Abstract
Since farmers engage in a complex, dynamic process of learning-by-doing, evaluating economic incentives, and assessing risks in deciding whether to adopt agroforestry systems, a multi-pronged research approach is required for a complete analysis of adoption potential and to develop effective technological and institutional interventions. A case study is presented for using multiple approaches to analyse the potential for reforestation and improving livelihoods of small farmers through the adoption of agroforestry systems in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve in Campeche, Mexico. Specifically, the results from a participatory research project are combined with revealed preference analysis of a household survey to analyse past adoption decisions and preferences, identify limitations, test and evaluate alternatives, and evaluate methods for risk reduction. The participatory research trials suggest that continuous intercropping and line cleaning are equally effective for tree growth, while continuous cropping during the first years offers the additional advantage of early returns to investments through crop production. Farmer participation in the research process, planning of production systems, and annual evaluations, assisted farmers and researchers in identifying limitations, testing and evaluating alternatives, and improving the viability and sustainability of systems. The revealed preference analysis provides insights as to which households are most likely to initially adopt agroforestry systems developed through the participatory research trials. In general, households that originated from the Yucatan Peninsula with more education, more experience both in age of the head of household and technical and project experience, higher incomes, and those that had cleared more forestland were more likely to have experimented with agroforestry systems in the past.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amacher, G., Hyde, G.W. and Rafiq, M. (1993), ‘Local adoption of new forestry technologies: an example from Pakistan’s NW frontier province, World Development, 21(3): 445–453.
Ashby, J.A. (1990), Evaluating Technology with Farmers: A Handbook, CIAT Publication Number 187, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, CIAT, Columbia.
Ascher, W. (1995), Communities and Sustainable Forestry in Developing Countries, Institute for Contemporary Studies, San Francisco.
Avila, M. (1995), Agroforestry Research to Develop Sustainable Agriculture in the Forest Buffer Zone of Southeast Mexico, Annual Report, International Council for Research in Agroforestry-Mexico, Chetumal, Mexico.
Bosque Modelo de Calakmul (1994), Calakmul, Mexico Model Forest, pamphlet published by Canadian Ministry of Supply and Services, Québec.
Bosque Modelo de Calakmul (1997), Visión Estratégica 1997–2000, Bosque Modelo para Calakmul, Ecologica Productiva, AC, pamphlet published by Canadian Ministry of Supply and Services, Québec.
Cameron, L. (1999), ‘The importance of learning in the adoption of high-yielding variety seeds’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(1): 83–94.
Casey, J., Mercer, E. and Snook, A. (1999), ‘Evaluating farmer preferences for agroforestry systems: survey instrument design’, in Proceedings of the 1998 Southern Forest Economics Workers Conference, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 153–158.
Feder, G., Just, R.E. and Zilberman, D. (1985), ‘Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2): 255–295.
Fischer A. and Vasseur, L. (2002), ‘Smallholder perceptions of agroforestry projects in Panama’, Agroforestry Systems, 54(2): 103–113.
Foster, A.D. and Rosenzweig, M.R. (1995), ‘Learning by doing and learning from others: human capital and technical change in agriculture’, Journal of Political Economy, 103(6): 1176–1209.
Godoy, R. (1992), ‘Determinants of smallholder commercial tree cultivation’, World Development, 20(5): 713–725.
Haggar, J., Ayala, A., Diaz, B. and Uc Reyes, C. (2001), ‘Participatory design of agroforestry systems: developing farmer participatory research methods in Mexico’, Development in Practice, 11(4): 417–424.
Haggar, J.P., Rheingans, R., Aroyo, P. and Alvarado, B. (2003), ‘Benefits and Costs of intercropping reforestation in the Atlantic lowlands of Costa Rica’, New Forests, 25: 41–48.
Hayami, Y. and Ruttan, V.W. (1985), Agricultural Development: An International Perspective, 2nd edition, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Maddala, G.S. (1983), Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics, Economic Society Monographs No. 3, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
Mercer, D.E. and Pattanayak, S. (2003), ‘Agroforestry Adoption by Smallholders’, in Forests in a Market Economy, K. Abt and E. Sills (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 283–300.
Negreros, C.P. (1997), Evaluación del sostenibilidad del manejo forestal de la Organización de Ejidos Productores Forestales de la Zona Maya, Quintana Roo, Reporte a la Fundación Rockefeller, Mexico City.
Pattanayak, S.K., Mercer, D.E., Sills, E.O. and Yang, J. (2003), ‘Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies’, Agroforestry Systems, 57: 173–186.
Pender, J. and Kerr, J. (1998), ‘Determinants of farmers’ indigenous soil and water conservation investments in semi-arid India’, Agricultural Economics, 19: 113–125.
Scherr, S.J. (1995), ‘Economic factors in farmer adoption of agroforestry: patterns observed in Western Kenya’, World Development, 23(5): 787–804.
SEMARNAP (2000), Programa de Manejo de la Reserva de Biosfera de Calakmul, Instituto Nacional de Ecologia, Ciudad de Mexico, Instituto Nacional de Ecologia y Secretaria de Medio Ambiente, Mexico City.
Smid, C. (1999), ‘Reforestation of degraded agricultural land with native tree species in the buffer zone of the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Campeche Mexico’, Master’ thesis for the Nicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Snook, A. (1996), Annual Report, International Centre for Research in Agroforestry — Mexico, Chetumal, Quintana Roo, Mexico City.
Snook, A. (2004), ‘En busca de sistemas agroforestales viables; resultados y experiencias en Calakmul y la Zona Maya’, in Uso conservación y cambio en los bosques de Quintana Roo, Natalia Armijo y Carlos Llorens, cords, Universidad de Quintana Roo, Quintana Roo, México, pp. 131–158.
Snook, A. and Zapata, G. (1998), ‘Tree cultivation in Calakmul, Mexico: Alternatives for reforestation’, Agroforestry Today, 10: 15–18.
Sosa, L. (1997), ‘Evaluación de Plantaciones de Cedro y Caoba en Sistemas Agroforestales en el Area de Bosque Modelo, Reserva de la Biosfera de Calakmul’, Licenciatura Thesis, Universidad de Chapingo, Chapingo, Mexico.
Thacher, T., Lee, D.R. and Schelhas, J.W. (1997), ‘Farmer participation in reforestation incentive programs in Costa Rica’, Agroforestry Systems, 35(3): 269–289.
Utting, P. (1993), Trees, People and Power: Social Dimensions of Forestation and Forest Protection in Central America, Earthscan, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mercer, D.E., Haggar, J., Snook, A. et al. Agroforestry adoption in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Campeche, Mexico. Small-scale Forestry 4, 163–183 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0011-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0011-z