadherin through the induction of Snail and increase cancer invasiveness in human hepatobiliary carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:1785–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Miyoshi A, Kitajima Y, Sumi K, et al. Snail and SIP1 increase cancer invasion by upregulating MMP family in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:1265–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Edward C. Mignot for professional linguistic advice. We are also grateful to Professor Ling Gao (Central Laboratory of Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China) for helpful discussion regarding this research area. This study was supported by Shandong Outstanding Youth Science Fund (No. 2007BS03005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chengyong Qin.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 39 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 52 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, T., Zhu, Y., Ren, W. et al. High co-expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 and Snail is associated with poor prognosis after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Med Oncol 29, 2750–2761 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-012-0160-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-012-0160-9

Keywords

Navigation