Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Engineering ethics education is a complex field characterized by dynamic topics and diverse students, which results in significant challenges for engineering ethics educators. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a systematic approach to determine what to teach and how to teach in an ethics curriculum. This is a topic that has not been adequately addressed in the engineering ethics literature. This systematic approach provides a method to: (1) develop a context-specific engineering ethics curriculum using the Delphi technique, a process-driven research method; and (2) identify appropriate delivery strategies and instructional strategies using an instructional design model. This approach considers the context-specific needs of different engineering disciplines in ethics education and leverages the collaboration of engineering professors, practicing engineers, engineering graduate students, ethics scholars, and instructional design experts. The proposed approach is most suitable for a department, a discipline/field or a professional society. The approach helps to enhance learning outcomes and to facilitate ethics education curriculum development as part of the regular engineering curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berne, R. W. (2003). Ethics technology and the future: An intergenerational experience in engineering education. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 23(2), 88–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, S.J. (2003). Integrating ethics education at all levels: Ethics as a core competency. Retrieved from National Academy of Engineering 29 Dec 2009 .http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11083.html.

  • Bucciarelli, L. L. (2008). Ethics and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 327–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, J. A., & Frey, W. J. (2003). An effective strategy for integrating ethics across the curriculum in engineering: An ABET 2000 challenge. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(4), 543–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey, N. C. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica, Rand Corporation. Available from: http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/2005/RM5888.pdf. [Accessed 25 July 2010].

  • Dalkey, N. C., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1998). Thinking like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Davis, M. (2006). Engineering ethics, individuals, and organizations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom, J. J., Gorka, S., Kamali, R., Lawson, E., Lunt, B., Miller, J., et al. (2006). The information technology model curriculum. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 343–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskandari, H., Sala-Diakanda, S., Furterer, S., Rabelo, L., Crumton-Young, L., & Williams, K. (2007) Enhancing the undergraduate industrial engineering curriculum: Defining desired characteristics and emerging topics. Education and Training, 49(1), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleddermann, C. B. (2000). Engineering ethics cases for electrical and computer engineering students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(3), 284–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. M., Brigggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber, G. C., & Pionke, C. D. (2006). A team-taught interdisciplinary approach to engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(3), 313–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychology Review, 108, 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws, D. R. (2006). Engineering the Just War: Examination of an approach to teaching engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. (2005). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J., Wetmore, J., Canary, H., & Ellison, K. (2009). Integrating microethics and macroethics in graduate science and engineering education: Developing instructional models, Retrieved February 6, 2010, from American Society for Engineering Education: http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=11085.

  • Hirsch, P. L., Bird, S. J., & D’Avila, M. (2003). Enriching the research experience for undergraduates in biomedical engineering. In Proceedings of the 2003 American society for engineering education annual conference and exposition. Washington, D.C, (pp 283–292) American Society for Engineering Education.

  • Hollander, R. & Arenberg, C. R. (2009). Ethics education and scientific and engineering research: What’s been learned? What should be done? Summary of a workshop. Retrieved February 6, 2010, from National Academy of Engineering: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12695.

  • Hsu, C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi Technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation., 12(10), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, C. W., & Frey, W. (2005). Moral pedagogy and practical ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEEE (2010). IEEE code of ethics. Retrieved January 21, 2010, from IEEE: http://www.ieee.org/portal/pages/iportals/aboutus/ethics/code.html.

  • Iqbal, S., & Pipon-Young, L. (2009). The Delphi method. The Psychologist, 22(7), 598–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kligyte, V., Marcy, R. T., Waples, E. P., Sevier, S. T., Godfrey, E. S., Mumford, M. D., et al. (2008). Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical science and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, R. P. (1973). Curriculum development: Principles and methods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(4), 735–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, J. (1980). The quest for a code of professional ethics: an intellectual and moral confusion. In R. Chalk, M. S. Frankel, & S. B. Chafer (Eds.), AAAS professional ethics project: professional ethics activities in the scientific and engineering societies (pp. 154–159). Washington, D.C.: AAAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, W. T., & Kline, R. (2000). Engineering practices and engineering ethics. Science Technology & Human Values, 25(2), 195–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (2005). Ethics in engineering (4th edn.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, R. E. (2003). “Mind the gaps”: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997–2001. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(4), 517–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSPE (2010). NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. Retrieved January 21, 2010, from National Society of Professional Engineers: http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html.

  • O’Connell, B., & Herkert, J. R. (2004). Engineering ethics and computer ethics: Twins separated at birth? Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8(1), 36–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabins, M. J., Harris, E., Pritchard, M. S. & Lowery, L. L. (2009). Introducing ethics case studies into required undergraduate engineering course. Retrieved November, 15, 2009, from Texas A&M University: http://ethics.tamu.edu/.

  • Reilly, P. L. (1986). Curriculum revision using advisory committees and a modification of the Delphi technique for electronic engineering technology programs. Practicum Paper, Nova University. ED275913.

  • Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1995). Instructional planning: A guide for teachers (2nd edn.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, A., Hacker M., & de Vries, M. J. (2010). Concepts and contexts in engineering and technology education: An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-010-9129-1.

  • Rothwell, W. J., & Kazanas, H. C. (1992). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkinson, B., & Engel, C. (2008). The use of a Delphi consultation to explore the curriculum for sustainable development in engineering. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(4), 298–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1996). The challenger lanch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, V. (2003). Ethics across the curriculum: Preparing engineering and science faculty to introduce ethics into their teaching. Retrieved January 10, 2010, from National Academy of Engineering: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11083.html.

  • Yutrzenka, B. A. (1995). Making a case for training in ethnic and cultural diversity in increasing treatment efficacy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(2), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zandvoort, H., Van Hasselt, G. J., & Bonnet, J. A. B. A. F. (2008). A joint venture model of teaching required courses in ‘ethics and engineering’ to engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Fu, S. A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education. Sci Eng Ethics 18, 339–349 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9249-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9249-8

Keywords

Navigation