Skip to main content
Log in

Production of N2O in two biologic nitrogen removal processes: a comparison between conventional and short-cut nitrogen removal processes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The N2O production in two nitrogen removal processes treating domestic wastewater was investigated in laboratory-scale aerobic-anoxic sequencing batch reactors (SBRs). Results showed that N2O emission happened in the aerobic phase rather than in the anoxic phase. During the aerobic phase, the nitrogen conversion to N2O gas was 27.7%and 36.8% of NH +4 -N loss for conventional biologic N-removal process and short-cut biologic N-removal process. The dissolved N2O was reduced to N2 in the anoxic denitrification phase. The N2O production rate increased with the increasing of nitrite concentration and ceased when NH +4 -N oxidation was terminated. Higher nitrite accumulation resulted in higher N2O emission in the short-cut nitrogen removal process. Pulse-wise addition of 20 mg NO 2 -N·L−1 gave rise to 3-fold of N2O emission in the conventional N-removal process, while little change happened with 20 mg NO 3 -N·L−1 was added to SBR1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Noda N, Kaneko N, Mikami M, Kimochi Y, Tsuneda S, Hirata A, Mizuochi M, Inamori Y. Effects of SRT and DO on N2O reductase activity in an anoxic-oxic activated sludge system. Water Science & Technology, 2003, 48(11–12): 363–370

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu X H, Peng Y, Wu C Y, Akio T, Peng Y Z. Nitrous oxide production during nitrogen removal from domestic wastewater in lab-scale sequencing batch reactor. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 2008, 20(6): 641–645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou Y, Pijuan M, Yuan Z G. Development of a 2-sludge, 3-stage system for nitrogen and phosphorous removal from nutrient-rich wastewater using granular sludge and biofilms. Water Research, 2008, 42(12): 3207–3217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change: the Scientific Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kampschreur M J, Temmink H, Kleerebezem R, Jetten M S M, Loosdrecht M C M. Nitrous oxide emission during wastewater treatment. Water Research, 2009, 43(17 ):4093–4103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bock E, Koops H P, Harns H. Cell Biology of Nitrifying Bacteria, Nitrification. Oxford: IRL Press, 1986, 17–38

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prosser J I. Autotrophic nitrification in bacteria. Advances in Microbial Physiology, 1989, 30(1): 125–181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. von Schulthess R, Wild D, Gujer W. Nitric and nitrous oxides from denitrifying activated sludge at low oxygen concentration. Water Science & Technology, 1994, 30(6): 123–132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Osada T, Kuroda K, Yonaga M. Reducing nitrous oxide gas emissions from fill-and-draw type activated sludge process. Water Research, 1995, 29(6): 1607–1608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Itokawa H, Hanaki K, Matsuo T. Nitrous oxide production in high-loading biological nitrogen removal process under low COD/N ratio condition. Water Research, 2001, 35(3): 657–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burgess J E, Colliver B B, Stuetz R M, Stephenson T. Dinitrogen oxide production by a mixed culture of nitrifying bacteria during ammonia shock loading and aeration failure. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2002, 29(6): 309–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peng Y Z, Zhu G B. Biological nitrogen removal with nitrification and denitrification via nitrite pathway. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2006, 73(1): 15–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bock E, Schmidt I, Stüven R, Zart D. Nitrogen loss caused by denitrifying Nitrosomonas cells using ammonium or hydrogen as electron donors and nitrite as electron acceptor. Archives of Microbiology, 1995, 163(1): 16–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kampschreur M J, Tan N C G, Kleerebezem R, Picioreanu C, Jetten MS M, Loosdrecht MCM. Effect of dynamic process conditions on nitrogen oxides emission from a nitrifying culture. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(2): 429–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zeng R J, Lemaire R, Yuan Z, Keller J. A novel wastewater treatment process: simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal. Water Science &Technology, 2004, 50(10): 163–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lemaire R, Meyer R, Taske A, Crocetti G R, Keller J, Yuan Z. Identifying causes for N2O accumulation in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor performing simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal. Journal of Biotechnology, 2006, 122(1): 62–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard Methods for the Examination for Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. Washington, D C: American Public Health Association, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, van Loosdrecht M C M. Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Scientific and Technical Report No.9. London: IWA Publishing, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang Q, Liu X, Peng C Y, Wang S, Sun H, Peng Y. N2O production during nitrogen removal via nitrite from domestic wastewater: main sources and control method. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(24): 9400–9406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahn J H, Kwan T, Chandran K. Comparison of partial and full nitrification processes applied for treating high-strength nitrogen wastewaters: microbial ecology through nitrous oxide production. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(7): 2734–2740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Colliver B B, Stephenson T. Production of nitrogen oxide and dinitrogen oxide by autotrophic nitrifiers. Biotechnology Advances, 2000, 18(3): 219–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wrage N, Velthol G L, van Beausichem M L, Oenema O. Role of nitrifier denitrification in the production of nitrous oxide. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2001, 33(12–13): 1723–1732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kampschreur M J, van der Star W R L, Wielders H A, Mulder J W, Jetten MS M, van Loosdrecht MC M. Dynamics of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide emission during full-scale reject water treatment. Water Research, 2008, 42(3): 812–826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wicht H. A model for predicting nitrous oxide production during denitrification in activated sludge. Water Science & Technology, 1996, 34(5–6): 99–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tallec G, Garnier J, Billen G, Gousailles M. Nitrous oxide emissions from denitrifying activated sludge of urban wastewater treatment plants, under anoxia and low oxygenation. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(7): 2200–2209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nelson L M, Knowles R. Effect of oxygen and nitrate on nitrogen fixation and denitrification by Azospirillum brasilense grown in continuous culture. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 1978, 24(11): 1395–1403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sacks L E, Barker H A. The influence of oxygen on nitrate and nitrite reduction. Journal of Bacteriology, 1949, 58(1): 11–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Otte S, Grobben N G, Robertson L A, Jetten M S M, Kuenen J G. Nitrous oxide production by Alcaligenes faecalis under transient and dynamic aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1996, 62(7): 2421–2426

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youkui Gong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gong, Y., Peng, Y., Wang, S. et al. Production of N2O in two biologic nitrogen removal processes: a comparison between conventional and short-cut nitrogen removal processes. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 8, 589–597 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0571-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0571-7

Keywords

Navigation