Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The 100 most cited publications in cardiac surgery: a bibliometric analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This study is a citation analysis of the top 100 most cited papers in adult cardiac surgery. Bibliometric analyses are viewed as a proxy marker of a paper’s influence and, therefore, an analysis of the most influential papers published in recent decades.

Methods

Impact factor ranking as of 2012 was used to decide which journals to include in our searches. The Thompson Reuters Web of Knowledge was used to search for citations of all papers relevant to cardiac surgery within selected journals.  Journals in the areas of surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, general medicine, anaesthesia, perfusion and pathology were included.

Results

The most frequently cited paper was found to be that of Nashef et al. (Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16(1):9–13, 1999) introducing the EuroSCORE operative risk evaluation system. A number of authors including Alderman, Carpentier and Cox had more than one paper in the top 100.

Conclusion

Despite the potential flaws with bibliometric analysis, and its application to cardiac surgery, there is inherent merit in an analysis of this type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kelly JC, Glynn RW, O’Briain DE, Felle P, McCabe JP (2010) The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(10):1338–1343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eyre-Walker A, Stoletzki N (2013) The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations. PLoS Biol 11(10):e1001675

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baltussen A, Kindler CH (2004) Citation classics in anesthetic journals. Anesth Analg 98(2):443–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubin D, Hafner AW, Arndt KA (1993) Citation classics in clinical dermatologic journals. Citation analysis, biomedical journals, and landmark articles, 1945–1990. Arch Dermatol 129(9):1121–1129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L (2002) One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg 26(9):1099–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Loonen MP, Hage JJ, Kon M (2008) Plastic surgery classics: characteristics of 50 top-cited articles in four plastic surgery journals since 1946. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(5):320e–327e

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Loonen MP, Hage JJ, Kon M (2007) Value of citation numbers and impact factors for analysis of plastic surgery research. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(7):2082–2091 (discussion 92–94, Comparative Study)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bosker BH, Verheyen CC (2006) The international rank order of publications in major clinical orthopaedic journals from 2000 to 2004. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(2):156–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fenton JE, Roy D, Hughes JP, Jones AS (2002) A century of citation classics in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery journals. J Laryngol Otol 116(7):494–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, Gauducheau E, Lemeshow S, Salamon R (1999) European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16(1):9–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR et al (2012) Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 366(18):1686–1695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bigelow WG, Callaghan JC, Hopps JA (1950) General hypothermia for experimental intracardiac surgery; the use of electrophrenic respirations, an artificial pacemaker for cardiac standstill and radio-frequency rewarming in general hypothermia. Ann Surg 132(3):531–539

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363(17):1597–1607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Webb JG, Pasupati S, Humphries K et al (2007) Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 116(7):755–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas M, Schymik G, Walther T et al (2010) Thirty-day results of the SAPIEN aortic bioprosthesis European outcome (SOURCE) registry: a European registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve. Circulation 122(1):62–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tamburino C, Capodanno D, Ramondo A et al (2011) Incidence and predictors of early and late mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 663 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 123(3):299–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lichtenstein SV, Cheung A, Ye J et al (2006) Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in humans: initial clinical experience. Circulation 114(6):591–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Webb JG, Altwegg L, Boone RH et al (2009) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on clinical and valve-related outcomes. Circulation 119(23):3009–3016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease (1996) The bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI) investigators. N Engl J Med 335(4):217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alderman EL, Fisher LD, Litwin P et al (1983) Results of coronary artery surgery in patients with poor left ventricular function (CASS). Circulation 68(4):785–795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alderman EL, Bourassa MG, Cohen LS et al (1990) Ten-year follow-up of survival and myocardial infarction in the randomized coronary artery surgery study. Circulation 82(5):1629–1646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carpentier A (1983) Cardiac valve surgery–the “French correction”. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 86(3):323–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carpentier A, Chauvaud S, Fabiani JN et al (1980) Reconstructive surgery of mitral valve incompetence: ten-year appraisal. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 79(3):338–348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carpentier A, Deloche A, Dauptain J et al (1971) A new reconstructive operation for correction of mitral and tricuspid insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 61(1):1–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cox JL, Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, Kater KM, Lappas DG (1993) Five-year experience with the maze procedure for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 56(4):814–823 (discussion 23–24)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cox JL, Canavan TE, Schuessler RB et al (1991) The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. II. Intraoperative electrophysiologic mapping and description of the electrophysiologic basis of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 101(3):406–426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cox JL, Schuessler RB, D’Agostino HJ et al (1991) The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 101(4):569–583

