Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental and numerical investigation on the dynamic response of pile group in liquefying ground

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response of pile foundation in liquefiable sand reinforced by densification techniques remains a very complex problem during strong earthquakes. A shake-table experiment was carried out to investigate the behavior of a reinforced concrete low-cap pile group embedded in this type of ground. In this study, a three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) analysis of the experiment was conducted. The computed response of the soil-pile system was in reasonable agreement with the experimental results, highlighting some key characteristics. Then, a parametric study was performed to explore the influence of pile spacing, pile stiffness (EI), superstructure mass, sand permeability, and shaking characteristics of input motion on the behavior of the pile. The investigation demonstrated a stiffening behavior appearing in the liquefied mediumdense sand, and the pile group effect seemed negligible. Furthermore, the kinematic effect was closely connected with both EI and sand permeability. Nevertheless, the inertial effect was strongly influenced by the superstructure mass. Meanwhile, high frequency and large amplitude of the input motion could produced greater the pile’s moments. It is estimated that this case study could further enhance the current understanding of the behavior of low-cap pile foundations in liquefied dense sand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adalier K, Elgamal A, Meneses J and Baez J (2003), “Stone Columns as Liquefaction Countermeasure in Non-Plastic Silty Soils,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 23(7):571–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford SA, Juirnarongrit T, Sugano T and Hamada M (2006), “Soil–pile Response to Blast-induced Lateral Spreading. I: Field Test,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132(2): 152–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badoni D and Makris N (1996), “Nonlinear Response of Single Piles under Lateral Inertial and Seismic Loads,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 15(1): 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biot MA (1955), “Theory of Elasticity and Consolidation for a Porous Anisotropic Solid,” Journal of Applied Physics, 26(2): 182–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Curras CJ, Kutter BL, Wilson DW and Abghari A (1999), “Seismic Soil-pile-structure Interaction Experiments and Analyses,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125(9): 750–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenberg SJ, Boulanger RW, Kutter BL and Chang D (2007), “Liquefaction-induced Softening of Load Transfer Between Pile Groups and Laterally Spreading Crusts,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133(1): 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chae K, Ugai K and Wakai A (2004), “Lateral Resistance of Short Single Piles and Pile Groups Located near Slopes,” International Journal of Geomechanics, 4(2): 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan AH-C (1988), “A Unified Finite Element Solution to Static and Dynamic Problems of Geomechanics,” PhD Thesis, University College of Swansea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau K, Shen C and Guo X (2009), “Nonlinear Seismic Soil–pile–structure Interactions: Shaking Table Tests and Fem Analyses,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(2): 300–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z and Jeremic B (2009), “Numerical Modeling and Simulation of Pile in Liquefiable Soil,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(11): 1405–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubrinovski M, Kokusho T and Ishihara K (2006), “Interpretation from Large-scale Shake Table Tests on Piles Undergoing Lateral Spreading in Liquefied Soils,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26(2): 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash SR, Govindaraju L and Bhattacharya S (2009), “A Case Study of Damages of the Kandla Port and Customs Office Tower Supported on a Mat–pile Foundation in Liquefied Soils under the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(2): 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dungca JR, Kuwano J, Takahashi A, Saruwatari T, Izawa J, Suzuki H and Tokimatsu K (2006), “Shaking Table Tests on the Lateral Response of a Pile Buried in Liquefied Sand,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26(2): 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal A and Lu J (2009), “A Framework for 3D Finite Element Analysis of Lateral Pile System Response,” Proceedings of the Contemporary Topics in In Situ Testing, Analysis, and Reliability of Foundations, Orlando, Florida, United States, pp. 616–623.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal A, Yan L, Yang Z and Conte JP (2008), “Three-dimensional Seismic Response of Humboldt Bay Bridge-foundation-ground System,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(7): 1165–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal A, Yang Z, Parra E and Ragheb A (2003), “Modeling of Cyclic Mobility in Saturated Cohesionless Soils,” International Journal of Plasticity, 19(6): 883–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn W and Fujita N (2002), “Piles in Liquefiable Soils: Seismic Analysis and Design Issues,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(9): 731–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn WL and Thavaraj T (2001), “Deep Foundations in Liquefiable Soils: Case Histories, Centrifuge Tests and Methods of Analysis,” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics and Symposium in Honour of Professor WD Liam Finn., San Diego, California, pp. 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Ling XZ, Tang L and Xu PJ (2011), “Soil-pilebridge Structure Interaction in Liquefying Ground Using Shake Table Testing,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31(7): 1009–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González L, Abdoun T and Dobry R (2009), “Effect of Soil Permeability on Centrifuge Modeling of Pile Response to Lateral Spreading,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(1): 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh SK and Madabhushi S (2011), “Centrifuge Modelling of Pile-soil Interaction in Liquefiable Slopes,” Geomechanics and Engineering, 3: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He L, Elgamal A, Abdoun T, Abe A, Dobry R, Hamada M, Menses J, Sato M, Shantz T and Tokimatsu K (2009), “Liquefaction-induced Lateral Load on Pile in a Medium Dr Sand Layer,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 13(7): 916–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iai S, Morita T, Kameoka T, Matsunaga Y and Abiko K (1995), “Response of a Dense Sand Deposit During 1993 Kushiro-Oki Earthquake,” Soils and Foundations, 35(1): 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knappett J and Madabhushi S (2008), “Liquefaction-Induced Settlement of Pile Groups in Liquefiable and Laterally Spreading Soils,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134(11): 1609–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law HK and Lam IP (2001), “Application of Periodic Boundary for Large Pile Group,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(10): 889–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Soltani H, Pinilla JD, Muraleetharan KK, Cerato AB and Miller GA (2011), “Centrifuge Investigation of Seismic Behavior of Pile Foundations in Soft Clays,” Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2011 conference, Dallas, Texas, United States, pp. 585–594.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Elgamal A, Yan L, Law KH and Conte JP (2011), “Large-scale Numerical Modeling in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering,” International Journal of Geomechanics, 11(6): 490–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari B, Truman K, El Naggar M and Gould P (2004), “Three-dimensional Nonlinear Analysis for Seismic Soil–pile-structure Interaction,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24(4): 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari B, Truman K, Gould P and El Naggar M (2005), “Three-dimensional Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Single Piles Using Finite Element Model: Effects of Plasticity of Soil,” International Journal of Geomechanics, 5(1): 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari B and Watanabe H (2006), “Nonlinear Dynamic Behavior of Pile Foundations: Effects of Separation at the Soil-pile Interface,” Soils and Foundations, 46(4): 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni S, McKenne F, Scott M and Fenves G (2009), “Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation User Manual Version 2.1.0,” Berkeley, CA, University of California, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK (2008), “Mitigation of Liquefaction Potential of Silty Sands,” Proceedings of the From Research to Practice in Geotechnical Engineering, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, pp. 433–451.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Motamed R and Towhata I (2010), “Shaking Table Model Tests on Pile Groups Behind Quay Walls Subjected to Lateral Spreading,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136(3): 477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nogami T, Otani J, Konagai K and Chen H (1992), “Nonlinear Soil-pile Interaction Model for Dynamic Lateral Motion,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 118(1): 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohtsuki A, Fukutake K, Fujikawa S and Sato M (1994), “Three Dimensional Effective Analysis for Evaluating Response of Group Pile Foundation under Liquefaction,” Journal of Structural Mechanics and Earthquake Engineering, (495): 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo A, Wotherspoon L, Wood J, Chapman H, Scott A, Hogan L, Kivell A, Camnasio E, Yashinsky M and Bruneau M (2011), “Lessons Learnt from 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes: Analysis and Assessment of Bridges,” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44(4): 319–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra E (1996), “Numerical Modeling of Liquefaction and Lateral Ground Deformation Including Cyclic Mobility and Dilation Response in Soil Systems,” PhD Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayamajhi D, Nguyen TV, Ashford SA, Boulanger RW, Lu J, Elgamal A and Shao L (2014), “Numerical Study of Shear Stress Distribution for Discrete Columns in Liquefiable Soils,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140(3):04013034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins KM, Gerber TM, Lane JD and Ashford SA (2005), “Lateral Resistance of a Full-scale Pile Group in Liquefied Sand,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(1): 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Ling XZ, Xu PJ, Gao X and Wang DS (2010), “Shake Table Test of Soil-pile groups-bridge Structure Interaction in Liquefiable Ground,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 9(1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towhata I, Sesov V, Motamed R and Gonzalez M (2006), “Model Tests on Lateral Earth Pressure on Large Group Pile Exerted by Horizontal Displacement of Liquefied Sandy Ground,” Proceedings of the Eighth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering and 100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference, San Francisco, California, pp. 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzuoka R, Cubrinovski M, Sugita H, Sato M, Tokimatsu K, Sento N, Kazama M, Zhang F, Yashima A and Oka F (2008), “Prediction of Pile Response to Lateral Spreading by 3-D Soil–Water Coupled Dynamic Analysis: Shaking in the Direction Perpendicular to Ground Flow,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28(6): 436–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Kutter BL, Chacko MJ, Wilson DW, Boulanger RW and Abghari A (1998), “Nonlinear Seismic Soil-Pile Structure Interaction,” Earthquake Spectra, 14(2): 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver TJ, Ashford SA and Rollins KM (2005), “Response of 0.6 M Cast-in-Steel-Shell Pile in Liquefied Soil under Lateral Loading,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(1): 94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wotherspoon LM, Pender MJ and Orense RP (2012), “Relationship between Observed Liquefaction at Kaiapoi Following the 2010 Darfield Earthquake and Former Channels of the Waimakariri River,” Engineering Geology, 125: 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wriggers P (2002), Comput ational Contact Mechanics, John Wiley&Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z (2000), “Numerical Modeling of Earthquake Site Response Including Dilation and Liquefaction,” PhD Thesis, Columbia Univ., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Elgamal A and Parra E (2003), “Computational Model for Cyclic Mobility and Associated Shear Deformation,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129(12): 1119–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z and Jeremic B (2003), “Numerical Study of Group Effects for Pile Groups in Sands,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 27(15): 1255–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yen PW, Chen G, Buckle I, Allen T, Alzamora D, Ger J and Arias J (2011), “Bridge Performance During the 2010 M8.8 Chile Earthquake,” Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, pp. 1649–1659.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zeghal M and Elgamal A (1994), “Analysis of Site Liquefaction Using Earthquake Records,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120(6): 996–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F and Kimura M (2002), “Numerical Prediction of the Dynamic Behaviors of an RC Group-pile Foundation,” Soils and Foundations, 42(3): 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz O, Chan A, Pastor M, Paul D and Shiomi T (1990), “Static and Dynamic Behaviour of Soils: A Rational Approach to Quantitative Solutions. I. Fully Saturated Problems,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 429(1877): 285–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, China

    Liang Tang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Xianzhang Ling & Hui Li

  2. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, China

    Nengpan Ju

Authors
  1. Liang Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoyu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xianzhang Ling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nengpan Ju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Tang.

Additional information

Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 51108134 and 51378161

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, L., Zhang, X., Ling, X. et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on the dynamic response of pile group in liquefying ground. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 15, 103–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0308-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0308-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation