Abstract
In the past two decades there has been a succession of advances in the development of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies to be used in the treatment of ACS. Despite optimal dual antiplatelet therapy, nearly 10-12 % of patients still face a risk of death or myocardial infarction one year following PCI. This large residual risk provides the impetus for the development of more effective strategies. Dual pathway regimens that combine antiplatelets (aspirin and a thienopyridine), along with an anticoagulant such as rivaroxaban may prove to be a therapeutic option in patients with ACS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Baigent C et al. ISIS-2: 10 year survival among patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in randomised comparison of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither. The ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. BMJ. 1998;316(7141):1337–43.
Fischman DL et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(8):496–501.
A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet. 1996;348(9038):1329–39.
Harker LA et al. Comparative safety and tolerability of clopidogrel and aspirin: results from CAPRIE. CAPRIE Steering Committee and Investigators. Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events. Drug Saf. 1999;21(4):325–35.
Yusuf S et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(7):494–502.
Sabatine MS et al. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(12):1179–89.
Montalescot G et al. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9665):723–31.
Wiviott SD et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001–15.
Wallentin L et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. New Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045–57.
Rothberg MB et al. Warfarin plus aspirin after myocardial infarction or the acute coronary syndrome: meta-analysis with estimates of risk and benefit. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(4):241–50.
Merlini PA et al. Persistent activation of coagulation mechanism in unstable angina and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1994;90(1):61–8.
Sconce EA et al. The impact of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genetic polymorphism and patient characteristics upon warfarin dose requirements: proposal for a new dosing regimen. Blood. 2005;106(7):2329–33.
Watson, C.P.a.M., Haematology. 2010; Scion.
Cool DE et al. Characterization of human blood coagulation factor XII cDNA. Prediction of the primary structure of factor XII and the tertiary structure of beta-factor XIIa. J Biol Chem. 1985;260(25):13666–76.
Gurbel PA et al. Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2908–13.
Brummel-Ziedins K et al. Thrombin generation in acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease: dependence on plasma factor composition. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6(1):104–10.
Hirsh J. Heparin. New Engl J Med. 1991;324(22):1565–74.
Azar AJ et al. Optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27(6):1349–55.
Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002;324(7329):71–86.
Mega JL et al. Rivaroxaban versus placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46): a randomised, double-blind, phase II trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):29–38.
Alexander JH et al. Apixaban, an oral, direct, selective factor Xa inhibitor, in combination with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: results of the Apixaban for Prevention of Acute Ischemic and Safety Events (APPRAISE) trial. Circulation. 2009;119(22):2877–85.
• Alexander JH et al. Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. New Engl J Med. 2011;365(8):699–708. This trial provides a comparison between apixaban, at a dose of 5 mg twice daily, with placebo, in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy, in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome and at least two additional risk factors for recurrent ischemic events.
Sacco RL et al. Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke. 2006;37(2):577–617.
•• Mega JL et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. New Engl J Med. 2012;366(1):9–19. In the largest phase II study in the history of medicine the use of low dose rivaroxaban in addition to traditional dual antiplatelet therapy is shown to significantly reduce the incidence of CV death, MI, and stroke in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Husted S et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes: a substudy from the prospective randomized PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(5):680–8.
Cavender MA, B.E., Gibson CM, Wiviott S, Murphy S, Amuchastegui S, Oude Ophuis A , van Hessen M, Mega JL, Rivaroxaban Reduces Spontaneous and Large Myocardial Infarctions: Findings from ATLAS ACS 2 - TIMI 51 Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61.
Davies MJ. Anatomic features in victims of sudden coronary death. Coronary artery pathology. Circulation. 1992;85(1 Suppl):I19–24.
Becker EM et al. Effects of rivaroxaban, acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel as monotherapy and in combination in a porcine model of stent thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(12):2470–80.
Scirica BM et al. Vorapaxar for secondary prevention of thrombotic events for patients with previous myocardial infarction: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the TRA 2 degrees P-TIMI 50 trial. Lancet. 2012;380(9850):1317–24.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
ᅟ
Conflict of Interest
William L. Patrick, Charmaine Patel, Raviteja Guddeti, Aarti Narayan, Michael Maddalen, Shankar Kumar, Kalsang Dolma, Vishnu Vardhan Serla, Maheep Sangha, Aditya Govindavarjhulla, Prashanth Saddala, Priyamvada Singh, and Rim Halaby declare that they have no conflict of interest.
C. Michael Gibson has been a consultant/on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Baxter Healthcare, Bayer Corporation, Boston Clinical Research Institute, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Consensus Medical Communications, CSL Behring, Cytori Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo Company, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Exeter Group, Ischemix Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Ortho McNeil, Regado Biosciences, Sanofi-Aventis, St. Jude Medical, and The Medicines Company. He has received grant/research support from Angel Medical Corporation, Atrium Medical Systems, Bayer Corporation, Genentech, Inc., Ikaria, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson Corporation, Lantheus Medical Imaging, Merck & Co., Portola Pharmaceuticals, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi-Aventis, Stealth Peptides, Inc., St. Jude Medical, Volcano Corp., and Walk Vascular. He receives royalties as a contributor from UpToDate in Cardiovascular Medicine and Pocket Medicine. He participates in peer to peer communications with Daiichi Sankyo Company, Eli Lilly and Company, and The Medicines Company. His past research has been supported by Abbott and Schering-Plough Corporation. His has received past royalties as a contributor to Pocket Medicine.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patrick, W.L., Patel, C., Guddeti, R. et al. Is There a Need for “Triple Therapy”? Role of Anticoagulation with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes (ATLAS Study & TRAP Study). Curr Cardiol Rep 15, 411 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-013-0411-1
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-013-0411-1