Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A method to optimize assemblability of industrial product in early design phase: from product architecture to assembly sequence

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of modular products is diffused in modern production due to the achievable flexibility and to the required product personalization. Modular products can maximize the efficiency of productive processes if they are structured to be easily configurable during the assembly phase. In this context the present work proposes an approach to optimize the product’s modular architecture aimed to improve manual assemblability. The goal of this method is to assess the product assembly sequence during the early design stage. In particular it improves the conceptual design for assembly approach by taking into account the role of different flows in the modular product structure and the types of interface between modules. A case study regarding the household appliance field is reported and it allows the method results to be shown and to highlight advantages and drawbacks. A relevant improvement in terms of the reduction of assembly time is obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zha X.F., Du H.J., Qiu J.H.: Knowledge-based approach and system for assembly oriented design, Part I: the approach. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 14, 61–75 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Selvaraj P., Radhakrishnan P., Adithan M.: An integrated approach to design for manufacturing and assembly based on reduction of product development time and cost. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 42, 13–29 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boothroyd G., Dewhurst P., Knight W.: Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly. Marcel Dekker, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Fazio T.L., Rhee S.J., Whitney D.E.: Design-specific approach to design for assembly (DFA) for complex mechanical assemblies. IEEE Robotics Autom. 15(5), 869–881 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stone R.B., McAdams D.A.: A product architecture-based conceptual DFA technique. Des. Stud. 25, 301–325 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stone R.B., Wood K.L., Crawford R.H.: A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures. Des. Stud. 21(1), 5–31 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stone R.B., Wood K.L., Crawford R.H.: Using quantitative functional models to develop product architectures. Des. Stud. 21(3), 239–260 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pahl G., Beitz W.: Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. 2nd edn. Springer, (1996)

  9. Ulrich K., Eppinger S.: Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Teng, X., Kong, F., Zhang, J.: Methods supporting product modular design for assembly. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA), vol. 3, pp. 789–793 (2009)

  11. Otto K., Wood K.: Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Prentice Hall, New Jersy (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edwards K.L.: Towards more strategic product design for manufacture and assembly: priorities for concurrent engineering. Mater. Des. 23, 651–656 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki, T. et al.: Assembly reliability evaluation method (AREM). In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning (2001)

  14. Lucas Engineering Systems Ltd, University Of Hull, Design For Manufacture and Assembly Practitioners Manual. Version 10 (1993)

  15. Samy S.N., ElMaraghy H.A.: A model for measuring products assembly complexity. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 23(11), 1015–1027 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Samy, S.N., ElMaraghy, K.H.: Assessment of complexity measures suitable for mechanical assemblies. In: Proceedings on 2nd CIRP Conference on Assembly Technologies and Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada (2008)

  17. Maropoulos P.G., Vichare P., Martin O., Muelaner J., Summers M.D., Kayani A.: Early design verification of complex assembly variability using a hybrid—model based and physical testing—methodology. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 60, 207–210 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dahmus J.B., Gonzalez-Zugasti J.P., Otto K.N.: Modular product architecture. Des. Stud. 22(5), 409–424 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mikkola J.H.: Capturing the degree of modularity embedded in product architectures. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 23, 128–146 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiaoyan, T. Fankai, K., Jiatai, Z.: Methods supporting product modular design for assembly. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (2009)

  21. Azman Y., Nurnasran P., Ruslizam D., Mazni O., Sharifah Lailee S.-A.: Product assembly sequence optimization based on genetic algorithm. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 02(09), 3065–3070 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ulrich, K.: The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24 (1995)

  23. Dini G., Failli F., Lazzerini B., Marcelloni F.: Generation of optimized assembly sequences using genetic algorithms. Manuf. Technol. 48(1), 17–20 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ma, X., Kim, M.: A systematic design for assembly method through the combination of subassemblies in product family. In: Proceedings on International Conference on Smart Manufacturing Application, Gyeonggi-do, Korea (2008)

  25. Barnes, C.J., Dalgleish, G.F., Jared, G.E.M., Swift, K.G., Tate, S.J.: Assembly sequence structures in design for assembly. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning (1997)

  26. Nevis J.L., Whitney D.E.: Concurrent Design of Products and Processes: A Strategy for the Next Generation in Manufacturing. McGraw-Hill, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Owen A.E.: Flexible Assembly Systems: Assembly by Robots and Computer Integrated Systems. Plenum Press, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Su Q.: Computer aided geometric feasible assembly sequence planning and optimizing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 33, 48–57 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, X., Gao, S., Yang, Y., Zhang, S.: Multi-level assembly model for top-down design of mechanical products. Computer-Aided Design (2011)

  30. Demoly F., Yan X.T., Eynard B., Rivest L., Gomes S.: An assembly oriented design framework for product structure engineering and assembly sequence planning. Robotics Comput. Integr. Manuf. 27, 33–46 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen Y., Feng P., He B., Lin Z., Xie Y.: Automated conceptual design of mechanisms using improved morphological matrix. J. Mech. Des. 128(3), 516–527 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Science, Università Politecnica delle Marche, via Brecce Bianche n.1, 60131, Ancona, Italy

    Claudio Favi & Michele Germani

Authors
  1. Claudio Favi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michele Germani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Favi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Favi, C., Germani, M. A method to optimize assemblability of industrial product in early design phase: from product architecture to assembly sequence. Int J Interact Des Manuf 6, 155–169 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-012-0147-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-012-0147-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation