Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The calculation of equivalence factor for ecological footprints in China: a methodological note

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Ecological Footprint (EF), a physical indicator to measure the extent of humanity’s use of natural resources, has gained much attention since it was first used by Wackernagel and Rees in 1996. In order to appraise land area types with different levels of productivity, they introduced the concept of an equivalence factor. This relates to the average primary biomass productivities of different types of land (i.e. arable land, pasture, forest, water/fishery, built-up land and fossil energy land) to the regional average primary biomass productivity of all land types in a given year. Hence, the equivalence factor is an important parameter in the EF model and it directly affects the reliability of all results. Thus, this article calculates equivalence factors on the national and provincial levels in China based on Net Primary Production (NPP) from MODIS 1 km data in 2008. Firstly, based on the Light Utility Efficiency and CASA model, the NPP of different biologically productive lands of China and of different provinces was calculated. Secondly, China’s equivalence factor for 6 land area types was calculated based on NPP: arable land and built-up land has an equivalence factor of 1.71, forest and fossil energy land has a factor of 1.41, pasture has a factor of 0.44 and water/fishery 0.35; Finally, the equivalence factor of 6 land area types in different provinces was also calculated. The NPP of each ecosystem type varies along with the equivalence factor in different provinces. However, the ranking of the equivalence factors in different provinces remain the same, with that of arable land being the largest, and the water/fishery being the smallest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Schulz N B, Erb K H, Haberl H, Krausmann F. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3): 271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen C Z, Lin Z S. A nonlinear dynamic analysis of ecological footprint and biocapacity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26: 3812–3816

    Google Scholar 

  3. LI W H, LIU M C. A discussion on indicator systems of Ecoprovince construction in China. Resources Science, 2007, 29(5): 2–8 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rees WE. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2): 121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wackernagel M, Rees W E. Our Ecological Footprint, Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Philadelphia: New society Publishers, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, Callejas Linares A, Susana López Falfánn I, Méndez García J, Isabel Suárez Guerrero A, Guadalupe Suárez Guerrero M. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(3): 375–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeroen C J M Van den Bergh Harmen Verbruggen. Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(1): 61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferng J J. Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints. Ecological Economics, 2002, 40(1): 53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stöglehner G. Ecological footprint—A tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2003, 11(3): 267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. WWF. Zoological Society of London, Global Footprint Network, 2002. Living Planet Report 2002 http//www.panda.org/downloads/general/LPR2002

    Google Scholar 

  11. WWF. Zoological Society of London, Global Footprint Network, 2004. Living Planet Report 2004 http//www.panda.org/downloads/general/LPR2004

    Google Scholar 

  12. WWF. Zoological Society of London, Global Footprint Network, 2006. Living Planet Report 2006 http//www.panda.org/downloads/general/LPR2006

    Google Scholar 

  13. Min Q W, Yu W D, Cheng S K. Time serial analysis of residents’ living consumption with ecological footprint in Shangqiu of Henan province. Resources Science, 2004, 26(5): 125–131 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Erb K H. Actual land demand of Austria 1926–2000: a variation on ecological footprint assessments. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3): 247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cao S Y, Xie G D. Applying input-output analysis for calculation of ecological footprint of China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(4): 1499–1507 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu M C, Li W H, CFu C, Zhang D. Dynamic Prediction of Chinese Development Based on Ecological Footprint Method. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2010, 17(6): 499–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Riley N E. China’s population: new trends and challenges. Population Bulletin, 2004, 59(2): 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhong Z. Natural resources planning, management, and sustainable use in China. Resources Policy, 1999, 25(4): 211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chambers N, Simmons C, Wackernagel M. Ecological Footprint Analysis: Towards a Sustainability Indicator for Business. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd., 2001

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hanley N, Moffatt I, Faichney R, Wilson M. Measuring sustainability: a time series of alternative indicators for Scotland. Ecological Economics, 1999, (28): 55–73

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu J X. Time Series and Geographical Distribution of Ecological Footprint for China. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 2004 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Haberl H, Wackernagel M, Krausmann F, Erb K H, Monfreda C. Ecological footprints and human appropriation of net primary production: a comparison. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3): 279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Running S W, Nemani R, Heinsch F, Zhao M S, Reeves M, Hashimoto H. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience, 2004, 54(6): 547–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vitousek P M, Ehrlich P R, Ehrlich A H, Matson P A. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. Bioscience, 1986, 36(6): 368–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP). Indicators for assessing progress towards the 2010 target: ecological footprint and related concepts. Published as a note by the Executive Secretary for the meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technology Advice, Montreal, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Moran D, Wermer P, Goldfinger S, Deumling D, Murray M. National footprint and biocapacity accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method. Oakland, California: Global Footprint Network, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  27. Venetoulis J, Talberth J. Refining the ecological footprint. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2008, 10(4): 441–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ruimy A, Saugier B, Dedieu G. Methodology for the estimation of terrestrial net primary production from remotely sensed data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1994, 99(D3): 5263–5283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B. Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1993, (7):811–841

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kitzes J, Galli A, Rizk S M, Reed A, Wackernagel M. Guidebook to the National Footprint Accounts: 2008 Edition. Oakland: Global Footprint Network, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xie G D, Lu C X, Cheng S K, Zheng D. Evaluation of natural capital utilization with ecological footprint in China. Resources Science, 2001, 23(6): 20–23 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu Y H. The analysis of China’s human-environment relationship fluctuations between 1961–2001: study based on the EF (Ecological Footprint) model. Economic Geography, 2005, 25(2): 219–222,235 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yuan X H, Li H, Chen B. Dynamic analysis of sustainable development in China based on the ecological footprint. The Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 2005, 15(3): 38–42 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China

    Moucheng Liu, Wenhua Li & Dan Zahng

  2. Dongcheng Educational Research Centre, Beijing, 100101, China

    Ning Su

Authors
  1. Moucheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenhua Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dan Zahng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ning Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moucheng Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, M., Li, W., Zahng, D. et al. The calculation of equivalence factor for ecological footprints in China: a methodological note. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 9, 1015–1024 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0670-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0670-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation