Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

E-Government Attempts in Small Island Developing States: The Rate of Corruption with Virtualization

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, many Small Island Developing State (SIDS) governments have worked to increase openness and transparency of their transactions as a means to enhance efficiency and reduce corruption in their economies. In order to achieve a cost-effective and efficient strategy to implement a transparent government, Information Communication Technologies offer an opportunity of virtualization by deploying e-government services to promote transparency, accountability and consistency in the public sector and to minimize corruption. This paper explores the potential impact of government virtualization by SIDS and against corruption by comparing the corruption perception index (CPI) rates of 15 SIDS countries. The CPI relates to the degree by which corruption is perceived to exist among public officials and politicians by business people and country analysts. In order to reveal the long-term impact of virtual deployment and its consequences on corruption, an in-depth case analysis based on the CPI index rates was conducted on the deployment of the e-government system in Cyprus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. B. (2009). E-government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy, 21, 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atchoarena, D., Graca, P. D. D., & Marquez, J. M. (2008). Strategies for post-primary education in small island developing states (SIDS): Lessons from Cape Verde. Comparative Education, 44(2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchus, M. K. (2008). The education challenges facing small nation states in the increasingly competitive global economy of the twenty-first century. Comparative Education, 44(2), 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backus, P. (2001). E-governance and developing countries. IICD research report, no. 3, pp 1–51.

  • Bertot, J. C. (2003). The multiple dimensions of the digital divide: More than the technology ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’. Government Information Quarterly, 20(2), 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertot, C. J., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, M. J. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, S. (2003). E-government and access to information. Global corruption report 2003. Washington DC: Transparency International.

  • Budden, J. (2005). E-government in the Pacific: an opportunity for regional synergies? Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/undpadm/unpan042336.pdf.

  • Corruption Perceptions Index. (2014). Short methodology note. Transparency international, annual reports for corruptions, CPI 2014. http://www.transparency.org/.

  • Colclough, G., & Tinholt, D. (2009). Smarter, faster, better e-government. 8th E-government benchmark measurement, November 2009 European Commission Directorate.

  • Colclough, G., Tinholt, D., & Lörincz, B. (2009). Digitizing public services in Europe: Putting ambition to action. 9th Benchmark measurement, December 2010, European Commission Directorate.

  • European Commission. (2009). E-government in Malta. European Commission E-government Practice, E-government factsheets, March 2009, Ed.11. http://www.epractice.eu/files/e-governmentCyprus.pdf.

  • European Commission. (2011). E-government in Malta. European Commission E-government Practice, E-government factsheets, December 2012, Ed.15. http://www.epractice.eu/files/e-governmentMalta.pdf.

  • European Commission Report of Cyprus (2011). E-government in Cyprus. E-government factsheets, European Commission E-government Practice, May 2014, Ed.16. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/44/38/9d/eGov%20in%20CY%20%20May%202014%20-%2016.0.pdf.

  • Farrell, G., & Wachholz, C. (2003). Meta-survey on the use of technologies in education in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok: Asia Pacific Regional Bureau for Education, UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaible, E. (2009a). Survey of ICT and education in the Caribbean: Regional trends and analysis. Information for development (Vol I). Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Gaible, E. (2009b). Survey of ICT and education in the Caribbean: Regional trends and analysis, Information for development (Vol II). Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Guild, R., Taufao, S., & Alison, G. L. (2003). Pacific islands and the WSIS. World Summit on the Information Society, Report on conference and side events: Opportunities for the Pacific islands region. Compiled by: International telecommunications Union. SOPAC Miscellaneous Report 500. 16 January, 2003. Retrieved from http://ict.sopac.org/VirLib/MR0500.pdf.