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM, Ratliff NB, Easley K, Taylor PC (1985) Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 89(2):248–258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Motwani JG, Topol EJ (1998) Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation 97(9):916–931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Koch CG, Li L, Sessler DI et al (2008) Duration of red-cell storage and complications after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 358(12):1229–1239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Mahfood S, McHenry MC, Goormastic M, J. Maxwell Chamberlain memorial paper et al (1990) Sternal wound complications after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: early and late mortality, morbidity, and cost of care. Ann Thorac Surg 49(2):179–186 (discussion 86–87)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cosgrove DM, 3rd, Heric B, Lytle BW et al (1992) Aprotinin therapy for reoperative myocardial revascularization: a placebo-controlled study. Ann Thorac Surg 54(6):1031–1036 (discussion 6–8)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD et al (1999) Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117(5):855–872

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bigelow WG, Lindsay WK, Greenwood WF (1950) Hypothermia; its possible role in cardiac surgery: an investigation of factors governing survival in dogs at low body temperatures. Ann Surg 132(5):849–866

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kirklin JK, Westaby S, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Chenoweth DE, Pacifico AD (1983) Complement and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 86(6):845–857

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bidstrup BP, Royston D, Sapsford RN, Taylor KM (1989) Reduction in blood loss and blood use after cardiopulmonary bypass with high dose aprotinin (Trasylol). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 97(3):364–372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Furnary AP, Zerr KJ, Grunkemeier GL, Starr A (1999) Continuous intravenous insulin infusion reduces the incidence of deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients after cardiac surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 67(2):352–360 (discussion 60–62)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet. 1993;341(8845):573-80

  39. David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;103(4):617-21; discussion 22

  40. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG et al (2003) Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125(4):797–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pepe A, Kurtz MJ (2012) A measure of total research impact independent of time and discipline. PLoS ONE 7(11):e46428

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. van Eck NJ, Waltman L, van Raan AF, Klautz RJ, Peul WC (2013) Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research. PLoS ONE 8(4):e62395

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Winnik S, Raptis DA, Walker JH et al (2012) From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: factors predicting publication and citation. Eur Heart J 33(24):3034–3045

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Davies MK, Hollman A (2002) History of cardiac surgery. Heart 87(6):509

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kolessov VI (1967) Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54(4):535–544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rahimtoola SH (1985) A perspective on the three large multicenter randomized clinical trials of coronary bypass surgery for chronic stable angina. Circulation 72(6 Pt 2):V123–V135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. van de Watering LM, Hermans J, Houbiers JG et al (1998) Beneficial effects of leukocyte depletion of transfused blood on postoperative complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Circulation 97(6):562–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM et al (1996) Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter study of perioperative ischemia research group and the ischemia research and education foundation investigators. N Engl J Med 335(25):1857–1863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. McFalls EO, Ward HB, Moritz TE et al (2004) Coronary-artery revascularization before elective major vascular surgery. N Engl J Med 351(27):2795–2804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R (2002) Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in beating heart against cardioplegic arrest studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet 359(9313):1194–1199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P et al (1994) Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the coronary artery bypass graft surgery trialists collaboration. Lancet 344(8922):563–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ross DN (1967) Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet 2(7523):956–958

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Debakey ME, Henly WS, Cooley DA, Morris GC Jr, Crawford ES, Beall AC Jr (1965) Surgical management of dissecting aneurysms of the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 49:130–149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP et al (2009) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 360(10):961–972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ross DN (1962) Homograft replacement of the aortic valve. Lancet 2(7254):487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G, Jones RH, Ryan TJ, Bennett E et al (2005) Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med 352(21):2174–2183 (Comparative Study)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Furnary AP, Gao G, Grunkemeier GL et al (2003) Continuous insulin infusion reduces mortality in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125(5):1007–1021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Buckberg GD (1979) A proposed “solution” to the cardioplegic controversy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 77(6):803–815

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Chenoweth DE, Cooper SW, Hugli TE, Stewart RW, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW (1981) Complement activation during cardiopulmonary bypass: evidence for generation of C3a and C5a anaphylatoxins. N Engl J Med 304(9):497–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Acar C, Jebara VA, Portoghese M et al (1992) Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 54(4):652–659 (discussion 9–60)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Gardner TJ, Horneffer PJ, Manolio TA, Pearson TA, Gott VL, Baumgartner WA et al (1985) Stroke following coronary artery bypass grafting: a ten-year study. Ann Thorac Surg 40(6):574–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Guiraudon G, Fontaine G, Frank R, Escande G, Etievent P, Cabrol C (1978) Encircling endocardial ventriculotomy: a new surgical treatment for life-threatening ventricular tachycardias resistant to medical treatment following myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg 26(5):438–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B et al (2001) Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 344(6):395–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ferguson TB, Jr, Hammill BG, Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Grover FL (2002) A decade of change–risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990–1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg 73(2):480–489 (discussion 9-90)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Mishra J, Dent C, Tarabishi R et al (2005) Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as a biomarker for acute renal injury after cardiac surgery. Lancet 365(9466):1231–1238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Buffolo E, de Andrade CS, Branco JN, Teles CA, Aguiar LF, Gomes WJ (1996) Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 61(1):63–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Griepp RB, Stinson EB, Hollingsworth JF, Buehler D (1975) Prosthetic replacement of the aortic arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 70(6):1051–1063

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Inoue K, Owaki T, Nakamura T, Kitamura F, Miyamoto N (1984) Clinical application of transvenous mitral commissurotomy by a new balloon catheter. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 87(3):394–402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364(23):2187–2198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R et al (2004) A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 350(1):21–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P et al (1999) Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15(6):816–822 (discussion 22–23)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Hamm CW, Reimers J, Ischinger T, Rupprecht HJ, Berger J, Bleifeld W (1994) A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation (GABI). N Engl J Med 331(16):1037–1043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Calafiore AM, Giammarco GD, Teodori G et al (1996) Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 61(6):1658–1663 (discussion 64–65)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Steingart RM, Packer M, Hamm P et al (1991) Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and ventricular enlargement investigators. N Engl J Med 325(4):226–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Parsonnet V, Dean D, Bernstein AD (1989) A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. Circulation 79(6 Pt 2):I3–I12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B et al (2009) On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 361(19):1827–1837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Kennedy JW, Kaiser GC, Fisher LD et al (1981) Clinical and angiographic predictors of operative mortality from the collaborative study in coronary artery surgery (CASS). Circulation 63(4):793–802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. van Oeveren W, Harder MP, Roozendaal KJ, Eijsman L, Wildevuur CR (1990) Aprotinin protects platelets against the initial effect of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99(5):788–796 (discussion 96–97)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Takaro T, Hultgren HN, Lipton MJ, Detre KM (1976) The VA cooperative randomized study of surgery for coronary arterial occlusive disease II. Subgroup with significant left main lesions. Circulation 54(6 Suppl):III107–III117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Fergusson DA, Hebert PC, Mazer CD et al (2008) A comparison of aprotinin and lysine analogues in high-risk cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 358(22):2319–2331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE et al (2001) Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 344(15):1117–1124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Peterson ED, Shaw LK, DeLong ER, Pryor DB, Califf RM, Mark DB (1997) Racial variation in the use of coronary-revascularization procedures. Are the differences real? Do they matter? N Engl J Med 336(7):480–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Mangano DT (2002) Aspirin and mortality from coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 347(17):1309–1317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Mangano DT, Tudor IC, Dietzel C (2006) The risk associated with aprotinin in cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 354(4):353–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Rickards AF et al (1995) Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery. Lancet 346(8984):1184–1189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Nussmeier NA, Whelton AA, Brown MT et al (2005) Complications of the COX-2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 352(11):1081–1091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Bruins P, te Velthuis H, Yazdanbakhsh AP et al (1997) Activation of the complement system during and after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: postsurgery activation involves C-reactive protein and is associated with postoperative arrhythmia. Circulation 96(10):3542–3548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Cremer J, Martin M, Redl H et al (1996) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 61(6):1714–1720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Bolling SF, Pagani FD, Deeb GM, Bach DS (1998) Intermediate-term outcome of mitral reconstruction in cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115(2):381–386 (discussion 7–8)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Butler J, Rocker GM, Westaby S (1993) Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 55(2):552–559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Lie JT, Pairolero PC, Holley KE, Titus JL (1975) Macroscopic enzyme-mapping verification of large, homogeneous, experimental myocardial infarcts of predictable size and location in dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 69(4):599–605

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Dake MD, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Semba CP, Moore KA, Sakai T (1998) The “first generation” of endovascular stent-grafts for patients with aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116(5):689–703 (discussion 4)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Waldo AL, MacLean WA, Karp RB, Kouchoukos NT, James TN (1977) Entrainment and interruption of atrial flutter with atrial pacing: studies in man following open heart surgery. Circulation 56(5):737–745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Daoud EG, Strickberger SA, Man KC et al (1997) Preoperative amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after heart surgery. N Engl J Med 337(25):1785–1791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Bigger JT, Jr (1997) Prophylactic use of implanted cardiac defibrillators in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias after coronary-artery bypass graft surgery. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patch trial investigators. N Engl J Med 337(22):1569–1575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Zerr KJ, Furnary AP, Grunkemeier GL, Bookin S, Kanhere V, Starr A (1997) Glucose control lowers the risk of wound infection in diabetics after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg 63(2):356–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Almassi GH, Schowalter T, Nicolosi AC, Aggarwal A, Moritz TE, Henderson WG et al (1997) Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a major morbid event? Ann Surg 226(4):501–511 (discussion 11–13)

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. King SB 3rd, Lembo NJ, Weintraub WS et al (1994) A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. Emory angioplasty versus surgery trial (EAST). N Engl J Med 331(16):1044–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Svensson LG, Crawford ES, Hess KR et al (1993) Deep hypothermia with circulatory arrest. Determinants of stroke and early mortality in 656 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106(1):19–28 (discussion 31)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. (1997) Coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for angina: the second randomised intervention treatment of angina (RITA-2) trial. RITA-2 trial participants. Lancet 350(9076):461-468

  101. Hammerschmidt DE, Stroncek DF, Bowers TK et al (1981) Complement activation and neutropenia occurring during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 81(3):370–377

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Fisher LD, Kennedy JW, Davis KB et al (1982) Association of sex, physical size, and operative mortality after coronary artery bypass in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 84(3):334–341

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH et al (1996) Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. Current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation 94(3):390–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. (1997) Influence of diabetes on 5-year mortality and morbidity in a randomized trial comparing CABG and PTCA in patients with multivessel disease: the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI). Circulation 96(6):1761–1769

  105. Paparella D, Yau TM, Young E (2002) Cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation: pathophysiology and treatment. An update. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 21(2):232–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Salzman EW, Weinstein MJ, Weintraub RM et al (1986) Treatment with desmopressin acetate to reduce blood loss after cardiac surgery. A double-blind randomized trial. N Engl J Med 314(22):1402–1406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Hennein HA, Ebba H, Rodriguez JL et al (1994) Relationship of the proinflammatory cytokines to myocardial ischemia and dysfunction after uncomplicated coronary revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 108(4):626–635

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW et al (2001) Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation 104(15):1761–1766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Frazier OH, Rose EA, Macmanus Q et al (1992) Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate 1000 IP left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg 53(6):1080–1090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Shake JG, Gruber PJ, Baumgartner WA (2002) Mesenchymal stem cell implantation in a swine myocardial infarct model: engraftment and functional effects. Ann Thorac Surg 73(6):1919–1925 (discussion 26)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Kennedy JW, Kaiser GC, Fisher LD et al (1980) Multivariate discriminant analysis of the clinical and angiographic predictors of operative mortality from the collaborative study in coronary artery surgery (CASS). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 80(6):876–887

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Murphy GJ, Reeves BC, Rogers CA, Rizvi SI, Culliford L, Angelini GD (2007) Increased mortality, postoperative morbidity, and cost after red blood cell transfusion in patients having cardiac surgery. Circulation 116(22):2544–2552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Shlafer M, Kane PF, Kirsh MM (1982) Superoxide dismutase plus catalase enhances the efficacy of hypothermic cardioplegia to protect the globally ischemic, reperfused heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 83(6):830–839

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St., Dublin 7, Ireland

    K. E. O’Sullivan, J. C. Kelly & J. P. Hurley

  2. Mater Private Hospital, Eccles St., Dublin 7, Ireland

    K. E. O’Sullivan, J. C. Kelly & J. P. Hurley

Authors
  1. K. E. O’Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. C. Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. P. Hurley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. E. O’Sullivan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Sullivan, K.E., Kelly, J.C. & Hurley, J.P. The 100 most cited publications in cardiac surgery: a bibliometric analysis. Ir J Med Sci 184, 91–99 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1193-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1193-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation