Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Withdrawal of Technological Life Support Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Prognostication of mortality or severe disability often prompts withdrawal of technological life support in patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We assessed admission factors impacting decisions to withdraw treatment after aSAH.

Methods

Prospectively collected data of aSAH patients admitted to our institution between 1991 and 2009 were reviewed. Patients given comfort care measures were identified, including early withdrawal of treatment (<72 h after admission). Independent predictors of treatment withdrawal were assessed with multivariable analysis.

Results

The study included 1,134 patients, of whom 72 % were female, 58 % white, and 38 % black or African-American. Mean age was 52.5 ± 14.0 years. In-hospital mortality was 18.3 %. Of the 207 patients who died, treatment was withdrawn in 72 (35 %) and comfort measures instituted early in 31 (15 %). Among patients who died, WOLST was associated with older age (63.6 ± 14.2 years, WOLST vs. 55.6 ± 13.7 years, no WOLST, p < 0.001); GCS score <8 (62 % of WOLST vs. 44 % with no WOLST, p = 0.010); HH >3 (72 % of WOLST vs. 53 % with no WOLST, p = 0.008); and hydrocephalus (81 % of WOLST vs. 63 % with no WOLST, p = 0.009). Independent predictors of WOLST were poorer Hunt and Hess grade (AOR 1.520, 95 % CI 1.160–1.992, p = 0.002) and older age (AOR 1.045, 95 % CI 1.022–1.068, p < 0.001) with the latter also impacting early WOLST decisions.

Conclusions

Older age and poor clinical grade on presentation predicted WOLST, and age predicted decisions to withdraw treatment earlier following aSAH. While based on prognosis, and in some cases patient wishes, this may also constitute a self-fulfilling prophecy in others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shea AM, Reed SD, Curtis LH, Alexander MJ, Villani JJ, Schulman KA. Characteristics of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in the United States in 2003. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(6):1131–7 discussion 1137–1138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang J, van Gelder JM. The probability of sudden death from rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(5):1101–5 discussion 1105–1107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith EE, Shobha N, Dai D, et al. A risk score for in-hospital death in patients admitted with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(1):e005207.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Qureshi AI, Suri MF, Nasar A, et al. Trends in hospitalization and mortality for subarachnoid hemorrhage and unruptured aneurysms in the United States. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(1):1–8 discussion 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van den Berg R, Foumani M, Schroder RD, et al. Predictors of outcome in world federation of neurologic surgeons grade V aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(12):2722–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cross DT 3rd, Tirschwell DL, Clark MA, et al. Mortality rates after subarachnoid hemorrhage: variations according to hospital case volume in 18 states. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(5):810–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Naval NS, Chang T, Caserta F, Kowalski RG, Carhuapoma JR, Tamargo RJ. Improved aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage outcomes: a comparison of 2 decades at an academic center. J Crit Care. 2013;28(2):182–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rinkel GJ, Algra A. Long-term outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(4):349–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Heuven AW, Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Validation of a prognostic subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale derived directly from the glasgow coma scale. Stroke. 2008;39(4):1347–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Starke RM, Komotar RJ, Kim GH, et al. Evaluation of a revised glasgow coma score scale in predicting long-term outcome of poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16(7):894–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Becker KJ, Baxter AB, Cohen WA, et al. Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Neurology. 2001;56(6):766–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenberg NF, Liebling SM, Kosteva AR, Maas MB, Prabhakaran S, Naidech AM. Infarct volume predicts delayed recovery in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and severe neurological deficits. Neurocrit Care. 2013. doi:10.1007/s12028-013-9869-3.

  13. Hemphill JC 3rd, White DB. Clinical nihilism in neuroemergencies. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2009;27(1):27–37 vii–viii.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Turgeon AF, Lauzier F, Simard JF, et al. Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study. CMAJ. 2011;183(14):1581–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwarze ML, Bradley CT, Brasel KJ. Surgical “buy-in”: the contractual relationship between surgeons and patients that influences decisions regarding life-supporting therapy. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(3):843–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwarze ML, Redmann AJ, Alexander GC, Brasel KJ. Surgeons expect patients to buy-into postoperative life support preoperatively: results of a national survey. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarze ML, Redmann AJ, Brasel KJ, Alexander GC. The role of surgeon error in withdrawal of postoperative life support. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):10–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Muni S, Engelberg RA, Treece PD, Dotolo D, Curtis JR. The influence of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on end-of-life care in the ICU. Chest. 2011;139(5):1025–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson RW, Newby LK, Granger CB, et al. Differences in level of care at the end of life according to race. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19(4):335–43 quiz 344.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bardach N, Zhao S, Pantilat S, Johnston SC. Adjustment for do-not-resuscitate orders reverses the apparent in-hospital mortality advantage for minorities. Am J Med. 2005;118(4):400–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hemphill JC 3rd, Newman J, Zhao S, Johnston SC. Hospital usage of early do-not-resuscitate orders and outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2004;35(5):1130–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Callahan JG, Fink C, Pitts LH, Luce JM. Withholding and withdrawing of life support from patients with severe head injury. Crit Care Med. 1995;23(9):1567–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cote N, Turgeon AF, Lauzier F, et al. Factors associated with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter cohort study. Neurocrit Care. 2013;18(1):154–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Franklin GA, Cannon RW, Smith JW, Harbrecht BG, Miller FB, Richardson JD. Impact of withdrawal of care and futile care on trauma mortality. Surgery. 2011;150(4):854–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mayer SA, Kossoff SB. Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit. Neurology. 1999;52(8):1602–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Varelas PN, Abdelhak T, Hacein-Bey L. Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies and brain death in the intensive care unit. Semin Neurol. 2008;28(5):726–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Diringer MN, Edwards DF, Aiyagari V, Hollingsworth H. Factors associated with withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in a neurology/neurosurgery intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(9):1792–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Naval NS, Kowalski RG, Chang TR, Caserta F, Carhuapoma JR, Tamargo RJ. The SAH score: a comprehensive communication tool. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.035.

  29. Diringer MN, Bleck TP, Claude Hemphill J 3rd, et al. Critical care management of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(2):211–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosengart AJ, Schultheiss KE, Tolentino J, Macdonald RL. Prognostic factors for outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2007;38(8):2315–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wartenberg KE. Critical care of poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011;17(2):85–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mocco J, Ransom ER, Komotar RJ, et al. Preoperative prediction of long-term outcome in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(3):529–38 discussion 529–538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert G. Kowalski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kowalski, R.G., Chang, T.R., Carhuapoma, J.R. et al. Withdrawal of Technological Life Support Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 19, 269–275 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-013-9929-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-013-9929-8

Keywords

Navigation