  • Haque, M. S. (2002). E-governance in India: Its impacts on relations among citizens, politicians and public servants. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(2), 231–250. doi:10.1177/0020852302682005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. (2005). E-government as a carrier of context. Journal of Public Policy, 25, 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Montes, E., Gil-Martín, L. M., & Segura, A. (2013). The necessary limits to temptation: The turnkey project. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 529–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imran, A. & Gregor, S. (2005). Strategies for ICT Use in public sector in the least developed countries: A cross-country analysis. In B. Campbell, J. Underwood, & D. Bunker (Eds.), Proceeding of the 16th Australasian conference on information systems (p. 32).

  • Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2003). E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and new directions. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 389–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2004). Social information behavior and the democratic process: Information poverty, normative behavior, and electronic government in the United States. Library & Information Science Research, 26(1), 94–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JIS. (2013). Jamaica Information Service (JIS) 2013, “E-government Initiative Moving ahead”, Story Highlights, 29 April 2013. Accessed October 21, 2014, http://jis.gov.jm/e-government-initiative-moving-ahead/.

  • Koonjul, J. (2004). The special case of small island developing states for sustainability development. Natural Resources Forum, 28(2), 155–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, L. (2001). The global information infrastructure: Empowerment or imperialism? Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mistry, J. J. (2012). The role of e-governance in mitigating corruption. Accounting and the Public Interest, 12(1), 137–159. http://bit.ly/Yn2giX.

  • Mistry, J. J., & Jalal, A. (2012). An empirical analysis of the relationship between e-government and corruption. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 12(1), 145–175. ISSN: 1577-8517. http://dx.doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v12_6.

  • Pathak, R. D., Naz, R., Rahman, M. H., Smith, R. F. I., & Agarwai, K. N. (2009). E-governance to cut corruption in public service delivery: A case study of Fiji. International Journal of Public Administration, 32, 415–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roller, L.-H., & Waverman, L. (2001). Telecommunications infrastructure and economic development: A simultaneous approach. American Economic Review, 91(4), 909–923.

  • Rozendal, R. (2003). Cultural and political factors in the design of ICT projects in developing countries. International Institute for Communication and Development, The Hague, 2003.

  • Scholl, H. J. (2010). Electronic government. Advances in management information systems (AMIS), Volume on Electronic Government. M.E. Sharpe.

  • Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data. International Journal of Public Administration, 31, 298–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. K., & Sahu, R. (2008). Integrating Internet, telephones, and call centers for delivering better quality e-governance to all citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 477–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerate, B. (2006). E-governance developments in European Union cities: Reshaping government’s relationship with citizens. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 19(2), 277–302. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2006.00315.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCAC-United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2003). United Nations Convention Against Corruption. New York: United Nations Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations E-government Survey. (2010). Leveraging e-government at a time of financial and economic crisis, Vol 2, no. 10, United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. ISBN: 9789211231830. https://books.google.com.cy/books?id=euR0yn7BSz8C.

  • United Nations Public Administration Network. (2012). United Nations e-government development database. Retrieved from May 14, 2014, http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/datacenter/countryview.aspx.

  • Von Tigerstrom, B. (2005). Small island developing sates and international trade: Special challenges in global partnership for development. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 6(2), 402–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waheed, M. (2009, July). Tertiary education in small states: Planning in the context of globalization: Keynote address. IIEP Policy Forum, Paris, France.

  • Waverman, L., Meschi, M., & Fuss, M. (2005). The impact of telecoms on economic growth in developing countries. The Vodafone Policy Paper Series, 2(03), 10–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Applying e-government information system for anti-corruption strategy. In Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on management of e-commerce and e-government (pp. 112–115). doi:10.1109/ICMeCG.2009.40.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Information Systems, Girne American University, Via Mersin 10, Kyrenia, Northern Cyprus, Turkey

    Arif Sari

Authors
  1. Arif Sari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arif Sari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sari, A. E-Government Attempts in Small Island Developing States: The Rate of Corruption with Virtualization. Sci Eng Ethics 23, 1673–1688 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9848-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9848-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation