Skip to main content
Log in

Improved Ethanol Production by Mixed Immobilized Cells of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae from Cheese Whey Powder Solution Fermentation

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethanol productions from cheese whey powder (CWP) solution were investigated by using free or immobilized cells of Kluyveromyces marxianus in monocultures or mixed cultures with free or immobilized cells of K. marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. K. marxianus free cells produced 3.8% v/v ethanol in monocultures, while S. cerevisiae immobilized cells produced 5.3% v/v ethanol in mixed cultures. The percentage of theoretical yield was found to be higher in mixed cultures than that in monocultures. The maximum ethanol fermentation efficiency was achieved (79.9% of the theoretical value) using mixed cultures of immobilized cells of K. marxianus and S. cerevisiae. The beads were relatively stable without significant reduction in activity for about eight batches of fermentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlotti, A., Jacob, F., Perrier, J., & Poncet, S. (1991). Biotechnology Letters, 13, 437–440. doi:10.1007/BF01030997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Siso, M. I. G. (1996). Bioresource Technology, 57, 1–11. doi:10.1016/0960-8524(96)00036-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kargi, F., & Ozmihci, S. (2006). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 38, 711–718. doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.11.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozmihci, S., & Kargi, F. (2007). Letters in Applied Microbiology, 44, 602–606. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02132.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Champagne, C. P., & Goulet, J. (1988). Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal, 21, 545–548.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Du, G. C., Hua, Z. Z., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 40, 1686–1691. doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.09.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ken-ichiro, M., Ye, K., & Shimizu, K. (2000). Biochemical Engineering Journal, 6(3), 207–214. doi:10.1016/S1369-703X(00)00089-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mamma, D., Kafllas, D., Fountoukidis, G., Kekos, D., Macris, B. J., & Koukios, E. (1996). Process Biochemistry, 31, 377–381. doi:10.1016/0032-9592(95)00075-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodriguez, H., & Gallardo, R. (1993). Acta Biotechnologica, 13, 141–149. doi:10.1002/abio.370130212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gunasekaran, P., & Kamini, N. R. (1991). World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 7, 551–556. doi:10.1007/BF00368359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozmihci, S., & Kargi, F. (2007). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 41, 876–880. doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.07.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurosawa, H., Nomura, N., & Tanaka, H. (1989). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 33, 716–723. doi:10.1002/bit.260330609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakurai, A., Nishida, Y., Saito, H., & Sakakibara, M. (2000). Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 90, 526–529.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., & Smith, F. (1956). Analytical Chemistry, 8, 350–366. doi:10.1021/ac60111a017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. William, M. B., & Reese, D. (1950). Analytical Chemistry, 22, 1556. doi:10.1021/ac60048a025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Hongjiang Yang for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongguang Xiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, X., Zhou, J. & Xiao, D. Improved Ethanol Production by Mixed Immobilized Cells of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae from Cheese Whey Powder Solution Fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160, 532–538 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8412-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8412-z

Keywords

Navigation