Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

99mTc-HYNIC-TOC scintigraphy in evaluation of active Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

A promising radiopharmaceutical 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC (99mTc-HYNIC-Octreotide) can be applied for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with the potential to replace Indium-111 labeled somatostatin analogus. Here we evaluate whether orbital 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC scintigraphy can be used as a Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO) activity parameter to predict the retrobulbar irradiation response.

Methods

Orbital 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC scintigraphy was performed on 14 consecutive patients demonstrating moderated to severe Graves’ ophthalmopathy. The patients were treated with retrobulbar irradiation following the octreoscan and the response to this therapy was assessed at 3 months after the start of treatment. The orbital 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC uptake was calculated to assess the effects of treatment.

Results

Among the 14 GO patients, eight (57.1%) responded to retrobulbar radiotherapy; six (42.9%) showed no change. We compared the eight responders and six non-responders in terms of orbital 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC uptake, using the orbital/occipital ratio. On the 4-h 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC scintigraphy, responders had a higher orbital/occipital uptake ratio than the no-responders (= 0.001). A significant correlation was found between the orbital/occipital ratio and the clinical activity score (CAS) (= 0.034). The Receiving-Operator-Characteristic curve showed the best threshold for discriminating active and inactive disease was 1.40 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 83.3%). In the responders group, all these eight patients had positive scintigraphy. While there were five patients who had negative scintigraphy in the non-responders group.

Conclusion

Orbital 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC scintigraphy can be a useful method for the estimation of disease activity and prediction the response to subsequent radiotherapy in GO patient. And the patients with positive octreoscan were more likely to respond to irradiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Bartalena, A. Pinchera, C. Marcocci, Endocr. Rev. 21, 168–199 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. P.M. van Hagen, E.P. Krenning, D.J. Kwekkeboom, J.C. Reubi, P.J. Anker-Lugtenburg, B. Lowenberg, S.W. Lamberts, Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 24, 91–99 (1994)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Galuska, A. Leovey, Z. Szucs-Farkas, L. Szabados, I. Garai, A. Berta, E. Balazs, J. Varga, E.V. Nagy, Nucl. Med. Commun. 26, 407–414 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Burggasser, I. Hurtl, W. Hauff, J. Lukas, M. Greifeneder, B. Heydari, A. Thaler, A. Wedrich, I. Virgolini, J. Nucl. Med. 44, 1547–1555 (2003)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Parisella, C. D’Alessandria, B. van de Bossche, M. Chianelli, G. Ronga, E. Papini, R. Mikolajczak, C. Letizia, G. De Toma, A. Veneziani, F. Scopinaro, A. Signore, Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 19, 211–217 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Plachcinska, R. Mikolajczak, H.R. Maecke, A. Michalski, K. Rzeszutek, J. Kozak, J. Kusmierek, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 31, 1005–1010 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Decristoforo, S.J. Mather, W. Cholewinski, E. Donnemiller, G. Riccabona, R. Moncayo, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 27, 1318–1325 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S.C. Werner, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 44, 203–204 (1977)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M.P. Mourits, M.F. Prummel, W.M. Wiersinga, L. Koornneef, Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf) 47, 9–14 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Pinchera, W. Wiersinga, D. Glinoer, P. Kendall-Taylor, L. Koornneef, C. Marcocci, H. Schleusener, J. Romaldini, H. Niepominiscze, S. Nagataki, M. Izumi, Y. Inoue, J. Stockigt, J. Wall, F. Greenspan, D. Solomon, J. Garrity, C.A. Gorman, Thyroid 2, 235–236 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Bartalena, C. Marcocci, F. Bogazzi, L. Manetti, M.L. Tanda, E. Dell’Unto, G. Bruno-Bossio, M. Nardi, M.P. Bartolomei, A. Lepri, G. Rossi, E. Martino, A. Pinchera, N. Engl. J. Med. 338, 73–78 (1998)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S.L. Trokel, F.A. Jacobiec, Ophthalmology 88, 553–564 (1981)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M.F. Prummel, W.M. Wiersinga, Thyroid 5, 231–234 (1995)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M.P. Mourits, L. Koorneef, W.M. Wiersinga, M.F. Prummel, A. Berghout, R. Van der Gaag, Br. J. Ophthalmol. 73, 639–644 (1989)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. I. Sillaire, A. Ravel, H. Dalens, J.M. Garcier, L. Boyer, Br. J. Radiol. 84, 139–142 (2003)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Mayer, G. Herdman, C. Burnett, J. Kabala, P. Goddard, M.J. Potts, Eye 15, 313–318 (2001)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M.N. Gerding, M.F. Prummel, W.M. Wiersinga, Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf) 52, 641–646 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. P.T. Postema, E.P. Krenning, R. Wijngaarde, P.P. Kooy, H.Y. Oei, W.A. van den Bosch, J.C. Reubi, W.M. Wiersinga, H. Hooijkaas, T. van der Loos, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 79, 1845–1851 (1994)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Moncayo, I. Baldissera, C. Decristoforo, D. Kendler, E. Donnemiller, Thyroid 7, 21–29 (1997)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M.N. Gerding, F.M. van der Zant, E.A. van Royen, L. Koornneef, E.P. Krenning, W.M. Wiersinga, M.F. Prummel, Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf) 50, 373–379 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. G.E. Krassas, A. Dumas, N. Pontikides, T. Kaltsas, Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf) 42, 571–580 (1995)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Kahaly, R. Gorges, M. Diaz, G. Hommel, A. Bockisch, J. Nucl. Med. 39, 533–536 (1998)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. H.B. Burch, L. Wartofsky, Endocr. Rev. 14, 747–793 (1993)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Marcocci, L. Bartalena, F. Bogazzi, M. Panicucci, A. Pinchera, Acta Endocrinol. (Copenh) 120, 473–478 (1989)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. A.F. Karlsson, K. Wetermark, P.A. Dahlberg, R. Jansson, P. Enoksson, Lancet 2, 691 (1989)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. A.W.C. Kung, C.C. Yau, A. Cheng, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 79, 542–546 (1994)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present study would not have been possible without the participation of the patients and control volunteers. The study is supported by the grants from National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 30370666).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Ju Zhao.

Additional information

Hua Sun and Xu-Feng Jiang contribute equally to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, H., Jiang, XF., Wang, S. et al. 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC scintigraphy in evaluation of active Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO). Endocr 31, 305–310 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-007-0039-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-007-0039-2

Keywords

Navigation