Skip to main content
Log in

Restricting ultrasound thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy by nodule size: which tumors are we missing? A population-based study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinicians use nodule size to determine which thyroid nodules should receive cytological evaluation. The American Thyroid Association (ATA) has recommended against cytological evaluation for nodules <1 cm. It is unknown, however, if nodule size can accurately discriminate lesions that will represent tumors with favorable versus unfavorable prognosis. Also, the characteristics of thyroid cancers that would not be diagnosed if a strict 1 cm size cut off is used as the threshold for biopsy of intrathyroidal nodules are not well established. Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a population-based cohort, we identified all thyroid nodules in Olmsted County residents from 2003–2006. To assess the presence of favorable or unfavorable features for each nodule size cutoff, each patient found to have thyroid cancer was risk-stratified using the ATA risk score, which predicts risk of recurrence and persistent disease. Thyroid cancer cases in which a biopsy was done for factors other than thyroid nodule size or suspicious ultrasound features were excluded. We identified 485 thyroid nodules, 46 (9.5 %) harbored thyroid cancer. Of the 46 thyroid cancers, 37 (7.6 %) had ATA low risk; 8 (1.6 %) had intermediate, and only 1 (0.2 %) had an ATA high risk scores. The frequency of thyroid cancer and the distribution of ATA risk scores were similar across tumor sizes. In thyroid nodules of <1 cm, 92 (87 %) were benign, while 13 (13 %) were malignant (11 % ATA low risk, 2 % ATA intermediate risk) without extrathyroid extension, aggressive histology, or distant metastasis. For all thyroid cancer patients, no cases of persistent disease were found after a median follow-up of 7 years. In this population-based study, we showed that high risk thyroid cancers are rare; indeed, in this highly selected cohort of patients, the ATA’s recommendation to avoid cytologic evaluation in thyroid nodules less than 1 cm would not miss any thyroid cancer with high risk features. However, thyroid nodule size at presentation did not accurately discriminate between tumors with favorable versus unfavorable clinicopathologic features. Thus, if further discrimination is desired, for example, to avoid overdiagnosis, features other than size at presentation need to be evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.H. Tan, H. Gharib, Thyroid incidentalomas: management approaches to nonpalpable nodules discovered incidentally on thyroid imaging. Ann. Intern. Med. 126(3), 226–231 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Reiners, K. Wegscheider, H. Schicha, P. Theissen, R. Vaupel, R. Wrbitzky, P.M. Schumm-Draeger, Prevalence of thyroid disorders in the working population of Germany: ultrasonography screening in 96,278 unselected employees. Thyroid 14(11), 926–932 (2004). doi:10.1089/thy.2004.14.926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. J.P. Brito, A.J. Yarur, L.J. Prokop, B. McIver, M.H. Murad, V.M. Montori, Prevalence of thyroid cancer in multinodular goiter versus single nodule: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid 23(4), 449–455 (2013). doi:10.1089/thy.2012.0156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haugen B, Oral communication; http://www.thyroid.org/members-only/member-resources/ata-draft-guidelines/. Accessed 23 Sept 2014

  5. L. Davies, H. Welch, CUrrent thyroid cancer trends in the united states. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. (2014). doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.P. Curado, B. Edwards, H.R. Shin, H. Storm, J. Ferlay, M. Heanue, P. Boyle, Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, vol. IX (IARC, IARC Scientific Publications No. 160, Lyon, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.A. Sosa, J.W. Hanna, K.A. Robinson, R.B. Lanman, Increases in thyroid nodule fine-needle aspirations, operations, and diagnoses of thyroid cancer in the United States. Surgery 154(6), 1420–1426 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.surg.2013.07.006. discussion 1426-1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. J.P. Brito, J.C. Morris, V.M. Montori, Thyroid cancer: zealous imaging has increased detection and treatment of low risk tumours. BMJ 347, f4706 (2013). doi:10.1136/bmj.f4706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. W.A. Rocca, B.P. Yawn, J.L. St Sauver, B.R. Grossardt, L.J. Melton 3rd, History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population. Mayo Clin. Proc. 87(12), 1202–1213 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.08.012

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. J.L. St Sauver, B.R. Grossardt, C.L. Leibson, B.P. Yawn, L.J. Melton 3rd, Generalizability of epidemiological findings and public health decisions: an illustration from the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Mayo Clin. Proc. 87(2), 151–160 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.11.009

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. J.L. St Sauver, B.R. Grossardt, B.P. Yawn, L.J. Melton 3rd, W.A. Rocca, Use of a medical records linkage system to enumerate a dynamic population over time: the Rochester epidemiology project. Am. J. Epidemiol. 173(9), 1059–1068 (2011). doi:10.1093/aje/kwq482

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. I. Sugitani, K. Toda, K. Yamada, N. Yamamoto, M. Ikenaga, Y. Fujimoto, Three distinctly different kinds of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma should be recognized: our treatment strategies and outcomes. World J. Surg. 34(6), 1222–1231 (2010). doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0359-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Ito, A. Miyauchi, H. Inoue, M. Fukushima, M. Kihara, T. Higashiyama, C. Tomoda, Y. Takamura, K. Kobayashi, A. Miya, An observational trial for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in Japanese patients. World J. Surg. 34(1), 28–35 (2010). doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0303-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. J.P. Brito, M.R. Gionfriddo, A. Al Nofal, K.R. Boehmer, A.L. Leppin, C. Reading, M. Callstrom, T.A. Elraiyah, L.J. Prokop, M.N. Stan, M.H. Murad, J.C. Morris, V.M. Montori, The accuracy of thyroid nodule ultrasound to predict thyroid cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(4), 1253–1263 (2014). doi:10.1210/jc.2013-2928

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, which is supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AG034676. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. MRG, SM, and NSO were supported by CTSA Grant Number TL1 TR000137 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS). The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Disclosure

RMT is a consultant for Veracyte.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan P. Brito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brito, J.P., Singh-Ospina, N., Gionfriddo, M.R. et al. Restricting ultrasound thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy by nodule size: which tumors are we missing? A population-based study. Endocrine 51, 499–505 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0713-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0713-8

Keywords

Navigation