Abstract
Many biological functions of RNA molecules are related to their pseudoknot structures. It is significant for predicting the structure and function of RNA that learning about the stability and the process of RNA pseudoknot folding and unfolding. The structural features of mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) RNA pseudoknot in different ion concentration, the unfolding process of the RNA pseudoknot, and the two hairpin helices that constitute the RNA pseudoknot were studied with all atom molecule dynamics simulation method in this paper. We found that the higher cation concentration can cause structure of the RNA molecules more stable, and ions played an indispensable role in keeping the structure of RNA molecules stable; the unfolding process of hairpin structure was corresponding to the antiprocess of its folding process. The main pathway of pseudoknot unfolding was that the inner base pair opened first, and then, the two helices, which formed the RNA pseudoknot opened decussately, while the folding pathway of the RNA pseudoknot was a helix folding after formation of the other helix. Therefore, the unfolding process of RNA pseudoknot is different from the antiprocess of its folding process, and the unfolding process of each helix in the RNA pseudoknot is similar to the hairpin structure’s unfolding process, which means that both are the unzipping process.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mattick J S, Igor V, Makunin I V. Non-coding RNA [J]. Human Molecular Genetics, 2006, 15: 17–29.
Kampa D, Cheng J, Kapranov P, et al. Novel RNAs identified from an in-depth analysis of the transcriptome of human chromosomes 21 and 22 [J]. Genome Res, 2004, 14(3): 331–342.
Chen Shijie, Tan Zhijie, Cao Song, et al. The statistical mechanics of RNA folding [J]. Physics, 2006, 35(3): 218–229 (Ch).
Zhao P N, Zhang W B, Chen S J. Predicting secondary structural folding kinetics for nucleic acid [J]. Biophysical Journal, 2010, 98: 1617–1625.
Sosnick T R, Pan T. RNA folding: Models and perspectives [J]. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 2003, 13(3): 309–316.
Treiber D K, Williamson J R. Exposing the kinetic traps in RNA folding [J]. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 1999, 9(3): 339–345.
Cao S, Giedroc D P, Chen S J. Predicting loop-helix tertiary structural contacts in RNA pseudoknots [J]. RNA, 2010, 16: 538–552.
Cao S, Chen S J. Biphasic folding kinetics of RNA pseudoknots and telomerase RNA activity [J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2007, 367: 909–924.
Cao S, Chen S J. Predicting structures and stabilities for H-type pseudoknots with interhelix loops [J]. RNA, 2009, 15: 696–706.
Zhang Y J, Zhang J, Wang W. Atomistic analysis of pseudoknotted RNA unfolding [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, 133(18): 6882–6885.
Thirumalai D, Hyeon C. RNA and protein folding: common themes and variations [J]. Biochemistry, 2005, 44(13): 4957–4970.
Woodson S A. Structure and assembly of group I introns [J]. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 2005, 15(3): 324–330.
Lee T S, Giambasu G M, Harris M E, et al. Characterization of the structure and dynamics of the HDV ribozyme in different stages along the reaction path [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2011, 2: 2538–2543.
Chen S J. RNA folding, conformational statistics, folding kinetics, and ion electrostatics [J]. Annual Review of Biophysics, 2008, 37: 197–214.
Tinoco I Jr, Bustamante C. How RNA folds [J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1999, 293: 271–281.
Chen S J, Dill K A. RNA folding energy landscapes [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2000, 18, 97 (2): 646–651.
Comolli L R, Smirnov I, Xu L, et al. A molecular switch underlies a human telomerase disease [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002, 99(26): 16998–17003.
Theimer C A, Blois C A, Feigon J. Structure of the human telomerase RNA pseudoknot reveals conserved tertiary interactions essential for function [J]. Molecular Cell, 2005, 17(5): 671–682.
Brierley I, Digard P, Inglis S C. Characterization of an efficient coronavirus ribosomal frameshifting signal: requirement for an RNA pseudoknot [J]. Cell, 1989, 57(4): 537–547.
Brierley I, Pennell S, Gilbert R J. Viral RNA pseudoknots: Versatile motifs in gene expression and replication [J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2007, 5(8): 598–610.
Somogyi P, Jenner A J, Brierley I, et al. Ribosomal pausing during translation of an RNA pseudoknot [J]. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1993, 13(11): 6931–6940.
Giedroc D P, Theimer C A, Nixon P L. Structure, stability and function of RNA pseudoknots involved in stimulating ribosomal frameshifting [J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2000, 298(2): 167–185.
Plant E P, Jacobs K L, Harger J W, et al. The 9-A solution: How mRNA pseudoknots promote efficient programmed-1 ribosomal frameshifting [J]: RNA, 2003, 9(2): 168–174.
Staple D W, Butcher S E. Pseudoknots: RNA structures with diverse functions [J]. PLoS Biol, 2005, 3(6): 956–959.
Namy O, Moran S J, Stuart D I, et al. A mechanical explanation of RNA pseudoknot function in programmed ribosomal frameshifting [J]. Nature, 2006, 441(7090): 244–247.
Hansen T M, Reihani S N, Oddershede L B, et al. Correlation between mechanical strength of messenger RNA pseudoknots and ribosomal frameshifting[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104(14): 5830–5835.
Cao S, Chen S J. Predicting ribosomal frameshifting efficiency [J]. Physical Biology, 2008, 5: 016002.
Pennell S, Manktelow E, Flatt A, et al. The stimulatory RNA of the Visna-Maedi retrovirus ribosomal frameshifting signal is an unusual pseudoknot with an interstem element [J]. RNA, 2008, 14(7): 1366–1377.
Cornish P V, Hennig M, Giedroc D P. A loop 2 cytidine-stem 1 minor groove interaction as a positive determinant for pseudoknot-stimulated −1 ribosomal frameshifting [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102(36): 12694–12699.
Theimer C A, Blois C A, Feigon J. Structure of the human telomerase RNA pseudoknot reveals conserved tertiary interactions essential for function[J]. Mol Cell, 2005, 17(5): 671–682.
Chen G, Wen J D, Tinoco I T Jr. Single-molecule mechanical unfolding and folding of a pseudoknot in human telomerase RNA [J]. RNA, 2007, 13: 2175–2188.
Chen G, Chang K Y, Chou M Y, et al. Triplex structures in an RNA pseudoknot enhance mechanical stability and increase efficiency of −1 ribosomal frameshifting [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106: 12706–12711.
Kang H, Tinoco I Jr. A mutant RNA pseudoknot that promotes ribosomal frameshifting in mouse mammary tumor virus [J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 1997, 25(10): 1943–1949.
Liu B, Mathews D H, Turner D H. RNA pseudoknots: folding and finding [J]. F 1000 Biology Reports, 2010, 2: 2–8.
Kang H, Hines J V, Tinoco I Jr. Conformation of a Non-frameshifting RNA pseudoknot from mouse mammary tumor virus [J]. J Mol Biol, 1996, 259: 135–147.
Zhuang Z Y, Jaeger L, Shea J E. Probing the structural hierarchy and energy landscape of an RNA T-loop hairpin [J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2007, 35(20): 6995–7002.
Kale L R, Skeel M, Bhandarkar R, et al. NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics [J]. J Comp Phys, 1999, 151: 283–312.
Yeh I C, Hummer G. Diffusion and electrophoretic mobility of single-stranded RNA from molecular dynamics simulations [J]. Biophys J, 2004, 86(2): 681–689.
Zhang D Q, Konecny R, Baker N A, et al. Electrostatic interaction between RNA and protein capsid in cowpea chlorotic mottle virus simulated by a coarse-grain RNA model and a Monte Carlo approach [J]. Biopolymers, 2004, 75: 325–337.
Yu Tao, Pan Chunxu, Sang Jianping, et al. Comparison in structural stability between chain A and B of CLC-ec1 exchanger by using MD simulation [C]//Proceedings of 2011 4th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI). New York: IEEE Press, 2011: 1825–1828.
Evelyn M, Adam M, Alexander D, et al. CHARMM force field parameters for simulation of reactive intermediates in native and thio-substituted ribozymes [J]. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2007, 28(2): 495–507.
Swarnalatha Y R, Fabrice L, Martin K. DNA polymorphism: A comparison of force fields for nucleic acids [J]. Biophysical Journal, 2003, 84: 1421–1449.
Gong Z, Zhao Y J, Xiao Y. RNA stability under different combinations of amber force fields and solvation models [J]. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics, 2010, 28: 431–441.
Tan Z J, Chen S J. Salt contribution to RNA tertiary structure folding stability [J]. Biophysical Journal, 2011, 101: 176–187.
Tan Z J, Chen S J. Predicting ion binding properties for RNA tertiary structures [J]. Biophysical Journal, 2010, 99: 1565–1576.
Tan Z J, Chen S J. RNA helix stability in mixed Na+/Mg2+ solution [J]. Biophysical Journal, 2007, 92: 3615–3632.
Rivas E, Eddy S R. A dynamic programming algorithm for RNA structure prediction including pseudoknots [J]. J Mol Biol, 1999, 285: 2053–2068.
Xia T, SantaLucia J Jr, Burkard M E, et al. Thermodynamic parameters for an expanded nearest-neighbor model for formation of RNA duplexes with Watson-Crick base pairs [J]. Biochemistry, 1998, 37: 14719–14735.
Zuker M, Stiegler P. Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information [J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 1981, 9: 133–148.
Zuker M. Computer prediction of RNA structure: Methods in enzymology [J]. Methods in Enzymology, 1989, 180: 262–288.
Mathews D H, Sabina J, Zuker M, et al. Expanded Sequence Dependence of Thermodynamic Parameters Improves Prediction of RNA Secondary Structure [J]. J Mol Biol, 1999, 288: 911–940.
Nixon P L, Theimer C A, Giedroc D P. Thermodynamics of stabilization of RNA pseudoknots by cobalt(III) hexaammine [J]. Biopolymers, 1999, 50: 443–458.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10774115) and the Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (20110141110009)
Biography: GUO Yun, female, Master candidate, research direction: RNA molecular dynamics.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, Y., Zhang, W. Molecular dynamics simulation of RNA pseudoknot unfolding pathway. Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 18, 133–141 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-013-0905-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-013-0905-0